MS MURLI INFRATECH LLP vs IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT.LTD.

*!]ARERA S- anlR{r(,aAM BEFORE'IH6 HARY,{XA REAL ESTATE REGUItrTTORY AUTIIOiITY, o.de.R.s€reOn: Ord€r P.onounce on: 31.0J.2o23 M/SIR6OCRnCtrRIALTE'H PVT.LTD tiffi MtM*rr hrr{h LLP v/s M/!

I Thr o rder shall dispose ofaU the tuo.omplaints titled above frtedbero.e this suthority uider sdion 31 ot the Real Esate (Resuta.on .id Developh.no Act, 2016 (hereinafter refeftd as "the Act,l E.d L{th rule 23 or the Haryana Real Estate (Rquladon ad Derclophsno Rules, 2017 (heEinafter Ererred s th. tules") ror vtolaflon olsection 11(a)(al orthe Act wherein ft is inter alia pftsnbed th.! th. prcmoter shal be i.rponsible for all ih obligatio.s, Bpomibilties and tundlons to tne allotes a per the a3r*menr tor sale ffiuted tnts. se berween partes.

IHARERA s a;rrnLrcnAM The oE iss!6 ehdatln8 tron ihem ar. slmllar in @ture and the omplainanlGl in the above referred mt.a aE allotts ot th. prcject, naDely, The CoridoB situated at SdoF67.4 GlnEEh b.lhg dev.loped by the same lespondent/prcmot.r i..., M/3 h€d ftae R.alt .h A^.

Ltd.

11€ t .ms and co.ditions oI the buyet's agx€emenB frilcrum of the lss ue irvolved in all these c6es Deulns to Lllure on tho p.n of th. promdter to dellv.r dhely pos*ssion ofthe unib in quatioq se.king posesioD or rhe unit,lonE wth delayed Der&$.rs6 ,n. o"r*, ". -.rur,l;ffitu! un., no.. da'. oras,..r.n,. o***." o-*, a," a"r"ffi"*bt.l s.re.on,der.Dor tour ,.0,."-,. ""0,"'/d iCJllltrdoo'" 0o.", M/s Prc. doi R4ho8 P{ Ld ,Dd vide373d2017 ed 071rr0tr(P r1l vide377of 2017dared07.1, ?0r7 tPhrcr) vrd.37eor4rdEd07 r r0r7irt e, PhasITow(rfuA5'8533,c3c11'c1aM tthh&ruemsrbutootLinid bmenndy lcHARERA S GTTRTTGRAM d{ruhR'b6e"hrFrqBrcri d nspr.rib€dbyth..omezny,lh!hnpdy prcmndii6n5 inpqed th.rulndstGnniinot pqioo. rhe Alton.. runh( ases d:ys (ora.e P.nodl, atur $e dpiry o (edad 6on ths dde daee qa{& ]R tEl GR fs HARERA GI]RI]GRAM t( H dl G !

A ?l LI T ?r IE rGt IJ hEG tA \M orer rn rhe bble Ererrcd .bove e rhcy a.e elrbor.cd c tunowt Jr *HARERA !l-anrGRAM The aroresaid compl. aid compl.inB were filed bt ih. .onplaiMnts against the pronoter on acounr oI vlolasoh of th€ builder buyeis ag@ment srp'Lcdbetu€nrhepatre(rr.(p.dolraidun \forno' handrngover the possession by nie due dato, s..khg th. physiql possesion of the unit alo.c with debyed po$essio! char8es.

It has been decided to ke.t t5e sald .ohplatna as an applimtion ror .on- conpliane of statuto.y obligations on the p.rt of the pbmotar aurhoitytocnsurc.omplian.e. der the Ad, the rules and the neo9 7 Th.part(trlarso,theprojed,thed.tailsolsalc.onsnlcfrton th.rn,otrnr cRBao0/201e M/s Mudt rhfftte.h LLP v/s M/s rtu crue Redhe.h paid bythe compl.'nan(r, da E HARERA GURUGMM Mr PredsroD Rqrtos P* Lid. d s rusi#d s p4 '*t * ,l 4 v'de373dror7d ed071,201r(turc 1) I xG AI Y.vL" ,"* .,. * ", Gmdue R5 on Gmdue R5 on I #HARERA !!-GInIGRAM D. ! ',?$3; HAI Gr.lRt ai/ P{iodl flrf ^roce i.6, *d -d""."d" d th" sh.ll addil]oeny be endded to GEm"ffi':.;'i,::::ffi; ,9.ll.aroluIlfu$a d.r,}s beymd rhe r(ssr[r6lli4md or th! compan, ---.1 - CHARERA $- cL nrr,nnur That the omplainant bei.g lured by the represenations made by the respo.dent decided to nake application for the booking iD tne prcjed .anely, IEo comidors situated at r*tor67 A, Guru8bb and paid a boo klng anount dt Ps.

