Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

RAMAN AGGARWAL AND SONS HUF vs KASHISH DEVELOPERS LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-2305-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing12 Dec 2025
Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • RAMAN AGGARWAL AND SONS HUF
Respondent
  • KASHISH DEVELOPERS LIMITED

Case Summary

RAMAN AGGARWAL AND SONS HUF filed Case No. RERA-GRG-2305-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against KASHISH DEVELOPERS LIMITED. The case has undergone 14 hearings over 3 years and 4 months. The case is currently pending. 14 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (14)

  • 12DEC 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Matter stands disposed of. Detailed order will follow.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 14NOV 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Matter to come up on 12.12.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10JAN 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 8NOV 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    The present complaint was filed on 07.06.2022 and the respondent was filed on 01.12.2023. None present on behalf of the complainant.  One more and last opportunity is being granted to the complainant to appear on the next date of hearing to argue the matter. Matter to come up on 10.1.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 16AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 07.06.2022 and the respondent was filed on 01.12.2023. The  proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the  main arguing counsel is not available today. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 08.11.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 07.06.2022 and the respondent was filed on 01.12.2023. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant. One last and final opportunity is granted to the complainant to appear and to pursue the matter. Matter to come up  on 16.08.2024  for further proceeding.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 07.06.2022 and the respondent was filed on 01.12.2023. The counsel for the complainant states that complete copy of reply has not received by the complainant.  Respondent to send the complete copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant enable her to file the rejoinder. Matter to come up on 12.7.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 23FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The counsel for the complainant states that they have received the copy of reply but without annexures. Further stated that the copy of reply supplied to the complainant not legible also and requests for fresh copy of the reply. The counsel for the respondent is directed to deliver one more legible copy of the reply complete in all respect  to the counsel for the complainant within two weeks. Matter to come up on 12.4.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    On the last date of hearing  i.e.6.2.2023 the respondent was directed to file reply within two weeks by 11.8.2023 with  cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainant.  On previous date i.e. on 28.7.2023, the counsel for the respondent seeks short adjournment to file reply within two weeks but the respondent failed  to file reply in the  stipulated time period. An application dated 9.11.2023 has been filed by the counsel for the respondent that she will not be  in a position to attend the hearing on 10.11.2023 as the severe pollution levels in Delhi was taking a toll on her health and she has moved out of station for few days. Respondent  is given one last opportunity to file reply within two weeks alongwith an additional cost of Rs,.5000/- to be paid to the complainant failing which the defence shall be struck off. It is the last opportunity. Matter to come up on 23.2.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The  present complaint was filed on 07.06.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent was not filed by the respondent till date. On the last date of hearing counsel for the respondent appeared and was directed to file reply in the registry with a cost of Rs. 5000/-within 2 weeks failing which its defence shall be struck off. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant. Ms Priyanka Agarwal Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent today and filed memo of appearance and requests for a short adjournment.The respondent is directed to file reply alongwith previous costs within 2 weeks with an advance copy to the complainant. It shall be the last opportunity. If the reply is not filed within the stipulated period, the defence of the respondent shall be struck off. Matter to come up  on 10.11.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6FEB 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 07.06.2022 and registered as complaint No. 2305/2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed. It is nor proper service of the notice.            Shri Jagdeep Yadav proxy counsel has appeared on behalf of the respondent today and  requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply. The respondent is directed to file reply in the registry of the authority within two weeks with an advance copy to the complainant subject to payment of Rs.5000/- to be paid to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent shall struck off.  Matter to come up on 28.07.2023  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3FEB 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    In view of farewell function  and programme  in the honour of Hon’ble Chairman on his retirement,  the matter is adjourned to 06.02.2023 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10OCT 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Matter is adjourned to 03.02.2023.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26JUL 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Coram not complete. Matter is adjourned to 10.10.2022  for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (14)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

HARYANA REAL ESTATE REGTJLAIORY AUTHORITY GURUGRAM *@* GURUGRAM eRqrsn T-Tic(r frftqrq-s. qrFftor, Wrrq HARERA PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY 1 Day and Date Friday and 10.01.2025 Complaint No.

CR/2305/2022 Case titled as Ram Agarwal VS KASHISH DEVELoPE LIMITED Complainant Raman Agarwal Represented through None Respondent KASHISH DEVELOPERS LIMIl'EI) Respondent Represented Shri 0m Parkash Singh Advocate Last date ofhearing 08.7L.2024 Proceeding Recorded by Naresh Kumari and HR Mehta Proceedings-cum-order Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of tl complainant today.

As per record available on file, it is observed that tl Authority has given ample opportunities to the complainant vide orde dated L2.07.2024, L6.08.2024 and 08.11.2024 to pur in appearance and pursue the said matter before the Authority.

However, the complainant h repeatedly failed to put in appearance before the Authority. lt is alrea( 12.40 PM and no further wait is iustified.

It appears that the complainant not interested in pursuing his case.

Hence the present complaint is dismissr in default for non-appearance of the complainant.

File be consigned to tl registry. '*- w Arun Kumar Chairman 10.01.2025 it L 6 l an RS the thc ers Ito has rdy tis sed the An Authority constituled under section 20 the Real Esrare (R€eularion dd Developmenr) Acr, 20 l6 {-ris4 {Rfi{,Ii }t{ Er{) xfrfic{, mt6fi r[ 20} rfrd {tun ctft--or

Similar Cases

⚖️
SMT RAJ BALA KADIAN vs AMD ESTATES PVT. LTD.
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING
⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs PRIYADARSHI KUMAR
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2019PENDING
⚖️
RAJIV KUMAR CHAUHAN vs MS BPTP LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2021PENDING
⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs AKSHITA SHARMA
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2019PENDING
⚖️
SANJAY KUMAR vs GEO CONNECT LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING