Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH PRACHI SINGH vs VATIKA LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-909-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing5 Feb 2026
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH PRACHI SINGH
Respondent
  • VATIKA LIMITED

Case Summary

HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH PRACHI SINGH filed Case No. RERA-GRG-909-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against VATIKA LIMITED. The case has undergone 28 hearings over 2 years and 10 months. The case is currently pending. 21 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (28)

  • 5FEB 2026
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: PENDING

  • 15JAN 2026
    Hearing

    Judge: ANU

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11DEC 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Sh. Shivaditya Mukherjee, Advocate and Ms. Minoti, AR are present on behalf of the promoter. The reply from DTCP, Haryana is still awaited. A reminder may be sent by the secretary within a period of one week. The matter to come up on 15.01.2026. The date has been noted by the counsel for the respondent promoter

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20NOV 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    MATTER ADJOURNED TO 11.12.2025

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30OCT 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Stage: PENDING

  • 18SEP 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Stage: PENDING

  • 8AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Counsel for promoters appeared and request for adjournment. Matter to come for further proceedings on 18.09.2024 at 11:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Counsel for promoters appeared and states that arguing counsel is not available today. Request for adjournment. Matter to come for further proceedings on 08.08.2024 at 11:00 P.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 19JUN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    PROXY ADVOCATE SHUBHAM MANN ON BEHALF OF SH. VENKET RAO (ADVOCATE) AND SH. NITISH BANSAL (AR) APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE PROMOTER AND REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING AS THERE IS A DEMISE IN THE FAMILY OF MAIN COUNSEL. ALSO, IT WAS INADVERTENTLY MENTIONED IN PROCEEDING DATED 15-05-2024 THAT THEY HAVE FILED THE REPLY WHEREAS NO REPLY HAS BEEN RECEIVED IN THE AUTHORITY. THEY ARE DIRECTED TO FILE THE REPLY ON OR BEFORE NEXT DATE OF HEARING. MATTER TO COME UP ON 19-06-2024 AT 10:30 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 5JUN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Proxy Advocate Shubham Mann on behalf of Sh. Venket Rao (Advocate) and Sh. Nitish Bansal (AR) appeared on behalf of the promoter and request for adjournment of hearing as there is a demise in the family of main counsel. Also, it was inadvertently mentioned in proceeding dated 15-05-2024 that they have filed the reply whereas no reply has been received in the authority. They are directed to file the reply on or before next date of hearing. Matter to come up on 19-06-2024 at 10:30 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 15MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Proxy Advocate Shubham Mann on behalf of Sh. Venket Rao (Advocate) appeared on behalf of the promoter. The counsel states that they had filed the reply today itself which needs to be examined by the authority. Matter to come up on 05-06-2024 at 10:30 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Advocate Simran Goel (Proxy counsel) on behalf of Sh. Venket Rao (Advocate) appeared on behalf of the promoter and request for short adjournment to submit the reply. Matter to come up on 15-05-2024 at 10:30 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Sh. Venket Rao (Advocate) and Ms. Minoti Kumari (Senior Manager)appeared on behalf of the promoter. The promoter was directed to submit the proof of change of developer permission regarding which the AR and counsel of the promoter states that they had applied for COD permission in DTCP, Haryana on 17-12-2019 and renewal of license no. 122 of 2008 is applied on 11-12-2023 which is likely to be renewed shortly. Therefore, they request for adjournment of two weeks. Matter to come up on 02-05-2024 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20MAR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Sh. Virender Dhar (Vice President), Sh. Jitendra Kumar (Senior Manager), Sh. Rahul Johari (Manager) and Simran Goel (Proxy Advocate) appeared on behalf of the promoter. The AR of the promoter states that they are pursuing for renewal of license with DTCP, Haryana. However, they have submitted the required BG for the same. Further he request for three weeks time to submit the renewal of license and thereafter 15 days time more for applying for registration and further added that they have applied for part OC and proof of the same shall be filed along with the reply. Also, they had applied for registration of project in year 2017 in interim HARERA, Panchkula and the same was rejected because of non-renewal of license. Proof of application filed for registration of project shall be filed along with the reply before next date of hearing. Matter to come up on 10-04-2024 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Pankaj Chandola (Advocate) and Mayank Grover appeared on behalf of the promoter and request for some time to submit the compliance report of the proceeding dated 31-01-2024. