VINOD KUMAR vs ELAN BUILDCON PVT. LTD
Party Details
- VINOD KUMAR
- ELAN BUILDCON PVT. LTD
Case Summary
VINOD KUMAR filed Case No. RERA-GRG-4829-2020 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against ELAN BUILDCON PVT. LTD. The case has undergone 9 hearings over 1 year and 11 months. The case was disposed of on 3 Mar 2023. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (9)
- 3MAR 2023Hearing
Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
Matter is Disposed off.
Stage: DISPOSED
- 1FEB 2023Hearing
Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
Vide order dated 20.08.2021 the Hon’ble Adjudicating officer disposed off the complaint directing the respondent to refund the amount paid by the complainant along with interest. The respondent filed an appeal no. 565 of 2021 against the said order of the Adjudicating Officer. The HREAT vide order dated 25.04.2022 allowed the appeal and set aside the order dated 20.08.2021 passed by the Adjudicating Officer stating the case is remitted for fresh trail in accordance with law to the learned Haryana Real Estate Authority, Gurugram. However, the respondent filed an application for fresh trial by the Haryana Real Estate Authority, Gurugram. On the last date of hearing, none was present on behalf of the respondent. Hence, a fresh notice was sent to the respondent vide email on the following email addresses [email protected] of which delivery has been confirmed. The AR of the respondent company states at bar that they have received communication only yesterday and they are in the process of engaging advocate for the matter and seeks short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 03.03.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
- 13DEC 2022Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
Vide order dated 20.08.2021 the present complaint was disposed off by the Adjudicating Officer. The respondent-promoter has filed the appeal against the aforesaid order before the Appellate Tribunal. Vide its orders dated 25.4.2022 the present case has been remanded back by the Appellate Tribunal in the Appeal No.560 of 2021 filed M/s Elan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. The present appeal has been preferred by M/s Elan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. against the orders dated 20.8.2021 passed by the Adjudicating Officer where by the complaint filed by the respondent-allotee for refund of the entire amount paid by him to the appellate promoter alongwith interest. The Hon’ble Appellate Tribune has allowed the said appeal in view the judgement passed by the Apex Court in case M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of UP and ors. as the Adjudicating Officer was not competent to entertain, adjudicate upon and grant the relief of refund with interest. It was only the Regulatory Authority which had jurisdiction to deal with the complaint filed by the respondent-allotee. Keeping in view the above discussions, the Appellate Tribunal has set aside the orders of the Adjudicating Officer dated 20.8.2021 and the case is remitted for fresh trial in accordance with law to the Learned Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram. The parties are directed to appear before the authority on 25.5.2022. Besides the amount deposited by the appellate-promoter i.e. Rs.16,18,443/- with this Tribunal to comply with the provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act be returned/refunded to the appellant-respondent alongwith interest accrued thereon, in accordance with law/rules and of course subject to tax liability, if any. The counsel for the complainant has filed an application dated 6.6.2022 for listing of the above case as the cause list of 25.5.2022 is not having he abovesaid matter listed. The notice to both the parties was sent through email dated 03.10.2022. The case was listed today for arguments but none is present on behalf of the respondent. One more opportunity is being given to the respondent to put in appearance on next date of hearing failing which matter shall be proceeded exparte. This shall be the last opportunity. Matter to come up on 01.02.2023 for further arguments.
Stage: PENDING
Orders (10)
- 3MAR 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 3MAR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 1FEB 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
*HARERi !$, c,rn rr,nm.r BETOR' THE HARYANA RIAL TSTATE REGULATORY AU-IHORIT}, GURUGRAM : .ssoi,olo D4 or ir4jllDrli;r, itl,orut LI!!t1*.o!'!!t!! is.cen r {.v1dre2i2i v old Klnnv/5Dhi Bu idoi !i ,la Ntrr Mdrctra vA E an Bu &on Pvr e R ?i(!nl l ORDEN 1.
