Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

RICHA MEHTA vs VATIKA ONE ON ONE PVT. LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-491-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing1 Aug 2023
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • RICHA MEHTA
Respondent
  • VATIKA ONE ON ONE PVT. LTD.

Case Summary

RICHA MEHTA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-491-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against VATIKA ONE ON ONE PVT. LTD.. The case has undergone 5 hearings over 1 year and 3 months. The case was disposed of on 1 Aug 2023. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (5)

  • 1AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and a settlement agreement dated 26.05.2023 has been placed on record duly signed by both the parties. In view of settlement agreement, the matter stands disposed off.  File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 28FEB 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment to argue the matter.  Request is allowed.      Matter to come up on 01.08.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28OCT 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Due to heavy cause list, the matter could not be heard. Adjourned to 28.02.2023 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20JUL 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 04.02.2022 and registered as complaint No. 491 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 18.02.2022 & 21.02.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file.  Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected] & [email protected]    and the same is shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is proper service of the notice.                  Neither any reply filed nor any cost paid by the respondent till date. The counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has stated at bar that the reply is ready and is being supplied to the complainant and is being submitted in the registry.  He is directed to file the reply in the registry within two days with an advance copy to the complainant by tomorrow positively alongwith costs of Rs.5,000/- imposed on the previous date of hearing. In case the reply is not supplied to the complainant within the stipulated period then the complainant may file an application in the authority for non-filing of reply by the respondent  and for which further cost of Rs.10,000/-  shall be payable to the complainant by the respondent. Matter to come up on 28.10.2022 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12APR 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 04.02.2022 and registered as complaint No. 491 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 18.02.2022 & 21.02.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file.  Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected] & [email protected]    and the same is shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is proper service of the notice.                  Written reply has not been filed by the respondent till date.  The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of the reply.  The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 30.04.2022 in the registry with an advance copy to the complainant.  Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off.                  Matter to come up on 20.07.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (6)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

ffiHARER #* eunuennvr HARYANA REAI ESTATE REGULAIORY AUIHORITY GURUGRAM -dR€nun +1-riu-<r fttrqrq-o spffoaq, Xtqrq NewPWDRestHouse,CivilLines,Gurugram,HarYanarqrfi.sF{fr'-@* PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY Day and Date Tuesday and 01.082023 Complaint No.

Mehta Complainant Richa Mehta Represented through None Respondent Vatika l,imited Respondent Represented Shri Venket llao Advocate Last date of hearing 28.02.2023 Proceeding Recorded bY Naresh Kumari and HR Mehta P roceedings-cum -orders The parties have arrived at an amicable s;ettlement and a st:ttlement agreement dated 26.05.2C|23 has treen placed on record duly signerl by both the parties.

In view of settlement ag:reement, the matter stands disposed off.

File be consigned to the registry, Ashok Sa Mem Memtler 01.08.2,023 CR/49112022 Case titled as Richa VS Vatika Limited iffir Arora Member An Authority constituted under section 20 the Real Estate (Reg,ulation and Development) Act, :1016 It-:iT6I (Ffurra 3ih E-+.rO :rfrfrcq, 2016{l qRI 20h rf,rrd zlfud clfur{ur Yr: a< lijay Kuifiar Goyal