PRATEEK SRIVASTAVA AND NAMITA MEHTA vs VATIKA LIMITED

Matter is adjourned to 20.11.2025.

Due to administrative exigencies, the execution petition is adjourned to 06.02.2026 for the purpose as already fixed.

Matter to come up on 28.10.2025 for further proceedings.

Matter is adjourned to 11.08.2025.

Matter is adjourned to 03.04.2025.

Fresh calculation is given by learned counsel for DH. According him, total amounting Rs. 3,71,924.7/-is still payable by the JD. Proxy counsel for JD requests for short adjournment stating that main counsel could not come today, as advocates are abstaining from work. Allowed.                         To come on 05.03.2025 for further proceedings.

Matter is adjourned to 28.02.2025.

Matter is adjourned to 30.10.2024.

Matter is adjourned to 30.10.2024.

Matter is adjourned to 04.10.2024.

Matter is adjourned to 30.09.2024.

Matter is adjourned to 19.09.2024.

Matter is adjourned to 13.09.2024.

Matter is adjourned to 08.08.2024.

Matter is adjourned to 29.04.2024.

RE-OPENED

MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 19.10.2023.

Matter is adjourned to 19.09.2023.

It is submitted by learned counsel for JD that matter is still pending before the Appellate Tribunal. Next date before the Tribunal is 10.08.2023.                           To come on 01.09.2023 for further proceedings.

Advocates are abstaining from court work today. A request from District Bar Association, Gurugram has been received for suspension of today’s proceedings.                            Adjourned to 07.07.2023 for further proceedings.

Today was for consideration on an application filed by JD with request to prepone the date. Proxy counsel for applicant/JD requests for adjournment stating that main counsel could not come today.                            To come on 28.04.2023 i.e. date already fixed.

None for the applicant. To come at 2.00 p.m., today. 2.15 p.m                             Case is called again at 2.15 p.m. None appeared on behalf of applicant/JD. This is application with request to prepone the date.  None appeared for applicant/JD, despite several calls. Application is thus dismissed in default.                              To come on 28.04.2023 i.e date already fixed.

File put up today, on an application filed on behalf of JD. At the outset, it is pointed by learned counsel for non-applicant/DH that this application has been filed through Ms Ankur Berry Adv, and Mr Yashvir Balhara, who have no power of attorney on behalf of applicant/JD.                           Admittedly, learned counsel have no authority on behalf of applicant/JD to file this application.                          Application is thus dismissed.

It is submitted by learned counsel for JD that appeal filed by his client against an order passed by this forum directing the bank managers HDFC bank to release the amount in favour of DH has been stayed by the Appellate Tribunal. Said case is fixed for 18.04.2023, before the Tribunal.                            At the same time, learned counsel requests to send recovery certificate stating that in view of order passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Chandigarh, in case tilted as M/s International Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Aditi Chauhan and others CWP No. 7738 of 2022, and M/s International Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nitin Mathur and others CWP 7750 of 2022 for recovery of amount, in execution recovery certificate is required to be issued to the collector concerned.                        On the other hand, learned counsel for DH insists for direction to the bank managers not to allow withdrawal of any amount of that account till that  appeal is decided by the Appellate Tribunal.                        Even as per learned counsel for JD, the Appellate Tribunal has directed that the amount be not disbursed in favour of DH. There is nothing that JD will be free to withdraw that amount.                       Considering all this, requests of learned counsel for DH is allowed to the extent that manager of said bank be directed not to allow withdrawal of any amount, even by the JD leaving balance less than decretal amount of Rs. 34,20,337/-. Let a copy of this order be sent to manager of said bank for compliance.                       To come on 28.04.2023 for further proceedings.

MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 01.02.2023.

Advocates  are abstaining  from court work. A request from District Bar Association, Gurugram has been received for suspension of today’s proceedings.                          To come  23.11.2022 for proceedings already fixed.

Learned counsel for DH requests to attach the bank account of JD detailed as under: 1.     Bank Account No.02802320000042, HDFC Bank Ltd First India Place, Mehrauli Gurugram Road, Gurugram-122002 2.     Bank Account No.5720350000172, HDFC Bank Ltd  Vatika Atrium, Block A, Khasra No.1741/1742/1743, village Wazirabad, Sector-53, Guruguram-122002.                                              JD admits that no appeal has been filed against decree under execution and there is no stay against it.  No objections are filed. Considering all this, request is allowed. Let  bank account(s) of JD mentioned above are attached to the extent of decretal amount. Managers of said bank are directed not to allow withdrawal of any amount to the extend to decretal amount from said account(s) till further order. Same be also asked to give report about balance in that  account(s) till next date.                 To come on 19.10.2022  for further  proceedings.