Thisorder sharl d6pose ofallthe 2.omptaints titted asabove ited berbrc rhs authority under sedion 3r ofrhe RealE*ate (Resutation a.d DeveLophcnil Ad,2016 [hereinaherrefc ed as"rheAd"] radw h rute23orthc aryji.
Real Eskte(tusuraiionand Devetopmentl Rutes 2ot7 {hereinaiterrere(cdas "ihe rure{l ror vioLation ofsedLon 11(41(4 ofthe ad whftin ir ts rcr atD presdibed that ihe pronoter shaLL be responsibt. for aI ns obtis ,ons rcsponsibilnies aDd funciions to rhe allorees rs per rhe asreemenr for sat. executed inter sebetween parties *HARER S c,LrnLcnru, Tha .ore issues emanaring from in naturc and rhe complainan(, in the above reIert?d m rets a.c alorees or the pro]ed, hamely, Elatr l own cenhe tcomher.ial.ompterl hcing devetoped by rhe sim. rcspon'lent/promoter i.e, rjlrn BuiLd.on pvr Lrd The rerhsrnd.ondtrLonr ol thebuyersas.eenentsfuLcruDorrhe6sueinvoLvedrnrLLrhes..asespe(.trns to failure on the part ofthe promorerto delrverr hety po$es,on ofthc utriir ,r qu.nion, seekingaward ol.crui The detarrs of rhe rompta'nB, repty to *atus, unr no., d e of agreem.nt possesiondause,duedarof pose$Dn,totaLsaL!.otrnderanon,roraLDjLd amoun! a'd reriefsoughtarepiven inrhe rable betow: poerdotrd,6.: r1G) rre devetoperbased on its prolecr ptanni.g atrd e*Lhates and subie.troall ju$ ex.eptionsendeavou6 to.omplere.on$rudionof the$id buildins/ said unir w(hii.r period of36 monrhs i.om th.dare ofrhisasrccmeDt with an €xknsion offurher l? months unle$ rhere sha Lbe detav or raitur dF 2 IT HARER,, 4- cLnrr,nml I SHARER- S arnnnnv L l aPAmo,dFid by rh€ r ofte(s) The aforesaid complarnr werefited by thacomptiinanr asain*rhe promorer on a..ounr of v'or,rioi ot the builder buyers agreement cx..uted hdw..i rhr parti. rhr parti.s in resp{r orsaid unns for nor handin€ over the possesion byrhe due dare seeking award or rerund the en re amount along with 'Dtcrcd rnd It has beeh decded to treat the said.onpLaints as an appti.anon ror tron .ohplianc. ordaturory obligaoons on the part orihe promorer tespondenr $ Erms or sdb, 34(r) or the A.r whi.h mandatcs the aurhorry ro ensu.c .oDrprian.e ord'e obLictr!ons.ai upon the protrrole6, rhe aLorecGt rtrd rhe real e$*easent underrhe Act, the tuler and thc r.sula!ons nade thc.cunde' rhe racb or.llrhe.ompraints nLed by rhe ompL nantGya oree(rro ate similar. out or rhe above.m.itioned .ara rhe part.utax of.o,'rrarn. ff. b.driry no.4a29/2020 titkd ytnod Kumar v/s flan Bu,ld.on An.
Ltd.
6 *HARERi S- eunuenm,r beingtake! as a lea'l case in order to determine the ishts orthe alloree[, qua reltrnd the enrire amount.lonB with'ntepn.
Pro,ccr and uhrh€lar.d debih Thepa i.uLa6of theproje.!rhedabihof s.lecons'derarion,theamountpaid by the.omplahat(s) date or proposed handins over the po!sesiotr, dal:y the rolbwing rabuLf fom: cR/4aze/2oro id.d vtnod Ktna. v/s flatr Buirdcon Pr.
Ltd. (as ps p4€ no r4oi!.np6Dr) - t; #HARER -l}- GURUGnAT,T au* rlktof rhrsidaerccne m:t4 :nd rbi!fr b ,r !$ ron dseeid bu din./ ed utr I *HARER.