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 20-03-2024 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 31JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Venket Rao (Advocate) and Minoti Kumari  appeared on behalf of the promoter. Counsel for the promoter states that they have applied for renewal of license and proof of the same has been submitted in the authority on 16-01-2024 and further states that after renewal of license, they shall apply for registration of project. Matter to come up on 29-02-2024 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 17JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    DUE TO PUBLIC HOLIDAY ON 17-01-2024, MATTER ADJOURNED TO 31-01-2024 AT 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6DEC 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Pankaj Chandola (Advocate) appeared on behalf of the promoter and request for adjournment. The matter adjourns to 18-01-2024 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 23NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Pankaj Chandola (Advocate) appeared on behalf of the promoter. The counsel for the promoter requested for adjournment of hearing as the main counsel could not be able to attend the hearing due to personal urgency. Matter adjourned to 06-12-2023 at 02:00 P.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    None appeared on behalf of the promoter. Matter to come up on 23-11-2023 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 19OCT 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Sh. Umashankar (Consultant-legal), Sh. Jitendra Kumar (Sr. Manager) and Sh. Rahul Johari (Manager) appeared on behalf of the promoter.   The counsel for the promoter requested for adjournment.  Final adjournment is granted to the promoter and no further request shall be accepted. Matter to come up on 02-11-2023 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 4OCT 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Proxy Adv. Pankaj Chandola is appeared on behalf of the promoter. Proxy counsel for the promote has requested for adjournment of hearing as the mother of concerned official got expired. Matter to come up on 19-10-2023 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20SEP 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Proxy Adv. Vikas and Sh. Jitender Kumar (Senior Manager) are appeared on behalf of the promoter. Proxy counsel has filed the MoA and Vakalatnama will be filed on next date of hearing. He stated that the main counsel Sh. Venket Rao is engaged at NCRDC, New Delhi today. Hence, they seek an adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 04-10-2023 at 11:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 31AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Proxy Adv. Mayank Grover, Sh. Uma Shankar (Consultant-legal) and Sh. Jitender Kumar (Senior Manager) are appeared on behalf of the promoter. The legal consultant of the company has submitted an application for adjournment of hearing as the main counsel of the promoter is not available today due to matters listed before other court in Delhi. Also, the promoter has filed the reply on 28-08-2023 stating that license no. 122 of 2008 was issued by DTCP, Haryana for an area admeasuring 10.718 acres for the development of commercial colony. All the approvals bearing license no. 122 of 2008 was issued in the name of M/s Trishul Industries. On 30-06-2006, M/s Trishul Industries was converted into a M/s Trishul Prop Build Ltd and DTCP, Haryana has granted in principle approval for transfer of license in the name of M/s Trishul Prop Build Ltd on 01-04-2013. Thereafter, M/s Trishul Prop Build Ltd went into winding up and Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court appointed official liquidator against the licensee company. Vide order dated 18-01-2019, Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court had allowed for winding up of M/s Trishul Prop Build Ltd and the assets of M/s Trishul Prop Build Ltd was subjected to be transferred to Vatika Ltd in terms of the approved “Scheme for Transfer of Assets”. On 27-12-2019, M/s Vatika Ltd has applied to DTCP for transfer of license in their name which has not been obtained till date. Also, a letter dated 22-07-2020 vide memo no. 3223 was issued by DTCP, Haryana to M/s Vatika Ltd to submit the revalidated bank guarantee which had expired on 24-08-2020 and after which no compliances have been done by the promoter. Therefore, the promoter is directed to obtain the COD permission from the competent authority and make an application for registration of the project in the authority and further the authority restrains the promoter from creating any third-party rights on the said project till further orders and to supply a details of sold and unsold inventory of the whole project. Matter to come up on 20-09-2023 at 11:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    None appeared on behalf of the promoter. With reference to Suo Motu (Projects) no. RERA-GRG-909-2023, the promoter was directed to do the compliance of aforesaid show cause notice along with an opportunity of hearing. It has been noticed that there was no authorized person on behalf of the company to appear before the authority for personal hearing. Therefore, one final opportunity of hearing is given to the promoter to submit the detailed reply and appear before the authority for hearing on 31-08-2023 at 11:00 A.M. otherwise authority shall be bound to proceed Ex-parte.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 19APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 10-08-2023 AT 11:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 5APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 19.04.2023

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20MAR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The matter is adjourned to 05.04.2023

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (21)