Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

SHALINI MEHRA AND AJAY MEHRA vs KASHISH DEVELOPERS LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-3989-2021
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing14 Nov 2025
Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • SHALINI MEHRA AND AJAY MEHRA
Respondent
  • KASHISH DEVELOPERS LIMITED

Case Summary

SHALINI MEHRA AND AJAY MEHRA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-3989-2021 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against KASHISH DEVELOPERS LIMITED. The case has undergone 22 hearings over 4 years. The case is currently pending. 24 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (22)

  • 14NOV 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Matter is disposed of.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 7NOV 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Due to administrative exigencies, the matter is adjourned to 14.11.2025 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10OCT 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Matter to come up on 07.11.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12SEP 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Matter to come up on 10.10.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2MAY 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 7FEB 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    The present complaint was filed on 30.09.2021 and the reply on behalf of the respondent was filed on 02.11.2021. The present matter was dismissed in default vide proceedings- cum- order dated 09.08.2024 due to non-appearance of complainant and was restored vide proceeding dated 11.10.2024. The counsel for the complainant appearing on behalf of the complainant files fresh vakalatnama and requests for a short adjournment to argue the matter. Request allowed. Matter to come up on 02.05.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11OCT 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    The aforesaid complaint was disposed of vide proceedings-cum-order dated 09.08.2024 by the authority  and was dismissed in default as  none appeared on behalf of the complainant. An application dated 23.08.2024 was filed by the complainant for restoration of proceedings-cum-order dated 09.08.2024 on the following grounds  that settlement talks were going on between the parties and during this period the complainant unfortunately fell seriously ill and was unable to personally attend before this Authority on last two dates of hearings as he is residing out of city in Delhi and the  non-appearance was neither intentional nor deliberate. Thus, in view of these facts the present complaint is hereby restored.    Matter to come up on 07.02.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 9AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 12JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant.  One last and final opportunity is granted to the complainant to appear and to argue the matter. Matter to come up  on 09.08.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 19APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 30.09.2021 and the reply on behalf of the respondent was filed on 02.11.2021.   Shri  Om Parkash Singh  Advocate has appeared on  behalf of the respondent today and filed power of attorney and requests for a short adjournment as he has been engaged recently.  Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 12.07.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 9FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The complainant present in person states that no settlement talks are going on and the matter may be decided on merits on the basis of documents available on the record. The proxy counsel for the respondent states that  the amended relief application alongwith relevant form  was received  on 29.09.2023  and the respondent has no objection to the same. The proxy counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment as the main counsel is not available today to argue the matter. One final and last opportunity is being to the respondent to argue the matter. Matter to come up on 19.04.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 8DEC 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The counsel for the respondent states that settlement talks are going on between the parties and hence requests for a short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 09.02.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29SEP 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The counsel for the complainant states that the complainant has moved an application for amendment of relief on 27.09.2023 after sending the copy of the same through mail to the respondent. However,  AR of the company as well as counsel state that they have not received the copy of the said application.  The counsel for the complainant has handed over a copy of the said application to the counsel for the respondent during  the proceedings. The counsel for the respondent seeks a short adjournment for filing reply to the aforesaid application. Request is allowed. They are directed to file the reply to the said application within a period of 2 weeks with an advance copy to the complainant, if they wish to do so. Matter to come up on 08.12.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent, hence the defence of the respondent is struck off. The present complaint was filed on 30.09.2021 and the reply on behalf of the respondent was filed on 02.11.2021.   Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and annexures are as under: S. N. Particulars Details 1.       Name and location of the project “Manor One” situated at Sector-111 Gurgaon. 2.       Nature of the project Group Housing Colony 3.       Project area 14.843 acres 4.       DTCP license no. and validity status 110 of 2011 dated 16.12.2011 valid upto 13.12.2019 5.       Name of licensee M/s Vinman Construction Pvt. Ltd. and 4 others 6.       Rera registered or not Registered Vide 58 of 2019 dated 24.09.2019 Valid Upto 31.12.2021 7.       Allotment Letter 02.01.2013 (page no. 21 of complaint) 8.       Date of apartment buyers’ agreement  08.01.2014 (page no. 23 of complaint) 9.       Unit No.  A-5H, 5th Floor, Tower A (page no. 27 of complaint) 10.                          Unit area admeasuring 895 sq. ft. (page no. 27 of complaint) 11.                          Due date of possession 08.07.2014 (Calculated from the date of agreement) Note: Grace period is allowed being unqualified. 12.                          Possession clause 3(a) Possession That subject to terms of this clause and subject to the apartment allottee having complied with all the terms and conditions of this agreement and not being in default under any of the provision of this agreement and further subject to compliance with all the provisions, formalities, registration of sale deed, documentation, payment of all amount due and payable to the developers by the apartment allottee(s) under this agreement, as prescribed by the Developer, the Developer proposes to hand over the possession of said apartment within a period of thirty (36) months (excluding a grace period of 6 months) from the date of execution of this agreement. It is however understood between the parties that the possession of various Block/Towers comprised in the complex and also the various common facilities planned therein shall be ready and completed in phases wise and will be handed over to the allottees of different Blocks/Tower as and when the same will be completed and in a phased manner. 13.                          Total sale consideration Rs. 72,68,950/- (as per payment schedule on page no. 62 of compliant) 14.                          Amount paid by the complainant Rs. 42,50,000/- (as alleged by complainant) 15.                          Completion certificate Not obtained 16.                          Offer of possession Not offered   The counsel for the complainant states that although the complainant has  filed a complaint for taking refund  but still the complainant is ready to take the possession after paying the balance dues alongwith interest as per RERA norms.  The complainant is accordingly advised to amend the relief in the complaint and submit a copy of the same to the counsel for the respondent. Matter to come up on 29.09.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24MAR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent. The counsel for the complainant states that they have booked a unit in the above project and the due date of possession was 07.01.2017 and further states that the complainant had  paid an amount of Rs.28 Lakhs through online transaction. Since the respondent is not present today,  the matter needs some clarification and is being adjourned for a short  while. Matter to come up on 26.05.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 23DEC 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Proceedings were adjourned due to administrative reasons.  Therefore,  no hearings. Adjourned to 24.03.2023   for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10OCT 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The  present complaint has been received from the adjudicating officer on the judgement dated 11.11.2021 in the title - M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd.  VS State of UP and Ors. Etc. The present complaint has been received on 30.09.2021 and the reply on behalf of respondent is received on 02.11.2021. Case has been called out but none is present on behalf of the complainant.  The counsel for the respondent moved an application for adjournment of the case on the ground that they are settling the matter with the complainant. Matter to come up on 23.12.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26JUL 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Coram not complete. Matter is adjourned to 10.10.2022  for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26MAY 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    On account of administrative exigencies, matter is adjourned to 26.07.2022  for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 4MAY 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Due to paucity of time, matter could not be heard.                Matter to come up  on 26.5.2022 for the purpose already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6APR 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