S- cL n, r,nl,r B.
F,.tsorth€(onptrtht 3 Thecomplarnanihasmaderhefollowincsubmtsnonsrnthe.ompla'nr I Thaftheproiecttnquenion6knownas'EhnTownCenhe,,arSecror6T, curgaon Thar respondeit terer or ihe urn on 0603.2017the.o$oruiituasrnvedatRs 2617,s00/ rhroushwhnh the complain:rr w.s allored Fo adheasu nssuperarea or300sq h. ll Thaton2307.2016the.omplainaniblokadthefood.oununitbypryrng Rs.2,47,s00/ throu3h rhe chequa lndia.
The rcspondent.onvi..ed th. drenr hy showins the nap of the rood.oun unitwhereas the unithad the seryice.oftidoA behind cvery sinsle unir, wh,ch is an esenrill asped of runni.g iha kiichei of the lood uLd.hoos? thc unna! perh i w sh by seeinBthelalout plan lll. plan lll.
That evei before the nsuanceorrhe allormenr lerer rhecdmplainant had already paid Rs 1032,731l. on the demand or rhe respondcnt The respondenr iccepted 3s%oft he amounteven b€rore theenterinB Lnrorhe lv rhaton2007.2017aprprint!d,one{idedbuilderbuyeragEementwrs t aid respondent, the.omplainanr hrd no say and lollowcd thc doted lines as ser by rh. respondenr buiLder in v.
Thar the paymenr plan agreed berwccn th. paries was t0:2s:6s whereas rhe 65% of the amountwas to he paid at rhe posses'on The l}HARER: $-cLrnLrr,nmr .omplainant has already paid 35% of the agreed amount tilldai. to th. vl.
That as mentioned in the builder buyer agreenent rhe superarea olrhe rood.out unit r supposed to be 300 squff.leet whereasthe bu'ld.r failed toriiex the ex.ct drmensionsol(he un with the buiLde. buyc. the actual.arpet a.ea or its dLdensions 1.1 lhdo'r30o n)0' dF.ponde'':enlhd 4rr and alonp with thatit scnta dema.d l€nci askins rbr the paym.nr or Rs wasshon lived, and henoled tha what was pronrised or rhe fo!lowi.g counts. rx.
Thrtrheconpla Dntwas!ho.kedtofindoutthatthca.lutr.rrpeiir.r ortheunitws ju$4r squeeG*(snern LxB *7x61 HeMethenlo or .arpetar.atosuperareastu$14%orinthewordstheloadiigwass6to of th. size agaLns the usual 45 50% in the .omm€rciaL uii6.
Thc rerpotrdenr.hanced the iayout plan of the un( Jid now the roodcoun unitsar madeback to bi.k,an'ln the units, wh'ch r an e$ential aspect oI op.Dins the kuchen n (he premisas :id again( thc sct norms of rhe unirs ol rood couits The lo.ations olthe unn are completely changed a! promi!ed and on whnh the buildercoivin.ed the dLetrr to buythe untr vlll That after receLpt or the posesron leter ihe .omplainant was qujte happy to ger the trntwhi.h he wan went to chc.k the ohyncalpturres oi ete lhe conphii3trt Mpp Es iTHARER.
S-cLrnLr,nlr lercr. rhe \omptJn:ir {nr: eker inform,ns abour the disrepan.'es rh"pronhcdd "ddJ _n "-o I hish loadrh& ahse.e orseri.e.orridots and.hange rn rhe tayour pLrn xr Thar thevartous snren. ous snren.nd verbaLrenr nde6 ro thecompaiies and r,. rorL i o r.ie enr undr \trcred byrh.,F.poroclr.nd, ompL,n" . u fored ro take the .onplaimn! to ths on,bte Authoriiy ror rhe xrl Thai as per the .lause 1.6 of the buitder buyer asreement the 'nJr' a rhe rrpd rad w.tbr r least the s0% or rhe super a.ea w thecomndrialunittand also the seruice.oridos ara in esentialparr oa the kiosks and lood.oun unis, hur has mserabtv rr'led ro leep ts.ommtrh.rr. xlll.
