SURENDRA KUMAR MALHOTRA AND ANR vs VATIKA LIMITED
- SURENDRA KUMAR MALHOTRA AND ANR
- VATIKA LIMITED
The case SURENDRA KUMAR MALHOTRA AND ANR vs VATIKA LIMITED concerns GRG matters under RERA-GRG.
The case is filed in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) (Case No. RERA-GRG-2190-2022).
The current case status is disposed and the matter is at the DISPOSED stage, last heard on 2 May 2023.
Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The counsel for the complainant moved an application dated 20.04.2023 for withdrawal of the complaint on the ground that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and a settlement agreement dated 06.12.2022 to this effect has been placed on the record duly signed by both the parties. In view of settlement agreement, the matter stands disposed off. File be consigned to the registry.
Stage: DISPOSED
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The present complaint was filed on 11.05.2022 and registered as complaint No. 2190 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 16.06.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected] & [email protected] and the same are shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file. It is proper service of the notice. On last date of hearing i.e. 02.09.2022, the respondent was directed to file reply within 15 days with an advance copy to the complainant. But the respondent has failed to file reply till date. The counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant. The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 16.12.2022 in the registry of the authority. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off. The matter to come up on 02.05.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
The present complaint was filed on 11.05.2022 and registered as complaint No. 2190 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 16.06.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected] & [email protected] and the same are shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file. It is proper service of the notice. Written reply not filed by the respondent. The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply. Respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 16.09.2022 with advance copy to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off. The matter to come up on 02.12.2022 for further proceedings
Stage: FIRST HEARING