13,00,000/-.

Thar believi.g the assu.anes of the .espondent, the conplaimnt tudhe. nade th. paym.nr of Rs 1 1,39,624l-. upo n such payments, the Bpo nd en t ror su.n r.olm.i!

19.042016, *HARERA S-arntrr,mv kued the ofer ol allotment le@r b th. [email protected] along with their sbda.d d.aft ol tne apartment buy.r .3Eenenl 10.

That upon petuslnp the o6e. ol allottnent lder .nd its rms and condinont the.obplainant w6 shocted in dGmay, 11.

Thatthecompl.lnant.fterperusal olth.d.aft olagremeDrweretu(her shock d a th.E was .o scopr fo. the cooplainant to seel( ompenettdn fo! the delay, but on the other h.nd th. respondent had .ndden itselr io .ha.s. io .ha.s. hus" GE or inEro$ E?6)e ":lffi ::11':ff ffi ':: T::ffi #:il::T :::i:::: ::::Mm** bu'€ts as*m"n' h - - -.:;-,-.- J&1. - .., " ^,*.)hL. -,.,. * i::#:#"My;mil:fr , wtg};;* rn x Liffi ' ; t."M,kt ll : *b, MRI-: x#tr# q. --, "rlJf,du&ryll.dlor6'r'rtotu de hb @ #try#.*#f#;:;t:Tv;:';: po,lNo'olh. tu r?odfia& ak@ ddn o p.thd ol k ;i#v';wwRWPiNv!!;H; Pale t 14"a a@tud4ds6 d! rdt odo,bd j'h1e14vc{Ar&ttlta4co^ rco6 k-e'l "r- n -p,\<FtL it6cLl,r@,lt1tuwk t",,@*, detry brynd .ne MNbk Mnot alth. caiNry " 13.

That th€ buildiq plans lo. the prcled Erc apprcv€d on 23.07.2013 by the DrreenE of Town & country Pl.nnrn& H.ryana sedor-l3, Ch.ndigarh.

The r$pondent ws suDposd to deliver the po$ession ofthe apanDent latest by Ja.uary 2017 il w. calculate this penod 6om the daie of app.oval of th. bulldhr plan i.e, 23.07.2013.

Th. llon bl.

Nadonal t *, E48IRA GURL]G|iAM Consumercommhsioninthc.as.of Vishal Duavetsus lreo Cra.e ReaLte.h Pvt.

Ltd. cCl2a$/2017 aCo upheld this.ontcntion olthe aLLottees.

14.

That ihe respo.dent was supposed to dclivcr the possesson ol the rp,tnent withii a peiod of3 year, which is thc reasonable lhe penod ror the deLivery ol the apadmcnt.

That even if thrce yeaE are cahulated rrom rhe dare orofier orallotment, ihe tine pcriod forthedelivery wotr d .onc out to be 0703.2016.

Tha .onp.tryhrr delivered theposessionolthe apartdent 1s.

Thc.omplainant lirm has made more payment than the total p'oposed .onsideralon orthe apartm€rt 6ut d.rpire this, the respondent .oD,pany had railed to delivcrth. apaMent eitherwithiD the pmposed and asured time peiiod or withu the reasonable timc pe.iod. .o-Ddn, rd. dtopo..d to (omple'e'h" oo!a .o notberorelunc z02l whi.hil h.s proDosed r!severalother.ases pend,ig bcfore th$ Hon ble Authonty.

The.i(unsbn.er ofthe.onpla'Mtrr rim do not pernit the.ompany to.o.tinue w*h the booking in ihe pm,.d ol rhe resDondent .ompany and thereiore !t is onLy appmpriatc thar the noDey paid by the. id by the.omplalnantfirmbe renrnded along with 13% iitere$ c.

Rellef sought by $e @nplalnant . u.

The omprainani has soudt rollowlq Flie(rl i.

Dlred tb. rdpondent to retutrd ilre amount b th. turc of Ps.

44,s6,005/. to thc @mrlalMnt d.4 Llth 1a% htercsi frem rte dlte ol payn.nt md. by th€ @Eplat@t d0 tn. d.b I}HARERA SGLrnu(,RAM t.