Thatthemainsrievanceoirhe.omptainantinthepresentcompla,nanr ai end user sho trbhed ro open rhe roud rhe prtmEes burthehish lord'n3ha5 r€nd€red rhE unr as unfi r for the usase as the food.ourt,a! n becomes impo$rbte ru upq, *HARER; S cLrtnnau F;;;l --*,* *.^. ] ihe kitchen rnru.has shor spa.e xrv.
That the orher grievan.s of rhe.omptainant h thar the buitder has changedrhelayoutof rheuiirandtheabsenceortheservrcco(idorr has made this unit a safe!, hazard and unht tor opeh,ng any ,ood oudets rhat as per sedion r2 of rhe Reat lnate (Rdsula.on and Development) Act, 2016 this be.ones rhe maner or rhe fad rh* the resp0ndenthisted thecomptalnaniaboutrhe erorbitandy hish loadine and showed rhe o.e tayout.r th€ tire oI bookins and cha.ged the tayout later on without conse.t and made rhesc units a sarery hazard dle to the absence orsefr rd€.otrdo6. xv.
That the complainant *ared thai about the dk.repan.,e! ri rhe promised and aduat unttand fo. the canc.lation oirhe unir as this hrgh roadh& absence or serutce m!!,dor and change in the tayout pti, withour.onsentwas unacceptabte ro the comp ainanr teading ro n rE rhis complaLnr seekin3 rcfund oft hsdep6itsdamountaton3with orher R€rief sought by rh. coDplalEnr _ rhe.omplaiDanr has soushr rollowrns r.tief G): I DiredrherespondentrorcfundtheamountofRsl0,32,T3ll.aton3with D.
Reply by thr respohdcni * HARER S eunueml,r 10 The respond€nt has contesed the.ompt,inr on the foIowing Brounds l.
Thai the prosent compt:int has been ii*irured by the . d by the .omplainatrr ji respect of Kosk h$riig runber 0203 on second flooradm$surtrg 300 squaF feet approximarety Guparurei) to.arcd in the prorec( devcloped by rhe respondent known as Elan Town cenEe tocated at sedor 6i Curugram.
The .omplainant had evin.ed an 'ntcre$ in purchrrDg a unr/kiosk in the saLd pro)e4 and had approa.hed rhe respondrnt volutrtarly to purchasc the sane.-rhe.omplainanr had rlr.Jdy .onduded htdue drligence p.daining to rhe crpability olrhe rcspondetrr to dcvclopi .oi$rlct, naiket etc the said prcjad oDly ilter beins s lsfiedabouttheabilltyortherespordetrtdidthe.ompkiDairpro.eed to pur.hasea untr/kiosk ', thesaid proied n.
Thatanapprrcationfomdaied2s.0T.20l6hadbeenvotunurityti edand sisned by the.o'nplainant perLrin'i3 ro pur.h:sc of a uin ri rhe 'trd prolect.
Thercaiter, arrotmeit rerer dated 06.03.?017 had bepn s!ed by the respondent to the.omplainant vide whtrh rhe sdd k osk had b.!r) alloted to the complahanL lll.
