POOJA RAI vs ANSAL PHALAK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-1788-2018

Date of Filing--

Case TypeRERA-GRG

Last Hearing24 Mar 2023

Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗

StateHaryana

CityGurgaon

Year of Filing2018

Petitioner

POOJA RAI

Respondent

ANSAL PHALAK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

POOJA RAI filed Case No. RERA-GRG-1788-2018 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against ANSAL PHALAK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD. The case has undergone 24 hearings over 4 years. The case is currently pending. 22 orders have been issued in this matter.

24MAR 2023
Hearing
Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The present complaint has been received on 23.10.2019 and written submissions on behalf of respondent was received but the same is not dated which was addressed to adjudicating officer and was transferred to authority for further proceeding. The respondent filed an application dated 07.11.2022 for rejection of complaint on ground of absence of power of attorney. The present complaint is not maintainable as the same has been filed by Shri Manish Yadav Advocate without any affidavit of the complainant. On this ground, the present complaint is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh. File be consigned to the registry.
Stage: DISMISSED
15FEB 2023
Hearing
Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment for filing affidavit which was lacking in the complaint and requests for two weeks time for filing an affidavit and to remove the defects in the complaint. However, the counsel for the respondent states that almost 3 months time lapsed since last date of hearing and complainant has not rectified the complaint, hence, the complaint should be dismissed as being defective. However, allottee being an NRI a time of 2 weeks is being allowed to rectify the complaint otherwise the same shall be dismissed on the next date of hearing. Matter to come up on 24.03.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
16NOV 2022
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The present complaint was filed on 23.10.2019 and written submissions on behalf of respondent was received but the same is not updated as the same was addressed to adjudicating officer and had been transferred to authority for further proceeding. The respondent has filed an application dated 07.11.2022 for rejection of complaint on ground of absence of POA and that there is no affidavit of the complainant as the affidavit is signed by the counsel of the complainant on basis of vakalatnama only. The counsel for the complainant seeks a short adjournment for submitting affidavit of the complainant within four weeks in the registry of the authority. Matter to come up on 15.02.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
10AUG 2022
Hearing
Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
Due to paucity of time, matter could not be heard. Adjourned to 16.11.2022 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
18FEB 2022
Hearing
Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR
In view of judgment dated 11.11.2021 in title- M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of UP & Ors. Etc. passed by the Apex Court, this forum has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the complaint in hands. File be transferred to the Authority. Next date will be notified later on by the Authority. Reader is directed to send the file immediately.
Stage: PENDING
11JAN 2022
Hearing
Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR
None for complainant. Issue notice for next date. To come on 18.02.2022 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
2DEC 2021
Hearing
Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR
THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 11.01.2022
Stage: PENDING
10NOV 2021
Hearing
Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR
Remaining arguments heard. Learned counsel for respondent also filed written submissions. To come on 02.12.2021 for order.
Stage: PENDING
25OCT 2021
Hearing
Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR
Due to sad demise of two advocates, members of District Bar Association, Gurugram are absenting from court work and thus proceedings could not be taken up today. To come for same proceedings on 10.11.2021.
Stage: PENDING
15SEP 2021
Hearing
Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR
Arguments heard in part. 2. Learned counsel for respondent request for adjournment stating that his client is interested for settlement. Not opposed. Allowed. 3. To come on 25.10.2021 for remaining arguments and order.
Stage: PENDING
8JUL 2021
Hearing
Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR
Vide order dated 10.02.2021, the respondent already proceeded against ex-parte. 2. None is present on behalf of the complainant despite calling and waiting upto 3.00p.m. 3. Notice for the presence of the complainant be issued through email for 15.09.2021. 4. To come on ex-parte arguments on 15.09.2021.
Stage: PENDING
19APR 2021
Hearing
Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL
IN PURSUANCE TO NOTICE, THE COMPLAINANT PUT IN APPEARANCE THROUGH HIS COUNSEL. 2. NONE IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT. A PERUSAL OF THE CASE FILE SHOWS THAT ON PREVIOUS DATE MR. GAGAN SHARMA, ADV ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT WAS PRESENT. A NOTICE FOR HIS PRESENCE WAS ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT THROUGH E-MAIL. BUT DESPITE THAT NONE HAS TURNED UP ON ITS BEHALF. SO, IT SHOWS THAT THE RESPONDENT IS NOT INTERESTED TO CONTEST THE CLAIM OF THE CLAIMANTS AND AS SUCH ARE ORDERED TO BE PROCEEDED AGAINST EX-PARTE. 3. FOR ARGUMENTS, MATTER BE PUT UP ON 19.04.2021.
Stage: PENDING
10FEB 2021
Hearing
Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL
In pursuance to notice, the complainant put in appearance through his counsel. 2. None is present on behalf of the respondent. A perusal of the case file shows that on previous date Mr. Gagan Sharma, Adv on behalf of the respondent was present. A notice for his presence was issued to the respondent through e-mail. But despite that none has turned up on its behalf. So, it shows that the respondent is not interested to contest the claim of the claimants and as such are ordered to be proceeded against ex-parte. 3. For arguments, matter be put up on 19.04.2021.
Stage: PENDING
7DEC 2020
Hearing
Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL
THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 10.02.2021
Stage: PENDING
12OCT 2020
Hearing
Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL
None is present on behalf of the complainant. So, notice for the presence of the complainant through mail be issued for the date fixed. 2.The complaint was filed in forum CAO. Its reply has not been received. 3. Let the same be filed 15 days prior to the date fixed with an advance copy to the other side alongwith complete list of documents consisting of sanctioned plan of the project, statement of account of the complainant’s unit, environment clearance certificate, copy of BBA and the latest status report of the project duly verified by a responsible person connected with the construction department by way of an affidavit with an advance copy to the complainant 10 days prior to the date fixed. 4. List for arguments on 07.12.2020.
Stage: PENDING
19AUG 2020
Hearing
Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL
DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 12.10.2020
Stage: PENDING
22MAY 2020
Hearing
Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL
DUE TO LOCKDOWN, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 19.08.2020
Stage: PENDING
3APR 2020
Hearing
Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL
Due to Lockdown, the matter is adjourned to 22.05.2020
Stage: PENDING
14FEB 2020
Hearing
Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH
CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 03.04.2020. BY THE ORDER OF THE AUTHORITY
Stage: PENDING
4NOV 2019
Hearing
Judge: SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH SAMIR KUMAR
THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 14.02.2019
Stage: PENDING
4OCT 2019
Hearing
Judge: N/A
THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 04.11.2019
Stage: PENDING
27AUG 2019
Hearing
Judge: N/A
THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 04.10.2019
Stage: PENDING
30APR 2019
Hearing
Judge: N/A
THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 27.08.2019
Stage: PENDING
14MAR 2019
Hearing
Judge: N/A
CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 30.4.2019.
Stage: FIRST HEARING