Direct the re$ond.ht to paya sum ofRs.50,000/- as llng.tion cxDenses to the complalnani 13 0n the date or hearins, thc authority explained to the responde,t/ promoter about the .ontavenrions .s alleged ro have heen.ommittd rn reration b sdion 11(4) (al orrhaadtopreadguilvor nottopreadsuirty D.

Reply by the r€spondent The Bsponde n t has .onte$. d thecomplaintoi the rollowingg'ounds r9 That ihe.omplaint 6 netherDailtaDable nortenableand B lisbl.to be outishdy dismisled.

Th. apalgEn, betueen thc padies prio.io the ehadment ofthe R$lEdatc lRegultrt on and Dcvelopmentl A.L 2016 and the provisions laid down in the saLd Ad .annot be appLied rttuspedrvely 20.

Thatthereis no.aNeof acho.bfi 13thopreentcomplaint.

21 Thatthc.omplarnanrhasnolo.usnaditohletheprcsentcompLaN 22 That the respondent has frled lhe present reply w(hin the peiod ol Limitation as pcr the prcvisions of Real E$ate (Regulation id Developnentl Act ?016.

23 That thc.omplrintisnotmaintalnable for the reason that the igreement .ontains an arbihaiion dause whtrh rcreB to the dispute resolution ne.hanrD to be adopted by the padies ln the avenr orany dispuE ia .lause 3s of the buyes asreement ?4.

Th rhe.omplainant hd notapproa.hed thE authoiry with dern hinds .nd have intcntionilly suppresed and con.ealed the natenrl tuas The present.ompliint has been fi led malicioudy wjth an ultenor notive and c nothrnEbu!a shperabuse of thepro.es of law.The rue and.orcd ftr.b THARERA {}Gnrlc?AM 25, Th.t the omDlainant, afte. ch*l@g the v.n uy of th. pmjd mmel, 'Cotridoi sector 67-A, Gurug.am appli.d tor allotdent ot d apann.nt vide booking apDliatio! fo.m and agreed to h. bound b, th. und b, th. ems and @ndidons sdpulrted the.ein.

26.

That based on rhe appuatlon 60r booldn& the Bpo.dent vide its lefter dated 07,03.2013 allotted to tn€ mDplahant ,pafr€nt no, cD'c3'00 001 havins bnbtl* super .Ea o, 1305,96 sq. ,t fo. a tobl sale cotuld.radon or Rs r.44 sO,Sq r /.. vid. hH{I!|*lo.or 2ol a. the respondenr snr r ;: :;:l];::H::',*m::ffi ii:'I ::TJjr **o oo,.,,,o *,,6DdlJIr4D,r *.,**,*, ,,. '*' ,",,.*r$6iri*J*)rtd" r*ponden, had ruDeo Lh. d.n:nd bmJsilrd ininhdn nJ&o\ ner unbk dmo,d or *,.,r.r,.urun. *14f, ,,rtr1T't,lL"hJ6[o *" r" *-" -', ."..;.il,,.\av&s,I "ll" IJG/,. """ ,","" ", ,," ft,pondenl \S"x--l--nlZ.s7 2s. rhd qde payned FqX&!6,rfis rhe Espond.it had 6'*d :I;1:,}"#'T:[ff4ffi HHffi :'Tffi I "::: ,3 04,01s.d,"-@tjR{,G'RAMeamounta.d,hs sane Ms adjusted in the hext hsElment derond a aftd.

29.

That lrde payment Equei dad 03.02.2016, towards dE 6ftn iDstallnent denand for Det palable amoDnt of Rs 3602637/-. fioEvei the complai.ant yet aSaln Llled to rcnit the du. amount d€sp,te reDindets datsd 29.02.2016.nd 23.03.2016 dd the due amount and die sme was adlusEd in the nert insl6.nt d.mnd, *HARERA # arnLr,nar,r 30.Thar vide paymsnt rcque* dared 23.03.2016 towards ihe mth in*allment demand for net payable amount oI Rs s3,03,537l However the.omplarnanr yet asai. lailed to remr the due amount despite rennMer dared 19 04.2016 and 11.05 2016 and the due amolnt rnd dE same was adjuned ir rhe idxr in{almentdemaDd l1 Thatvidc payment reque* dated ?6.04.2016,the respondeDr rrnad rhe dan:id towards sevdnth innallmentdemand ror net payabLe amount olRs.

67,0s,409/-. nowNei despite rehrDdeis dared 24.0s.20r6 and r7 06 20r6 rhe.ohpLainant larleil tb rmit th-a due amouir and dre inre wsadjuned h rhe m{,nsElnentdemand asarear.

32 Th vid. payhent requen d:ted 02.06.2016, the rcspondetrt ra6ed rhe demandrowa s eighth insollmentdehand for netpayable amountor Rs 79,60,9s9l-.

Howmi despite remindeB dated 29.06.2016 and 22.07.2016 and iinal noticc dated 23.03.2016 the. .2016 the.omprarmtrr frLLed ro remit the 'lue amountand the samewas adlu$ed in the nextinsbLnErr 33 That vide payment request dated 03.03.20r6, the respondent r$ed (he demrnd towardsnhth in*allnontdem dfornetpayablean,ountorRs 92,r6,s0s/ Howevei the complainantyet again Iail.d to.cmitthe due 34 'Ihit thecompl.,inant 6 a real to earn quick profit Ln r sho p.riod ngon,ccountof stump ir rhe rerL e$ar narket and the complainant did n co'n'hihents 0n i.counr olioi fulfilment ofthe contadualoblisations respoMeir, the illormenr ol the .omplainant was .an..rrcd, aDd rhr 13 HARERA S c,LrnEnm,l eamest roney Ms forfeited vide Gn.ellatton ler dabd 01.09.2016 in aEordane with clause 21 rcad f,nth .lau* 7.4 dt th. arartsnent buyer zCEement.

Howdei on the Equd of th. onplalnan! dE Epondent bei.ga stomer-oriented.omp.ny h.s Bor€d tlte allohent of$e unit, subl.d to etuin conditioro and the sane Ms t.dm.ted b rhe coDplainant vide the emajl dated 30,05,2017, 35.

That the pos*sion of th. u.rt Ms supposed to b. o6e.ed to the omp..'nant h .cord.nce v$d*rls€.d Ems tud ohdrdom or,\. buv.,.\ as,.rm.n,. , ',,fd$Effii-, c,,use r3.3 o, the olyer, **".*,."0 o** ", "r,,dHffifrL..orth. bookrdaDDr,c,don,om ::1:::j;:: : mmt: ::;:XH:: I I*:*Tffiffi ;:ff .}T::Hffi HHBffi I[,':'#;:JJi:] c'** 13 s "f ,h" @h.,,t+t €f+AM 36.

That from dE aforesaid tens of the buyer's aereement, it is evident that the rine was b be conput€d frcn thc daE of recrpt of all r.qursir apprcwls, Even otheruise coDstru.lion can t be Eised io tne abseie of the .ece$ary apprcvals. lt is pe.tine.t to n€ntion hen that it has been sp*ifred ln sub- .lause (lvl of claa.

17 of th. approval of bu,ldl4 plan dard 23.07.2013 of the sard pro,ed thar the cleaEnce rssDed by rhe Mi.istry or Environnent and Fo.est, Goremment of lndia has to be obr.iDed befoE startirg lne construction of the prcject- The environment clealance lor @nstruction oithe s.ld pmjed was Branbd on 12.12.2013.

2.12.2013.

Furthemorq in clause 39 of part'A of th€ eDvironmen! cl€amne dat.d 12.12.2013itwasst tedthathEeteryplanwarobedulyapprov.d by th.

6E depatuent belorc the start ot ary onsmctlon worli .t sue.

37, That the las of the stutory .Dprovals whLh toms a patr ot the pre. conditions Ms rhe 6ro scheme app.o%l which was obtained o. f HARERA $- cr rnr ra,nAM fferins the posse$ion, according to the a8reed t€rms of the sreement, will expned only o. of ofering the pGsesion.s ,l E lurledlctunoftheaurhor 19. lhe horly obsewes thd jt hJr ietriron as wel is subred ntLe. jurhdrction to adjudrate the preren! .omplaint for the reasons given E,r Tcrrrtorral lurlsd, dlo n 40. ^s per notifrcation no. ,/92lz017lrcP .tated 1412,2017 )sste,J by afrmenr, ihe jurkdi.tion of Rear E$a,e Regulatory Authority, Curugnm shall be entire curusram Dishict for alL purpose with om.essitu ed in Curugnm ln the presentcase, the prolect in que$ion G situated within the plannine ara of curusram Dktii.t *& Thercfo.e, thk authori!, has.ohptete te toriat junsdiction todeatwith E,Ir snbi€.tDancr,urtsdr.ion 41. secnoD 11[4]ia) of tne a.r, EspoBtbte b tho altohe as Eproduced as b€.euhderl 2016 prcvides thar the prchoter shal be per aerehent ro. saro s€.rioh rt(4)(a) h i; *" ,,",",,, "h",, r, :,-.N " " 4 .-ootbdut _a.,t..- a_t .,o,. a-"d,lba." '.d".o.-'.",,, ,; ). kaiq 34 F!n6: ot d. adrtky: 'lt ''""* ' ^i.floe.ne.o- p 4nr r s..o,nq obrisatiois by the pronoter teaving aside .ompensation whi.h k ro be dc.ided hy the adiudicating officer irpuEUed hy thc.ohplarnanr at a rrtrr 43.

