RAJ MITTAL AND SARIKA GOYAL vs PROMPT ENGINEERING PVT. LTD
Party Details
- RAJ MITTAL AND SARIKA GOYAL
- PROMPT ENGINEERING PVT. LTD
Case Summary
RAJ MITTAL AND SARIKA GOYAL filed Case No. RERA-GRG-5452-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against PROMPT ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. The case has undergone 4 hearings over 11 months. The case was disposed of on 18 Aug 2023. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (4)
- 18AUG 2023Hearing
Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The counsel for the complainants has moved an application dated 18.08.2023 for withdrawal of the present complaint on the ground that the parties have already settled their dispute amicably and the complainants do not want to pursue the present matter. In view of above, the present complaint stands disposed off. File be consigned to the registry.
Stage: DISPOSED
- 7JUL 2023Hearing
Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The present complaint has been received on 09.08.2022 and the reply on behalf of the respondent was received on 14.09.2022. Both the parties have stated at bar that the matter has been settled and consideration shall be paid by the respondent on or before 22.07.2023. In view of the above, the matter stands adjourned to 18.08.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
- 12JAN 2023Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
Due to paucity of time, matter could not be heard. Adjourned to 07.07.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
Orders (5)
- 18AUG 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 18AUG 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 7JUL 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
ffi HARER S- eunueRnul ** *o **,,". ."" l 1j.-Ig,l1!!fll-gjj: 39 PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY Day and Date Complaint No. (lomplainant Reprcsented through Rcspondent Rcsportdent RcPrcscntcd l,ast date of hearing Proceeding Recorded bY Naresh Kumari Proceedings The counsel for the complainants has moved an io. withdrawal o{ the present complaint on the "i."rOy."nf"a their disputc amicably and the t.IARYANA REAL ESTATE REGUTATORY AUTHORITY GURUGRAM efrqrsr tqic-dr trftqrq-fi clB6{sr, rJ6.[rq fqfd-d a*€ application dated 18. ground that the Parti complainants do not umar Member 18.08.2023 pursue thc Prcscnt mattcr' I n view o f above, thc prescnt co mplaint sta n ds disposed off File be to the reBistry.
Friday and 18.08.2023 CR15452/2022 Case titled as Rai an,l Sarika GoYal Vs M THREE M PRIVATE LIMITF]D Raj Mittal and Sarika Goyal Shri Harsh Jain Advocate M TI.IREE M INDIA PRIVATE LIMI Ms.
ShriYa Takkar Advocate 07 .o7 .2023 .2023 have ant to igncd " ^'' "''' i'E#T##-*'#l;';**H' milm *-";;lPl*" ^" T4