Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

DEEPAK BATRA vs ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-1437-2019
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing9 Mar 2023
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2019
Party Details
Petitioner
  • DEEPAK BATRA
Respondent
  • ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD
Case Summary

The case DEEPAK BATRA vs ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD concerns GRG matters under RERA-GRG.

The case is filed in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) (Case No. RERA-GRG-1437-2019).

The current case status is disposed and the matter is at the DISPOSED stage, last heard on 9 Mar 2023.

Hearing History (17)
9MAR 2023
Hearing

Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

The counsel for the respondent states that the matter has been amicably settled and a copy of settlement deed shall be filed in the registry of the authority within 3 days.  None is present on behalf of the complainant. The respondent is directed to file settlement deed within one week in the registry of the authority. The matter stands disposed off in view of the amicably settlement

Stage: DISPOSED

23DEC 2022
Hearing

Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

Proceedings were adjourned due to administrative reasons.  Therefore,  no hearings. Adjourned to  09.03.2023   for the purpose as already fixed.

Stage: PENDING

6OCT 2022
Hearing

Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

There is no ambiguity in this regard that the process of CIRP has been initiated against respondent no. 1 i.e. 3C shelters but there is no clarity that whether the respondent no. 2 shall be covered under the same or not as in this particular project namely "Greenopolis" the payment is received by 3C shelters. In view of aforesaid circumstances and keeping in view the interest of allottees, the authority comes to following conclusion:1. The cases listed from item no. 24 to 35 are taken together which includes cases where the reply from the respondent is still yet to be received. The respondent(s) is directed to file the reply within 15 days of the date of this order.2. The respondents are directed to provide a list with supportive documents with regard to receipt of payment by R1 or R2 towards consideration of the concerned unit in respective cases. 3. The authority is of the view that a clarification be sought from the IRP whether the moratorium is also effective on respondent no. 2 i.e. Orris Infrastructure Private Limited. The registry is directed to send a letter to the appointed IRP to clarify the status of moratorium.4. The complainants in respective cases are also directed to file an undertaking stating whether payments are made in favor of R1 or R2.  Further the authority shall also explore for engaging the services of an expert in NCLT matters to protect the rights and interest of allottees.                    Matter to come up on 23.12.2022 for further proceedings

Stage: PENDING

Orders (10)
9MAR 2023
judgement

Order No: N/A

View Order ↗
9MAR 2023
order

Order No: N/A

View Order ↗
23DEC 2022
order

Order No: N/A

View Order ↗