Fu(hcr, rhc aurhority has no h&h if pro.eediig wi.h rhe com0taintind to srant a relicrotrcrund in Ue presenr marer in vicw ofihe,ud8e,refr passed by the Hon bte Apex court in Newtech ptono@$ and Dereropers Prilab Limhed vs stab ol u.p, and oB.

2021.20244 RCRIc)3s7 ,nd retbrared in .ay ofv/s sana ReottoT pnvare Linked e athet vs union oI rndta & othef sLp (ctvit) No.

13\os oJ 2o2o de.ide.t on r2rs,20?zrvher.

20?zrvher.in n hasbecn lai HARERA GUR(]GllAM * HARERA s ctrRtr,RAr,/ "36 hh rhe eh.n. al d. adbt phid a debid retsr4P 16 b8 ndr ald bkhq not al Nwt at adju rcetbrq odhqi, oad odtrdnod@ ofiet, ||ho. fhottt .!tk att n 6 @i@' hke renrd, '1rrt$r,'@otE ont ahprnndan, o @niainbedip ols4tun' 13 ord 1e cba t hontl* at d fr dn{ b r4ud ottte anou. otdnter4r L\e.eturd lnaunl u dttcd@ d.bwd etitrry olpd*$bn, v Fad.! olnah. dld .anPtqhL At he nn. ti@ ol:eekhs L\e rettut al odjudol@ ehe ohiection r€s.rdins jurisdi € conDlaint v.it the aDa(mcn( tenable and is liable to be ouhighily dis m kse d as the buyeE asreenent was executed between the complahants.nd the respondent pnor to the 46.

The authority is or the view that the provisions or the A.t are quasi ention a.d will & applicable to the agresmenh forsaleenteredinto *enpriorto.odlnglnto operationolthe * db HARERA GURUGllAI/ nowhere provld6, nor c.n h. so contued $al all prcvtou agrements would be re'writen afrer .oming Into foEC of the Acl, Therefore the provisions ofthe Act, rules and 4Ement h.ve to be .sd ad i.terpEted h.monioudy.

Howevci if the A.t h.s prcvld.d for d€.ltn8 wtth ..nain specioc p.ovisions/situation iD a spsific/partcular Dan€., then that srtuatron wolld be d€.lt w,t5 In .eord.n@ wuh the ad and th€ rules atur the date or @nin8 iDto fo.e ot ihe Act and th. .ules Tn€ Dunercus ploqslon<ortheaa eve thqn6&r!q or the rsreemenB mcde beryc.n rhe buyeB rnd $rsB *$ffiry""',"" has b*n upherd 'n the r,"a.,, I ruamat * rrer,xmfi*crr suburboa ,r Ld v: uot ::.,j,.-o,",,4frqffi"\,-,2whtrhpbedesa. ,,.,.-, "lflk", ^*ar^ "\hI " --,. "* * paesb4 td4r. .4,.td,1t0'p.h& Fa+n.d F r. qwiqt v. :*,i3#}efl P Vtr tr #" vHl!tri,**il" N., F t\q*\! al a& "l.&t@fi .,Bh^ i aa".

6, e,. "d- rrube\C.&!iL6*!/@ ,,, fi! {;}\trilw'ilH; 4., ^* " " :ffiffiffiffiwffif#iffi," aqp.nt wn daahq t lk etft,t a h"li"** ndl -4ht hhtr,li ryr^b\ duiatlittrlowpu dt+Ea t.@N,tuw non.d h drtdqd ptbtn hd* oner o 6qo!9h stod! otu db.lstu ndd. ct h. ndd. ct h. hbhd hwt q the studt4q bnnn@ ord s.t .t ctu, whnr 'lbnt ..d iE 47.

Funhei ln appeal no.

173 of2019 nnd I Ndgtc Ey.

