Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

NIHARIKA BAJPAI vs TULSIANI CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-989-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing10 Oct 2024
Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • NIHARIKA BAJPAI
Respondent
  • TULSIANI CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.

Case Summary

NIHARIKA BAJPAI filed Case No. RERA-GRG-989-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against TULSIANI CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.. The case has undergone 7 hearings over 1 year and 1 month. The case is currently pending. 9 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (7)

  • 10OCT 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The complainant filed an application on 20.08.2024 for restoration of present complaint. The complainant submits that the complaint remained unheard on last date of hearing and the counsel for respondent by taking the undue advantage didn’t bother to ask the court for some time but sought direction from the court to dismiss the same. The counsel of respondent states that refund amount has been adjusted on the request of complainant and no dues certificate is signed dated 11.01.2021 and the disbursal by the concerned allottee in whose favor the amount had been adjusted is an internal matter between two parties and cannot be adjudicated by this authority. Arguments heard. Application stands rejected being devoid of merits. File be consigned to registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 8AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 25APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Due to paucity of time, the matter could not  be heard today. Matter to come upon 08.8.2024 for further proceedints.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 15FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Reply of applications for recall of order dated 09.11.2023 and for maintainability of the complaint not filed on behalf of complainant. Learned appearing counsel for complainant submitted that no reply of said applications is to be filed so case may be listed before the authority for arguments. Accordingly, now the case is listed before the authority on 25.04.2024 for consideration of applications for recall of order dated 09.11.2023 and for maintainability of the complaint.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 25JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Today case is fixed for arguments. At this stage application for recall of order dated 09.11.2023 and application for maintainability of complaint filed on behalf of respondent in the registry and taken on record. Copy of same supplied to ld. Counsel for complaint. Now come upon for 15.02.2024 for filing reply of both applications.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 9NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 09.03.2023 and registered as complaint No. 989 of 2023. Written reply has not been filed by the respondent so far despite a period of  8 months. In view of the above, there is no justification to allow any further time to file reply. The defence of the respondent is struck off.  Matter to come up on 25.01.2024 for arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter is adjourned to 09.11.2023.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (9)

Similar Cases

⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs RAJDEEP KAUR BAMRAH
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)H-REAT2019PENDING
⚖️
ANIL SHARMA vs GEO CONNECT LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)RERA-PKL2023PENDING
⚖️
VIVEK SINGH CHAUHAN vs RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)RERA-PKL2023PENDING
⚖️
AYESHA JAGGI AND ANJALI JAGGI vs PAREENA INFRASTUCTURE PVT LTD
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)H-REAT2024PENDING
⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs RITU SAREEN
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)H-REAT2019PENDING