TMr the buyers aSreehent was exe.red beveen the padies on ion that the.omptainanr had exe.ur.d theaforesaid buyer s acreenent volunranLy after carelully soins throush the terms and conditions rrcorporared therein Th. comptainanr, wrhour bei4 innuen.ed in any nanner by rhe responddnr had exe.ured the buyers agreefrent after beinq satkfied w,rh the.onradual.ovenants *HARER- *($- G a GRAM That the.ohplainant hat a Leged in the.onpL.riir fited by hrm that the rcspondenr had .hanSed rhe layout or the kiosk Moreoler the io 'o d'nd. r 5r.dr o "rregeo rlr 'hd d n^ .ro{ r.rd ' i up- .r, d,. nerely14% nwolLdiotbeoutolpla.eromeironthatiowhekLnthe entire.ompLaint has thc.o'nptrii.nt aLLescd rhar there had bcu d,y delal in handiigovarofpossessionorsaid krosk ro the.ompt:rnaft rhe respondent hid applied *aruro,.y adhorty for obraining the o..upation.erifrate dn 20.03.2020 That rerund.t thi: advai.ed *age ofpro,ed n noi in the 'n..ren or th. other allotees at Lars. as the sane will h.'hp.r thc.omplauon or rhe prorc.t. e prorc.t. rtis submted rh !he respond!Dt.onrprny his nv.ncd a huBa amount on the.o.suu.tion.nd developme.t orthe said pro)e( and 'n case the refund h allowed to thecompLainants, ii would.,use lln:n.'at los to the prole.t as weL a:1os to thegenuLne cunomchn rhe s,rid Thatthecomplai.anr has admrted in the.ompt,iir rited by hrm that the complaihant has made payment ofonly 3s% oftobl !ale .o$ider,rion amount to .he respondeit. lt h perritretri to me,hoi that as per rlr payment pl3n voluDtanly chosen hy the.ompta'naDr, the batan.c 6sE! or rhe.onsiderationanounthadrobe p d ro thc rcspondeml rher mtol him has faired io do so.
As on dare, the compta'ianr is lirble to Dake payfrenr olan ouatandirg arouir ro the r.spoidinS of Rs r7 0q 032/. plus applLcable csT, prus appLi.abre interen, pLur apptr.abl. nanp dury HARER,] GUl?UGRAI/ and other charges as per ihe huilder buyers agresmenr signed by thc vlr.
TharrhecomphinanrhaswronstyaLtenedtharrh?resDondenrhadtaitpd to provide rhe exad dimensions of the kiosk n rhe buitder huy.is agreehent The.omplainant h,s rurtherall.sed th rhe respondcntd'd notinromthe.ompLainiitaboutthe.alperireJolrhesaidkmsk rtLs petinent to m.ntioi that all the relevant do.unrents had been dtrly provided to the comphrianr wherein rhe carper Iea ofthe said krosk alonswiththeexaddineNionshadbsendn.loled Moreover rhadatso been conveyed to thar even thoush att relevrn( document hadbeen provrdedbhin,hewasnorerhan wekohetovis rheoftileolthcrspondentoobraDanydocumentasrcq edbyh n vnr Thrt the complainant has wro.gLy rkred rh rhe raroor.aryerrre,rlo luper area wrh resped io the said unir was iu$ t4%.
Furthcrnore rhe .onplainanr has inFnnohally nisinterprcted ctause 1.6 otth. buyer,s agreement ltupetuDcnrromeniionthaiaspercLruset.6olthebuyer's edf akloskwoutdaho in.tuderheirt: ofntrnE spa.e as wellas serui...otridor Morftvai, ir had.ever been .ommunkated ro the conprainait that the.arperarea of the kiosI wou]d be ar lea* s0% of rhe supcr are . upcr are .omplainanthashinEelfadmtrred that in.asc of.onnercnlui ts, i is $andard pra.ti.ethairhe.arperarea rsar lean s0% ofrheruperrtu.L ti is perinenr lo mention thatthe.omDla Mnr hrd bookcds kiork ind tror afuI r]ed8ed commer.iatunitas n roushtto bepon.ayed b, h,m l I}HARERJ S ernnml,r That nnce the.onplaLnanthad booked a kroskwhtrh was Lo.ared rn rhe food cou on the 2nd 0oorin the$rd projc.t rhe comptainant.atrnor contend that he desenes similar :dvantages and perks as provided to rhe allottees or rurr fledged .omner.irt unrts.