Da.lopd ha Lkl, vs, lshwq stngh Dohuo, in ord.r dated 17.12.2019 th€ H.rt€na Real E$te AppeUaft Triblml has ob*fled' THARERA lS- (,uRIGRAM 43.

The aa.eemenb aft sadosanct s.ve and except ror the pmvisions which havebeen abrogated by the Ad ei it b noted th.t thebuilder h!)er:g eenreiE hlcbc"n lhe mannerthatthe.e is no scops i1. f hut kpbs in vhw bu. ald8dd ee4 w . o! the Btd4er q.1pa t tuktuPws n oltr"kt d.r ot:?/d.twa at poe ,q a F 4. htu oad a1dt6' oI4. osr@4r h. ah the o btushdt b. d tudbd.t .Bt/d.tatd 13 al de rut$ oad q. 'idd, 'ahn qad lr@erdbh rua qr a4t ht dE . hbh r b- dr)h.ve men.onedreasons thc reason that the asreehent contains an atuitation clausewhich reres to thedisputeresolulonmecha.ismrobe.doptedbythepadies intheevent of anydisputeandthe sahe isreprodued belowforthereadyreierei.c: .35'uqube$funonbJAftball the Ern' ot ilr As@nent u iB rt.n nh@rtutiol and votditt aJ the Et thu%J a'd the *EAI?ERA q a nLTGRAM Bpedle tuha ard abrttadNr oldtt Po ontaht! b! ntud dtntur' h tto{h vad anlth 1lczne b a ek /dtnw 6 be owhEd b! d Botuaod oJth tutd [email protected]. dacd snon b.naohld btrdi@ uPo^d1 h.db! d^nm' .ttu t tur now no oqetun b 6. oNatudt ol e.h eb atbtuw ea t th. p@ n opphd, harapbtr. ad|.Nb o! rh. caipqry ot B [email protected]' ht .hot.ae. n tr. ntupzleg+p. npo*t| ot d, flttt sb ,atnd to @d!dl*&trn hE adtmnon u@da 'r tu 'X,,8F8,1}'. ^dnood Md ',^",","" ^ tsq )ffiiffiaao onaa.z,tt ^d k - h- d.e @ onfl A tffi ;8;i*.

N wv s ofi 6 #.:-xi:;lffisitr:il,r. a;d a,t bJAi 'nlffirffiN,i(ilt(@' / sho? ht t?4lit$dt@tu n ehan4ve\ so rh..uiro"+,.ol6,[p,hdfh-J'rlir],r.[dl",r'"*,r'*,v'-*, h" h**d b, ,h|B}*A*l"rl",ll",Ir,l4&J a** * ". u,v"'' ***" *" *,\S[,Spf{fl'Adbasu''unsd'rco1 "r ""rr -,tu ,b*, "bi6lE',FdoDlit'< w.thrn rhe puM* or rhb IU:I.;:::;,HffM#,A]:::i,:::[::;: d rhe An sys rharA rcYr){nlrlgB'rfllrrie ln addrdon b dnor , a. .r*- "r*"V"vn. "r*"V"vn.)'V,Mb,i+rJ$ /"1,n. d,"b""cr" r"." Furth€r. the authoritv outs Elidc. on @bn. or ju4ments or the Hon'ble srpreme court, padr.ularly In rvod@l Seeds cotPoQde Ltnttzd v tlo.tluudnon Red.ty e anl (2072) 2 scc so6 wh*h it h* b"' held that the renedies provtded under tl,. consund Prct'dlon ad are in addtrionto d not in de.otatlon ol th. othe. larc io foEe, @D€quendv *HARERA 4- crmrr,tunt th. authonty would not be bouDd to retur p.rties to arblFldon een lf ihe acrenent beesen the p.rties had d erbitr.tion clause Sl.Ftttttet, in4ltob Slath and o* u Ettu tlCF Laad Lrn od 06" cor er @ no 707 61 2015 t .clded M 1j.07.2017, rh.

