Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

CHANDER MOHAN KAPILA vs SANA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-3953-2020
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing18 May 2023
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2020

Party Details

Petitioner
  • CHANDER MOHAN KAPILA
Respondent
  • SANA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED

Case Summary

CHANDER MOHAN KAPILA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-3953-2020 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against SANA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED. The case has undergone 10 hearings over 2 years and 3 months. The case was disposed of on 18 May 2023. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (10)

  • 18MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The  present complaint has been received on 09.11.2020 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 22.01.2021. Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and annexures are as under: S. No. Heads Details 1.        Project name and location Precision Soho Tower, Setor-67, Sohna Road, Gurgaon 2.        Project area 2.46 Acre 3.        Nature of project Commercial 4.        RERA registered/not registered Not registered 5.        DTPC license no. & validity status 72 of 2009 dated 26.11.2009 Valid/renewed up to- 25.11.2019 Licensee- SH HARI SINGH 6.        Provisional allotment letter dated - 7.        Date of execution of buyer agreement 16.06.2010 [Page 40 of complaint] 8.        Due date of delivery of possession as per clause 15 of the said agreement i.e., 3 years from the date of this agreement    [Page 40 of complaint]  16.06.2013   9.        Occupation certificate 18.07.2017 10.   Offer of possession Not on record  11.   Unit no. as per the buyer’s agreement 25, ground 12.   Unit measuring 404 sq. ft. [Page 42 of reply] 13.   Total consideration Rs. 28,42,740/- (as per page no. 42 of complaint)   14.   Total amount paid by the                         complainant Rs. 26,10,470/-   15.   Remarks, if any ---   1.     Direct the Respondent to give immediate possession of the unit of the above mentioned to Complainant along with prescribed interest per month from the date promised for delivery of possession till the actual possession is handed over to the Complainant of the unit in a habitable condition and/or alternatively. 2.     Direct the Respondent to provide with all the amenities and facilities as mentioned in its Brochure/advertisements and cure structural defects within 30 days from the final adjudication of the pre- sent complaint. 3.     To restrain the Respondent from raising any demand of maintenance before the actual delivery of possession and before the completion of one month after the actual delivery of possession of the unit. The counsel for the respondent requests for an adjournment as the respondent wishes to settle the matter amicably with the complainant  but the complainant states that during last proceedings also an assurance of amicable settlement was given but no efforts has been made by the respondent to amicably settle the matter and hence, requests for early order as the complainant has been waiting for the unit for more than last 10 years while OC of the unit has been received in 2019 and unit is ready for handing over. The complainant is requesting for grant of DPC and direction for handing over the possession as per statutory rights under section 18 (1) of the Act,  2016 at the prescribed rate of interest i.e., 10.70% p.a. for every month of delay on the amount paid by the complainant to the respondent. Accordingly the delayed possession charges are allowed at the prescribed rate of interest i.e., 10.70% p.a. for every month of delay on the amount paid by the complainant to the respondent. Respondent shall handover the possession to the complainant within one month. 4.     To restrain the Respondent from raising any demand of final payment with interest and holding charges from the Complainant presently and in future. The respondents shall not charge anything from the complainant which is not the part of the agreement. However, holding charges shall also not be charged by the promoter at any point of time even after being part of agreement as per law settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in civil appeal no. 3864-3889/2020 dated 14.12.2020. Matter stands disposed off.  Detailed order will follow. File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 27APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint has been received on 09.11.2020 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 22.01.2021. Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and annexures are as under: S. No. Heads Details 1.        Project name and location Precision Soho Tower, Setor-67, Sohna Road, Gurgaon 2.        Project area 2.46 Acre 3.        Nature of project Commercial 4.        RERA registered/not registered Not registered 5.        DTPC license no. & validity status 72 of 2009 dated 26.11.2009 Valid/renewed up to- 25.11.2019 Licensee- SH HARI SINGH 6.        Provisional allotment letter dated - 7.        Date of execution of buyer agreement 16.06.2010 [Page 35 of complaint] 8.        Due date of delivery of possession as per clause 15 of the said agreement i.e., 3 years from the date of this agreement    [Page 40 of complaint]  16.06.2013   9.        Occupation certificate 18.07.2017 10.   Offer of possession Not on record  11.   Unit no. as per the buyer’s agreement 25, ground 12.   Unit measuring 404 sq. ft. [Page 42 of reply] 13.   Total consideration Rs. 28,42,740/-   14.   Total amount paid by the                         complainant Rs. 26,10,470/-  as per page 35 of the rejoinder attaching certificate of the respondent   15.   Remarks, if any     The counsel for the complainant submits a copy of the order passed by Hon’ble State Consumer Commission on 27.02.2023 withdrawing the complaint pending before the Commission to pursue the matter before RERA.    The counsel for the complainant requests for grant of DPC as well as handing over of possession as there has been inordinate delay  in handing over of possession on the part of the respondent despite having paid more than 90% of the consideration amount.   The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment as there are fair chances of amicable settlement with the complainant including handing over of possession within next 2 weeks and also requests for filing of written submissions. The counsel for the respondent states that offer of possession after obtaining OC has already been made on 17.10.2019. Arguments heard.   Both the counsels request for filing of written submissions which may be filed after supplying a copy to each other within 10 days.   Matter to come up on 18.05.2023  for final arguments and order, if matter is not amicably settled including  handing over of possession to the complainant allottee by that time