Morcovei rhe .al.uLa.oh5 provided by th..omptaiiranr rn his .omplaitrr wrh resped to the srLd kiotk ire eroneous, fl awed ind sirhour atry basis That twould notbeoutof plrceromennonrh,rrher.isnomenhonot.r seryice .oridor n (he bqer's agreme tt had never been asrced between thc padies ihat, servlce.oridor was ro be prcvided ror rhe kiosk ii quen,on.
The .omplainant has lakety alleged rhai a sc.vre .o dor was to be providcd ro. the kiosk ii que*ion orrhar rhe nm. is an csentiaLaspect ofoperrnns a kiosk in lhe food.our.
Morsovar I kirch.n G providedio the food co Thar on theone handih. conplaranrhrsrelrd upor variourlemsand .ondir'ons in.orpor.ted in thcbuyer sagr..menl and rhc othe' trnd rhe enrirely lBhord ccnar .oinadual .ovcnanG contahed therein. lt has been provided ii clausa LtL, or rhe btrycr's ,creenent that th..onplainanr rfter be'ns tuly satisfied and reyLns trpon hhown rudgmenthrddecidcd tobook rhe said kiosti uninfucn.ed in ant mannerbyth.rspondant xll.
Tha he complarnanr has wronsry stated rhat ihe tayour plans had been changed unilaterallyby the rerpondent lt is pen'ienft o menrion that th. locationolthesaidkioskisinconsonan.ewithwhathadbenprom$d to L\e .ohplainant and mentioned ii rhe layour plans n s p€ irenr ro CHARERi S r,rmr,mv mennon that the layour plansror rhe sard proie.tare pubti. do.unents whrh are r.adily avairible oi the orncijt webnte atrd w(h rh. otr bte RERA Authority Moreover, rhe .omphrnanr h:s app. r h:s app.,dcd d rip purportedly showing rhe lo.atioi orth. kiosk aLLeqedly handcd over ro him by the ierpondmt r the t me or book'Dg is r nexure p6 x n pe incntto netrrion rhl thcsaid napdoas notcvcn.onran !he kiosk Ln the complainant by the respondent.
Thats.vcral aLLoteer,,trcludrng thscompla'iatrt, hive delaux.d Ln nnely reNtan.e of paymcnt or ele consideration :mounr wh.h ldr dL esen.al, crudrL rnd an indispensable requirer.nt ror.on.epruJt s.rLon and development of the prc)ect in que*roi F-u he.mor, Lehetr rhe proposcd allottees derault Ln.her. paymcnk as per {hedut.asrc.d trpotr, thefaLlurehasa.as.adingeffedontheoperationsandtheco*for prepq execulon of $e projed in.reases exponeihally whcreas eNrDous busine$ loses befall upon rhe respondent 'lhe respondeDt desptre delauk ot several allones, has dthse.tly and ermenty puBued the development oIth. proje.t in question rnd has.onsruded rhe proie( rn quesion as erpedrLouny as possibtc ,: xlv copies olall the rplauant do.umenE have heetr filed ind pla.od on dre reco rd.
The n authenti.ity is mtrndLspute Hcn.c the.ompLaiir c?n bc de.ided on the bass or these undtrputed do.umcnu and subnn$on t. rurrsdlcdon oIthe authority *HARER; & cLrnLnnll., tl.Thc auihoity obseN.s that r h.s rerrtoriat as we[ as subject mrttc. lu.sdiction to adjudLcare rhe prcsenr.onplarn or the reasons givcn beLoLv 12_ As pq nd\fi1tiod na 1 /e, /20 1 7-1 rc p ddred 11.