N.tioaal Consuner Dcputes RedBs.l CoFmisdon, New Delhi (NCDRC) has held that the arbit.adon.l.us in agreements td.en the .omplainant and builder could not ci.onscnbe the iundhlon ofa conslnei The Elevant ea6 are reercducd bebw: .trr&.1!, bt \.dd'a ol d.$.ntu @ d tuc,;idtea,b"h dD,*bpr@tta t bt6 0w 'od a\. p,t Pae Aa1 sedoa E ott\. ntd ^d rtdd' u lotba as tu,di,, na-Na ,t oud 'ror ra@ tt\ \1onb .,,"",," ;;. *,,,.*dM' @ t ron^ u tbodtudmnNafr4'd i. awrr ntbtad u *""*.,4fufre1da^dhd.u -;ab -;*a 'ry-'"-"d*, "turoip^o bD.d,lrFo\ a'Qdouqw 6*n'd bt { lr ll Iir]i karthu'b"krtn 6; nd pntu aastvotB d'. ju.ituntunat.r. ct t coud h Ar.iofont hdtut 'hidt d,.tut Etud kqbbryau.ro'itt tubtlhrd lrdi stb dan (11 ol tur 2a or tu aditdtudq afret i-"-, .-bbre ,ro( s.tual .' ot tur ohh.

E@ dt iqtd. (tur nLAMeo \ tuoat tie Fotur'/dto R-, ;;." t-, ,;,",*"d . d-'d, h-. ^^L -, ".tu a r. dto,u tur'q h' ten@ \'tu trz .";-*.,.1 \ 7irl \U\71\/ llVi sd Lors,.au' * ,,hE nd@u ed d. r?rndd aa entl at dr 8,,r" ,i,6d 6d ^ ar'uou tute b th otooeced h'd ot Aort.aBr.fun,h.Lon,lononEr ti" r*atoq q, ro*.. t"- nw s2.

While onsi;reflng th. issue of Daintalmbilitv of a comPlai't b'fore a consumsi forum/@nnlssion i. dre tad of aD .xhd4 arbitatlon cl'use in the bullder buyer asreenent, the HoD'ble supreme Coud ln e* rtd€d ts *HARERA S r,Lrrrrrc*lrvr M/s EmarMct ljnd Ltd. v.

Aft. d. v.

Aft.b slryh in revisio.petitionno.2629. d. ob@ ond pLtpo ol,n td6 d.onsidenhstheprovkions ru&:;trtr;l:.1: 3ol2014 inclvtl appeal nd 23512-23513 of 2017 d*ld€d on 10.12,20la has upheldtheafo.esaidlud8enentof NCDRCands prcvid.d rnAdi.le 141 of theconsiibdohof India, thelawde.laedbyrhesupreme cdun shall be bindiq on all courts within the tedtory ot lndia and a.cordlngl, the authoriiy is bound by the aforesaid view.

The relevant para of lhe judeenent pased by the Sup.em€ coun ls reprcduced below 2t fhb con h .te erns oI jtdtn r prcvbpE ol bnhi Mn a41 hiP@Adbl^gos4dll nda ntid q co$unq Faruh en lu d a"ran!

D.^$tr1s' -@; a.,1.. ,-@. rc. an o rr. e ha6 ou o e@tun tl wtuw noe q c ahptoiro 16 oha b..r dDkhed h k tun rl.) of6.adhr rtnat undq ti. cq hoPn@6Dn Ai n *,fihd b il.pb.tbt td*'h.rosdetnd wet rh. adlu d4d u d.t kras.qwd btc wprcitu,k dept a qunk rth.dt ho: ronsumer Prot<[.r n t mt allf\afti2ar( Inrl ,.',,.,,,..,."."'"/d" "t*Edl"1{ il};" tain thecomplamrand thar the displte doesnorrequirctoberefe ed to albiFation necesarilv ln thelightolthe ,bove.mentioned reaso.s, theauthoritvis of theviewthattheobledionor the Espondent sbnds reiected.

G.

Enarbm€ntorth€conpLlnantrorr.fund: 13HARERA !S Crnlr,nrur E Dlred th€ respond.nr to rctu..I th€ anount ro the run. of Ri aa,s60o5/- to rh. ohplaina alona wt$ la% ht€.6r froh rh. dare or paym€nt had. ty dle conpt.lmni flr tne d.te ot 54.

The onphlha,t has bmlied th. r*ld€ndal aparts .nt,n th. prcject haned as 'The Corrrdor3 rtuated .t lel 67 a to. . tot t s.le onsldfl rhon ol R.

L41.50,39 t /dr oI shich h h.s md. payh.nr oI R).

41.s6.oos/.. rh. ompraimqffimi th. ,h.v.-men,ioned u.r qde ruohmt leer d*ed o?.08.Aaryapamen buy.r aare.men, wa\ "j'h*Htffimx;:r:; -p*, "r u*r{,fi fpr"ry41,61h.,1b}**""*,.*,* ."**T,*I'W,II*H*;;; ::il[i J ;::ffA'Mffi h* ;*H:]H: "-,","'."".""GUR{JGRA[/.d.F",edied,he.h The marcr k ov.red und€. sdion 1a0l ofth€ Ad of2016.