    Stage: PENDING

  • 31JAN 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The counsel for the complainant seeks a short adjournment for withdrawing the complaint in the State Commission which was filed on the same grounds. Matter to come up on 27.04.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3JAN 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The proxy counsel for the complainant requests that the respondent be directed to give possession of the unit alongwith delayed possession charges at the prescribed rate of interest and the cancellation notices issued be withdrawn as the  complainant allottee has already made more than 90% of the consideration amount and after adjustment of delayed possession charges,  no more amount remains to be paid by the complainant allottee  and hence there is no justification whatsoever for resorting to cancellation of the unit by the respondent.  The respondent be also directed to supply the copy of OC received from the competent authority in respect of unit of the complainant and the complainant is ready to pay the outstanding amount as per the BBA only and  after adjusting the DPC.  The proxy counsel for the respondent states at bar that the respondent is in process to amicably settle the matter with the complainant including handing over of possession of the unit for which occupation certificate has already been obtained way back in the year 2017 and if the matter is not amicably settled,  the respondent would move an application alongwith requisite fee for mediation before the authority within 3 weeks. Matter to come up on 31.01.2023 for taking a view  on the application, if filed by the respondent for mediation. The proxy counsel for the complainant requests to restrain the respondent from creation of third party rights in respect of unit allotted to the complainant and accordingly respondent is  directed not to create third party rights with regard to the unit allotted to the complainant till the next date of hearing. Matter to come up on 31.01.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26OCT 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The counsel for the respondent has stated at bar that M/s Sana Realtors Pvt. Ltd. has filed SLP bearing No.13005 of 2020 in the Hon’ble Supreme Court  of India  against the order dated 16.10.2020 passed by the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWP No.34271 of 2019  which is still pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.              A copy of the said order dated 05.11.2020 has been placed on record by the counsel for the respondent.                  Keeping in view the pendency of the SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court  of India,  the matter is adjourned sine die till the final decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: SINE DIE

  • 10SEP 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SAMIR KUMAR

    Main counsel on behalf of the respondent is not present. The matter has been partly heard. The issue raised by the counsel for the complainant  is that the respondent/promoter has not received completion certificate/part completion certificate.  Besides this,  the complainant has not received offer of possession as on date. The respondent is directed to respond/reply to this specific question as to whether they have received any completion certificate for the project or not.                Main counsel for the respondent to appear in person on the next date of hearing alongwith the specific reply.                 Matter to come up on 26.10.2021 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3AUG 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SAMIR KUMAR

    The counsel for the respondent has stated at bar that M/s Sana Realtors Pvt. Ltd. has filed SLP bearing No.13005 of 2020 in the Hon’ble Supreme Court  of India  against the order dated 16.10.2020 passed by the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWP No.34271 of 2019  which is still pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.            A copy of the said order has been placed on record by the counsel for the respondent.                 Matter to come up on 10.09.2021 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 19MAY 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter to come up on  03.08.2021 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30MAR 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR

    Vide resolution No.6866 dated 26.03.2021 District Bar Association Gurugram has conveyed that on the occasion of festival “Holi”,  30.03.2021 has been declared as local holiday in District Court Gurugram and requested to adjourn the cases as per convenience of the Authority.             Matter to come up on 19.5.2021.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28JAN 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH

    Vide Resolution No.6679 dated 28.01.2021, District Bar Association, Gurugram has conveyed that on account of sad demise  of Shri  Gyasi Ram Yadav, Senior Advocate,  court work shall  remain suspended.                       Matter is adjourned to 30.03.2021 for the same purpose.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (10)