1 2.201 7 ssu.d by.tawr.,rd couDuy Phnnins DepafrmenL the ru di..on df R.al E arc Re!(tiory authoriiy, curucr.m shdl bc entfe curusam Disr'.t for a[ purpo:e wrh o rces situated in curugtum ln th€ presenr.ase, rhe p.ojed rn que{ron is siiuared wirhin th. praniing area of curugram DEEi.r ThereJo.c. rhis authoriry h.s .ohpLer. teritoiat lurisdidion to deal wrh the p.escnt E. o subted rrer iurhdjcdon 13 sedron 11(a)Gl of rhe Ad, 2016 piovldes rhat ihe promorer rhatL be responsrble to the allofree as per agreemen( ror sh. s{tion rr(4)(al is r€produced as hereunder to) be. er to) be.5pNrh tu a abitaturs, Bp6ibrn4 d turdd\ 'hdet ke ai,hs atth6 a4 u .\e osr@4ttat nb a.bde rstueran xdkta5, 6 be 4E not b., dt the.@veorce atdt e aponnuB'p1a6o.b!di@'6de@a .onaaa {N\ b $ e oea br otdtotu kcdon 31to^ai oltr.Avb q.
31(t) otthe ad prcqds h 4y4ihprq& alth? odg nN.aa 14 so,i.viesof rheprovrionsof theadquoiedabove,rheauthontrhas.onplete iurbdiction to de.iderhe.omplaiireSardlng Don{omplrnce of oblLsrnons by * HARER.: $- c, n cnlr the pmnoter teavinS aside .ompensation which 6 ro be ,le.ided by rhe adiudi.a.nsofilcerif pu6uedbythecomptainaitatalarer:Gse 1s.Furthe. the aurho.ity has no hitch rn pro.eediig w h the.omptaint.Dd to cknt a reliefofrefund rn the pres '.tmtred vs state ol u.p. md or, (supru) and teit^otal in .an at M/s sa,a tteattots priva..
Lintted a oher vs union ol tndio st othes sLp (cteit) No.
13oo5 ol r0r0 dectded on lr.qs_ro22wherein r has been tarddownar undar: ,4"t.,, l',\ '1 oad ao !dn\\ ah, ",'''.,,,.'1-,, "-'',..o'-,',a,,N ative prcnoun.emenr ot the hon.bre sup.ehe coufr Ln rhe .ases menrioned Jbovq rhe authority hrr the lun:dtlon to enreitain a.ohplainr seeking rerund ofthe amou,t!nd inter-A$ on rhe r.fuid F, Frndingson rher€li€f souehtby th€.ohptain.hr THARER; gl GUnUGRAM \lenqaPD.bhekdL@l?lRPlu u\h@thyE *^,:._". l F.r Dtrect ih€ respond.nt to retund th. anount of Rs,ro,J2,?31/ atong lainatrr appr$ched the HoD.ble ,ltlrudr.{ns ofli@r in yer 2o2r b $ek hrund oa lhe aDount pard by rhe .ohplarnait, while urde orderdated 20.0s.20?1 th.
Hoi,ble Ad judt.&,g o i.erdiredcd the resoondentto reflnd rhe amounr paid by rhe.onpt:rianr alona wtrh inrer$ 4h"o re appP dc ,,r,"",,r.,.r", appeal no s6s of 2021 againn the eid ode. passe,r by rhe Hoihc Adjudr.arinB orrr.er Thc sahe appe,t was aitowed urde orddd*ed ?s 04 2022 and ser asid€ rhe order pasred by Hohbte Adjudi.arng ori.e. d*e,l 20.032021sati.s rh lhc ca& is remitbd for fresh raitri a..ordan.ewith lawio the tea.Ded Haryana ReatEstareAuthorry,curusram rren.., rhc urrtre\ 13 Tharthe.
3 Tharthe.oopbirrntwasallottedthesubjedutrirvideallotDemlere.d cd 06032017 for a torat sale consrderalo. of Rs 26,74s00/.
Thc huyers olTandiheduedarecomesour.obe20 oi 2021Ths oc.uprtiotr cenjfi.are was obtaiied respo'denr otfe.ed the possesion for fjr our on 1309.20?0.
19 Tha hecomphrnanrmadercqucn forsurenderottheun(on0sro2020 h ,onotm,r,dr a, , . m, ,. o-c date orhandii3 over orpose$ioD se.kris rerund again{ the rlored trnir.
20.
