SUNIL KUMAR AGGARWAL vs DLF UTILITIES LIMITED

Hearing History (24)

• 27APR 2023
  Hearing

  Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

  Both the counsels state at bar that the matter has been amicably settled and the possession has been taken by the complainant.  A  copy of compromise reached between the parties has been submitted in the registry of the authority on 06.04.2023. In view of the same the matter stands disposed off.  File be consigned to the registry.

  Stage: DISPOSED

• 6APR 2023
  Hearing

  Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

  The Hon’ble Member is on leave, so the matter is adjourned to 27.04.2023 for the purpose as already fixed.

  Stage: PENDING

• 9MAR 2023
  Hearing

  Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

  Both the counsels state that matter is in advance stage of settlement and is likely to be settled within next 2 weeks and requests for a short adjournment for filing settlement deed.Matter to come up on 06.04.2023 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 15FEB 2023
  Hearing

  Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

  The counsel for the complainant states that he had filed an application for withdrawal of previous complaint No.4105 of 2019 and proof of filing of the said application is not readily available and shall be filing today itself,  the said application is not traceable in the registry record also.                Further,  counsel for the respondent states that as per directions of the authority vide order dated 14.10.2022, respondent was supposed to offer an alternate plot within next 2 weeks  and the said offer was made to the complainant within the prescribed time but the complainant refused to accept the alternate plot at that time.                However,  the counsel for the complainant is filing an application today i.e. on 15.02.2023  that too accept the alternate plot alongwith late delivery charges i.e. DPC @ 10.6% for the applicable tenure  and refund of preferential location charges which they had paid to DLF Utilities Ltd and refund for the difference in size.                 The counsel for the respondent states that  while ordering to offer an alternate plot,  no mention was made by the authority regarding the delayed possession charges, hence,    delay possession charges request is denied  and further states that the complainant has never sought relief   of alternate plot in the two complaints of the said unit. However,  it was a gesture of the respondent to accommodate the allottee  which was not acceptable to the allottee and was not accepted by the allottee and now the respondent is ready to refund the entire amount alongwith interest as per the prayer of the allottee  in its original complaint.               Both the counsels of the parties  also request for a short adjournment of 2 weeks as they are willing to settle down the matter mutually.               Matter to come up on 09.03.2023 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 22DEC 2022
  Hearing

  Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

  Proceedings were adjourned due to administrative reasons.  Therefore,  no hearings. Adjourned to 15.02.2023  for the purpose as already fixed.

  Stage: PENDING

• 14OCT 2022
  Hearing

  Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

  This complaint and the complaint at serial 115  bearing CR No.751/2022 are of the same allottee and the same unit and hence clubbed together. Although the counsel of the respondent clarifies that the relief sought in both the complaints are different but may be heard together. The counsel for the respondent states that the plot allotted is not available at site due to PWD road and site of the instant plot got infringed at the time of demarcation and development works  at the site. Although the part CC after executing the development works in respect of above colony stands obtained on 02.07.2014 and subsequently for additional area  on 18.03.2016  but the offer of possession for the above plot which is not available at site, could not be made till date.  The respondent is offering alternate plot and shall submit the proposal duly marked on the copy of plan alongwith the area available at site within next two weeks in the registry of authority after supplying a copy of the same to the counsel of the respondent. Matter to come up on 22.12.2022 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 26AUG 2022
  Hearing

  Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

  Due to administrative exigencies,  the court is not held today. Hence, the matter is adjourned to 14.10.2022 for the purpose as already fixed.

  Stage: PENDING

• 8FEB 2022
  Hearing

  Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

  In view  of judgment dated 11.11.2021 in title- M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of UP & Ors. Etc. passed by the  Apex Court, this forum has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the complaint in hands.File be transferred to the Authority.  Reader is directed to send the file immediately.

  Stage: PENDING

• 19JAN 2022
  Hearing

  Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

  Counsel for complainant requests  to transfer this matter  to the Authority in view  of judgment dated 11.11.2021 in title- M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of UP & Ors. Etc. passed by Apex Court. Allowed.                              Parties are directed to appear before the Authority  on 08.02.2022 for further proceedings.                         File be sent to the Authority, before said date.

  Stage: PENDING

• 16DEC 2021
  Hearing

  Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

  THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 19.01.2022

  Stage: PENDING

• 15NOV 2021
  Hearing

  Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

  It is pointed out that the Apex Court while deciding Civil Appeal No(s) 6745-6749 of 2021 dated  11.11.2021 in case titled M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of UP & Ors Etc.   has given some directions about jurisdiction between the Authority and the Adjudicating Officer inter se, regarding jurisdiction  of cases relating to refund and  compensation.                          Be put up for further proceedings on 16.12.2021.

  Stage: PENDING

• 27OCT 2021
  Hearing

  Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

  Order is not ready due to overwork.                            To come on 15.11.2021 for order.

  Stage: PENDING

• 12OCT 2021
  Hearing

  Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

  Order is not ready due to overwork. 2.                        To come on  27.10.2021 for order.

  Stage: PENDING

• 21SEP 2021
  Hearing

  Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

  Arguments heard on an application, filed by respondent. 2.                        To come on 12.10.2021 for order.

  Stage: PENDING

• 24AUG 2021
  Hearing

  Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

  Written reply filed on behalf of respondent alongwith an application with request to keep proceedings in abeyance till decision in Civil Writ Petition No. 19958/ 2017 pending before Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.  Copy supplied to the counsel for complainant.  2.                        To come on 21.09.2021 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 13MAY 2021
  Hearing

  Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL

  Due to increase in the Covid-19 cases in and around the area of the Authority and lockdown in the State, the case is not being taken up for hearing. Hence, as per directions of the Hon’ble Authority, it is being adjourned to 24.08.2021 for the proceedings already fixed. 2.         Both the parties be informed accordingly through e-mail.

  Stage: PENDING

• 25FEB 2021
  Hearing

  Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH

  Vide resolution no. 6780 dated 24.02.2021 of the District Bar Association, Gurugram and vide which it requested the Hon’ble Chairman, HARERA to suspend the court work listed on 25.02.2021 on account of its pre-occupation with the newly elected body.2.           In view of that, list the case for further proceedings already fixed on 13.05.2021.

  Stage: PENDING

• 13NOV 2020
  Hearing

  Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH

  THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 25.02.2021

  Stage: PENDING

• 15OCT 2020
  Hearing

  Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH

  None is present on behalf of the complainant. 2. Let notice for the appearance of the complainant/counsel through mail be issued for 13.11.2020.

  Stage: PENDING

• 25AUG 2020
  Hearing

  Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH

  DUE TO PREVAILING COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 15.10.2020

  Stage: PENDING

• 28MAY 2020
  Hearing

  Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL

  DUE TO LOCKDOWN, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 25.08.2020.

  Stage: PENDING

• 9APR 2020
  Hearing

  Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH

  DUE TO LOCKDOWN,THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 28.05.2020

  Stage: PENDING

• 20FEB 2020
  Hearing

  Judge: SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH SAMIR KUMAR

  Case is adjourned to 09.04.2020.                                                                          By Order of the Authority

  Stage: PENDING

• 3JAN 2020
  Hearing

  Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH

  THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 20.02.2020

  Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (15)

• 27APR 2023
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 27APR 2023
  judgement

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 6APR 2023
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 9MAR 2023
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 15FEB 2023
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 22DEC 2022
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 14OCT 2022
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 26AUG 2022
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 25FEB 2021
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 15OCT 2020
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 25AUG 2020
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 28MAY 2020
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 9APR 2020
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 20FEB 2020
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 3JAN 2020
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