    In view  of judgment dated 11.11.2021 in title- M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of UP & Ors. Etc. passed by the  Apex Court, this forum has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the complaint in hands.                              File be transferred to the Authority. Next date will be notified later on by the Authority. Reader is directed to send the file immediately.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2NOV 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

    Written reply filed. Copy given.                             To come on 06.04.2022 for arguments.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (24)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY Day and Date Friday and 09.0A.2024 Complaint No.

CR/3989 /2021, Case MEHRA AND AIAY M DEVELOPERS LIM I1'EI) Complainant SHALINI MEHRA AND Represented through Respondent KASHISH DEVEI-OPERS Respondent Represented Shri Om Parkash Advo Last date of hearing Proceeding Recorded by ffi HARERA #t eunuennll New PWD Rest Hoose, Civit Lines, Guru HARYANA REAI.

ESIAIE REGUI.AT GURUGRAM Eftfi"fi a_qr<r Fdtr"rrrr Y AUTHORIIY d.

A{q tl'].rrq as SIIAL VS KASHI tlcd +4 i l INI i SH l l proceedings_cum_order On the last date of hearing, case has been called out but no on behalf of the complainant.

One last and final opportun the complainant to appear and to argue the matter The present complaint was filed on 30.09.2021 and the rep respondent was filed on 02.1.7.2021 Today none appeared on behalf of the complainant, h complaint is dismissed in default.

File be consigned to the re RA AY MEHRA LIMITED 1,2.07.2024 Naresh Kumari and HR ehta ne had appeared was granted to on behalf of the nce the present stry.

Jee Kum cmber .08,2024 An Aurhoflt\ . onsr.rured-ura. .v1m .zO ne c..t rs,q 1e"A, rur,on -nd 6e,.r r-{iusl (Eticrr rftr h'r'rs, qtufiqr 2o16d rm:o+ ld,rd;ifi; Ei;

Similar Cases

⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs RAJDEEP KAUR BAMRAH
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2019PENDING
⚖️
SMT RAJ BALA KADIAN vs AMD ESTATES PVT. LTD.
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING
⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs PRIYADARSHI KUMAR
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2019PENDING
⚖️
RAJIV KUMAR CHAUHAN vs MS BPTP LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2021PENDING
⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs AKSHITA SHARMA
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2019PENDING