RAJBIR SINGH AND SARLA DEVI vs MAGIC EYE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Matter to come up on 25.11.2025 for further proceedings.

Matter is adjourned to 07.08.2025.

Matter is adjourned to 27.03.2025.

Matter is adjourned to 29.10.2024.

Matter is adjourned to 29.07.2024.

Advocates are abstaining from court work today. A request from District Bar Association, Gurugram has been received for suspension of today’s proceedings, due to sad demise of Sh. Praveen Rao Advocate.                            Adjourned to 21.03.2024 for same proceedings.

Adjudicating Officer is on leave. Adjourned to 19.01.2024 for further proceedings.

It is submitted by learned counsel for JD that matter is still pending before the Appellate Tribunal. Next date before the Tribunal is 29.08.2023.                           To come on 06.11.2023 for further proceedings.

It is submitted by learned counsel for JD that his client has already filed an appeal against decree under execution and the decretal amount has also been deposited before the Appellate Tribunal. Next date before the Tribunal is 12.07.2023.                          To come on 23.08.2023 for further proceedings.

It is submitted by learned counsel for JD that his client has already filed an appeal against decree under execution and the decretal amount has also been deposited before the Appellate Tribunal. Next date before the Tribunal is 28.04.2023.                          To come on 16.05.2023 for further proceedings.

It is submitted by learned counsel for JD that his client has already filed an appeal against decree under execution and the decretal amount has also been deposited before the Appellate Tribunal. Next date before the Tribunal is 16.12.2022.                         To come on 02.03.2023 for further proceedings.

It is submitted that matter is still pending before the Appellate Tribunal.                           To come for further proceedings on 12.12.2022.

It is pointed out by learned counsel for JD/respondent that her client has already filed an appeal against order under execution and the decretal amount has already been deposited there.                        learned counsel for DH requests to recover the decretal amount stating that there is no stay against execution of said order.                       When JD has already deposited decretal amount, there is no reason to direct JD to pay the decretal amount again. Request in this regard is declined. At the same time, learned counsel for respondent/JD filed objections. Copy given.                        To come on 28.09.2022 for further proceedings.