57. rh. du. date of po$6lon s Der .8'!m.nt hr sl.

6 Eotioned in the bble ab@e is 23.01. is 23.01.2017 and th€r€ ts d.Ly of2 yac 7 nonths 12 days on ttie date offiliDg ofthe complainl, 5& Th. ocopadon erdfiote /part ocdpadon ..rnnaE of th€ buildings/toweB wh.E alid€d unu of d,. conDLlnant ls sloaEd ts I}HARERA S-c;rnrrr,nnl,r reelved aner nl,ng of application by ih. @mptatnrnr for retuh oI ih. ahount .eceived by th. p.omoter on tattu.s or promot.r to compt€tc dr unable b 8iv. po$ess,on ot tte unit i. a.ordan e with th. t.ms of the a8reeh.nt for sale or duly conplet€d by the date sDe.tffcd thereiD.

The complahanlallottee has alr.ady wished b wtthd.aw t om the Drcl.d and th. alloree h.s b4ome €ntided his rtsht under se.tion 19(4) to ctaim the retund of amount paid alonS with inteBt .t pr*rih.d .are iioh rhe yor unable to sLve poseslon or ragEment to. sale Aaordinrly, promokr r5 the promoier fa the unit in a..ord,n.e wnh and oB tsupEt r*tkd orhervs u'l...r dird; 12.0s12022 r\risob$Ned ,t fic aqtdined nqht olth. ohd b 'tu.4uadretned utuet scnar 1eo)tu) qad scb le(1jal.n.adbnd pctutuary @ ne.r"* at sdNtdtia6 ilq@t h owR that rh. bobbture h6 @6tb6t! poqded dB tbhi dI .4ud dmtu as or iItu {aroir toih b ,tpdobd urdu the tnnsot6.qrm.rn4 tx dttrtd Gn *48 q 'b! td.B ol\. coudt.ibtnotdnhE ir ath*ffitnat ottib,bbh b k. db@/rnn. bryi, abrsouar to rcJhd d" onauton dqo u GURL]GNAM ldkrn rd.dn@ do$ rd *n b Nkhtttdw It@ dL ptet& h. *d r. arc.d tu 60.

The pbhot.r ts .€sponsible for aI oblUarions, resDomlbllldeg and tunctions under th. prcvisioN ot the Ad ot 2016 or the rul.s and rqutatio.s Dade theEututer or to the allonee .s per .3Er.nt lor sale u(ls s(don 1(41(al. rhe pDrot€r h.s tatled b dnpld. o. un.bre to glve po$ession of the ult h a.oda.e with the Errc of .8,tm.nt ro. sre or dL\ .omphFd by lir&lskbgdfied rh.Fin.

Ac@rdrn3ty. th.

Drcmoter x lEbl. b tfie anormr db@ wuh* to Mrhd'aw rrom ,l-. proi6 L qdDur ereltdG oA!{&h} edy.varl.ble. b return F "-",",,"*,'""'"xD;@{gx* .,*t"*,,,Mx: 1' * l" " *fl ARfr,f,Lft. or rozo* r,r,".",.

6n-nifiro B'FIMCLR] .ppllabte a( on ..,. a( on ..,. .,*,,.;.GiJrilJGliAM{,,;, -*,-* (Regulabon .rd Ddelopm.ntl Rul*, 2017 tron th€ dat€ ofech p.ym.nt dll the adual dab ot.etund ofthe amount wtthln the dn.l,n* pbvided in .ule 16 of the H.ryana Rules 2017 ibid.

11 Drrdio6 orth€ autno.ty HARERA 63.

Hence, the authoriry her.by pases this older a.d issuss the louoMng diredions trnder s4!on 37 of rhe Ad ro ensure comptia.ce of obtiga!ons THARERA Q GUI?UGRAI/ casrupon ihepronoteras perthefundron ehnu*ed to thdauthoriNLndcr i.

Therespondeht/promot€rudirrtedrorerundthed.nre jmounr p,id by the conplajnanr iin the tuo comptai.Bl atons wrh p.esoibed .ate of in terc$ @ 10.70% p.a. as p.es.ribed underrule 1s of ihe fiarya.a Rear Eshte tResxtation & Dev€topmen, {ures, 2017 mm th. d.b ot ea.h p,rm.nt ![ th. d.F ofEtund ofrht e responde.r to compty wrth the nE wh'ch legrl.onscquei.es