Funher, rheHaryana RealEn e Regutaro.y Authonty curuaEm lForferture or.aDe$moneybyrheburtde4 Rcgur.riofu, 11(slor2ors,sbtesthat *{t .omphrnant . i.res wh.h rr. not Bfun,lahte fron povernment ,nd respondeDi.prohoter.annot.harsefnnjubseque ano&easLsi provkro, f.oh'b .,,str g o,L\trr.
23,The.espondentbuilderhasalready.hargedtheJm has bRn borne by the respondenr bujlder :nd brckerage.hargesaradnissibleaspe.t,waidpardtorhesovennenr so $c HARERA GURUGRA/\4 "'-,'.,.."-"",,'", :..:"'"',"," ,;,.,;..,,;,"I;,;,;; ::o:''|:'|:'j1qd1d .*4.- nt u *a *a "a aa-" - a, n*i 21Itusdmrtroorheabdeme io6 fads thn the oephnanr pr,r iemor Rs10,32,73rl. asrinn ba!. sate.onslderation of Rs 267a,s00/ orrhe unn alrdcd oh0603.2017.
Therespondenr was bouid roa.rand respond to the /2 I hd\ oe, n trdded bl .or..d ro. .p\oo.d, nr rh" ,. r-Jd,._.r",._,. *.*,", """ Sdvernment.
The o..uparidn.ertifi catcwas obbined on 09 o3 2021 beforc duc date olhanding over ofposssrdn,.e,20 07 2021 However rhe.onDaiirnr dpo.o"rhpd.\" 4u'ho,,tuyF{1g..,",.,,.,"r"",.0, r0.,," 0",", r,. dde orh.ndins dq orp6e$ion The Authoity obse_es that the respondcDr has .lready nade paynenr towards trxss ro rhe sove.nnenai auhornes Hen.e, the responden. is eDti ed to deductfroD reruDdable amounr ro ire *HARER.
S (;rnnnnu respohdenr - bujlder h at $age to dedud the starurorl dues a.,l b.okeraee .harge ftom the alione..
24.Thus,keepingjhviewtheaforesaidr:duatandlegatprovisions,ther.spondeir .annotreraintheamountpaidbyrhecomptrjnantrsaiintha.|oredurrand h direded to.eruhd ihesamern view orrhe agrd. rrhe agrd.menr to seI roralorhe hv -oj e. dh.ih hdl,or,.",0,n",0"", .,..,.,." .onsiderationof thes dunn aDdshalrerurnrhebatan.eamountaronswrh intere$arthe mte o11o70% (the sEte Eankofrndia h,3he$ nars,nar.o{ of lendi.grate(McLRl appli.abt.as ondate+2%) as pre$ibed under.ure js ihe Haryana Re, E* e (Resutarionand Developmenr) Rules, zo17 { suhr.d to dedudion of $atlrory dues and broksrace ie 05%l ioh the dare or surender rill the actual dat. or refuDd of the anouot wirhin rhe iimdiFs provided ii rule l6oftheHaryan, Rules 2017 ib d H.
Dir.dioro of the authorjry 25 Hence, rhe aurhoriry hcrcby pas*s thjs odei and Bsues rhe rollow,ng direcrionsundersediotr 37 orrheAd to elsure .omptian.e or obris,!dns.j* upon ihe promorerasperrherun.lonenruned totheauthonrv unde.sed on 34tf): i The rcspoident h direced ro retund torhecomptaiDitthe paid up to dedudroi of narurory dues and brokerage e u.tin8 10% as earnc{ honey of the bas. $le .onsideration wlih intere$ * rhe pras.ribed rare Le., 10.7006 allow€d,fronthedateotsuftenderr[d .ofaduatrenrd 27.Theconptalntsstand d,rposed or on tfie casd frte ofeach hafrer 23.
Ftles be consi8.ed to .e8istry, 26 Tht!d(uionshajt mub s huEnduapptyro True(en'hed.op,ej orrhE ord€r be pt,.ed *". *s,'".",r,.h-,t.2;iii".