NEERAJ RANA vs ALM INFOTECH CITY PVT.LTD.

Hearing History (9)

• 9APR 2025
  Hearing

  Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

  Matter is disposed of.

  Stage: DISPOSED

• 22JAN 2025
  Hearing

  Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

  Matter is adjourned to 09.04.2025 for the purpose as already fixed.

  Stage: PENDING

• 13NOV 2024
  Hearing

  Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

  The parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and a copy of settlement  agreement dated 22.09.2024  to this effect has been placed on record by the counsel for the respondent which is duly signed by both the parties.  However,  the counsel for the complainant states that the settlement agreement has been signed under duress. Therefore,  no cognizance may be taken of the same.   The counsel for the complainant is directed to come present with the complainant on the next date of hearing to clarify the issue.   Matter to come up on 22.01.2025  for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 4SEP 2024
  Hearing

  Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

  The counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment to argue the matter. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 13.11.2024 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 10JUL 2024
  Hearing

  Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

  The present complaint was filed on 30.12.2022 and registered as complaint no. 7868 of 2022. On the last date of hearing, the defence of the respondent was struck off. Succinct facts as per the complaint are as follows:- Sr. No. Particulars Details 1. Name of the project “IId Grand”, Section-37-C, Gurguram, Haryana. 2. Project Area 5.679 acres 3. Nature of project  Residential Group Housing Colony 4. DTCP license no. 1.      License No. 96/2010 dated 03.11.2010 2.      License No. 118/2011 dated 26.12.2011. 5. RERA registered Registered 386 of 2017 Dated-18.12.2017. 6. Allotment letter 12.08.2016 (As on page no. 11 of complaint)                            7. Unit no. 9-C, Tower-B2, Tower name-Vision, Wing No-C, Floor-9th. (As on page no. 11 of complaint) 8. Unit area 1790 sq.ft. (As on page no. 11 of complaint) 9. Date of execution of buyer’s agreement dated  12.08.2016 (As on page no. 14 of complaint) 10. Possession clause Clause-9 COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND COMPENSATION FOR DELAY. (I)                Subject to Force Majeure circumstances as defined herein and subject to timely grant of all approvals, permissions, NOCs, etc and further subject to the Allottee(s) having complied with all his obligations under the terms and consitions of this Agreement and the Allottee(s)( not being in default under any part of this Agreement including but not limited to the timely payment of the total sale Consideration and other Charges/fees/taxes/levies and also subject to the Allottee(s) having complied with all formalities or documentation as prescribed by the Developer, the Developer proposes to complete the construction within a period of 24 months computed from the date of execution of this agreement with further grace period of 180 days under normal circumstances. [Emphasis supplied] (As on page no.  27 of complaint) 11. Due date of possession  12.12.2018 [Calculated 24 months + 180 days] 12. Total consideration Rs. 86,42,120/- (As on page no. 18 of complaint) 13. Total amount paid by the                         complainant Rs.55,53,017/- (As per S.O.A on page no. 47 of complaint) 14. Occupation certificate Not obtained 15. Offer of possession Not offered   The proxy counsel for the respondent requests for an adjournment as the  marriage of the arguing counsel  is fixed for 14.07.2024.  Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 04.09.2024 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 3APR 2024
  Hearing

  Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

  The present complaint was filed on 30.12.2022 and registered as complaint no. 7868 of 2022. On the last date of hearing, the defence of the respondent was struck off. The counsel for the complainant seeks a short adjournment to enable the respondent to obtain OC. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 10.07.2024 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 3JAN 2024
  Hearing

  Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

  The  present complaint has been received on 30.12.2022 and the reply on behalf of the respondent has not been received till date. The defense of the respondent was struck off on 17.10.2023. The counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment  as the respondent is offering the possession by end of January 2024. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 03.04.2024 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 17OCT 2023
  Hearing

  Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

  The present complaint was filed on 30.12.2023 and registered as complaint No. 7868 of 2022. On the last date of hearing i.e 23.05.2023, the respondent was directed to file the reply in the registry of the authority within two weeks i.e. 06.06.2023 with an advance copy to the complainant failing which cost of Rs.5000/- would be imposed. Today neither the reply has been submitted nor the respondent has appeared In view of the above, defence of the respondent is struck off. Matter to come up on 03.01.2024 for further proceedings.

  Stage: PENDING

• 23MAY 2023
  Hearing

  Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

  The present complaint was filed on 30.12.2022 and registered as complaint No. 7868 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file.  Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected], [email protected] & [email protected] and the same are shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.   No written reply has been filed by the respondent till date. Shri Rishabh Gupta Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent and filed power of attorney and requests for 2 weeks time to file reply. The respondent is directed to file reply in the registry of the authority within two weeks i.e., by 06.06.2023 with an advance copy to the complainant failing which cost of Rs,5000/- shall  be imposed upon the respondent.  In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent may be  struck off.   Matter to come up on 17.10.2023  for further proceedings.

  Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (10)

• 9APR 2025
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 9APR 2025
  judgement

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 22JAN 2025
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 13NOV 2024
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 4SEP 2024
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 10JUL 2024
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 3APR 2024
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 3JAN 2024
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 17OCT 2023
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗
• 23MAY 2023
  order

  Order No: N/A

  View Order ↗

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