Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

MR MANISH BHATIA vs BRAHMA CITY PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-3840-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing27 May 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MR MANISH BHATIA
Respondent
  • BRAHMA CITY PVT LTD

Case Summary

MR MANISH BHATIA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-3840-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against BRAHMA CITY PVT LTD. The case has undergone 11 hearings over 1 year and 6 months. The case is currently pending. 11 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (11)

  • 27MAY 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter is disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 4MAR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 24DEC 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint has been filed on 21.08.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 23.01.2024. The complainant, who is a subsequent allottee seeking quashing of cancellation of the plot, DPC and execution of the conveyance deed. The offer of possession dated 30.03.2022 is being challenged by the complainant on the ground that the basis infrastructure of the project is yet to be completed and the demand of Rs. 46,51,580/- inclusive of IFMS and possession charges and Rs.69,333/- as one-year advance maintenance charges are invalid. Further, the respondent(s) have violated the provisions of Section 3(1) of the Act, 2016. On the other hand, the counsel for respondent(s) state that cancellation of the plot in question is valid as the complainant failed to deposit the outstanding amount despite many opportunities. The offer of possession was made to the complainant on 30.03.2022 well before the due date as per agreement to sell dated 31.05.2021. Counsel for respondent No.1 states that respondent No.1 is no more concerned with the project and no relief lies against respondent No.1.   Arguments heard. Order reserved. Both the counsels for the parties may file brief written submissions within a period of 3 weeks with an advance copy to each other.   Matter to come up on 04.03.2025 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 19NOV 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint has been filed on 21.08.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 23.01.2024. The counsel for the respondent states that settlement talks are going on between the parties to settle the matter amicably and request for an adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 24.12.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24SEP 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint has been filed on 21.08.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 23.01.2024. The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment as the arguing counsel is not available today. Request is allowed. No further adjournment shall be granted. Matter to come up on 24.09.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the main arguing counsel is not available today. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 06.08.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Reply filed by the respondent Adani Brahma Synergy Pvt. Ltd. in the registry today i.e. on 06.02.2022 taken on record. Cost of Rs. 5000/- paid through DD No. 068510 dated 30.01.2024 IndusInd Bank. Copy of reply also supplied today to the ld. Counsel of the complainant. As pleadings complete so case is listed before the authority on 30.04.2024 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Reply along with cost of Rs. 5000/- not filed on behalf of respondent Adani Brahma Synergy Pvt Ltd. Short adjournment requested. Reply filed by respondent Brahma City Private Limited in the registry on 23.01.2024 taken on record. Now the case is adjourned for 06.02.2024 for filing reply on behalf of respondent Adani Brahma Synergy Pvt Ltd. subject to previous cost of Rs. 5000/- failing which defence of respondent Adani Brahma Synergy Pvt Ltd. shall be struck off.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 23JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Reply not filed on behalf of both respondents within the stipulated period given in the order dated 23.11.2023. Cost of Rs. 5000/- paid today by respondent no. 2 through Demand draft no. 068490 dated 18.01.2024 IndusInd Bank to the ld. Counsel for complainant. Ld. Counsel for respondents requested for short adjournment for filing reply. Heard. Now the complaint is adjourned for 30.01.2024 for filing reply on behalf of respondent no. 1 along with previous cost of Rs. 5000/- and for filing reply on behalf of respondent no. 2 subject to the last opportunity.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 23NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 21.08.2023 and registered as complaint no. 3840 of 2023. Shri Harshit Batra Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent No.2 and filed memo of appearance today. Written reply has not been filed by the respondents so far. The counsel for the respondents requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply. Respondents are directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 07.12.2023 in the registry of the authority failing cost of Rs.5,000/- shall be imposed. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent shall be struck off.   Matter be put up before the full bench on 23.01.2024  for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (11)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

{THARERA -db* eunLrcnnv HAiYANA tEAt ISTAIE REOUIATOIY AUIHOIIW Eftqr"n A €qEr ftf{qFro qrfurrEr. rl1'rl{ t.*pwoi.( tso*.,ctrr !in,6-qpn,H.ry-r ?,t.sq.$ 6s,,r,F&. ft [@.inM PROCEEDINGS OF THI DAY 1:ta Dayand Date Represented through Respondent Represented CR/3a40/2023 Case titled as Manish Bhatla vs Brahma city Private Limired & Adani Brahma Synersy Pvt Ltd.

Tuesday and 27.05.2025 Shn Ankitproxycounsel Erahma Synersy Pvt Ltd.

ShriHarshit Batra Adv. for R2 Brahma Crry Private Lrmrted & Adrni Application for withdrawal Proceeding Record€d by Naresh Kumari and HR M.hr, Proceedings-cum'o.der the present complarnt srands The counsel for the complainant has moved an appticalron dared 06.05 20?

5 lor wnhdrawal oI rhe mmplarnant on rhe 8rounds rhal the matrer h.s been settled amicably between the parnes and a copy ot setttement deed dated 31.03.2025 has been placed on record. ,,t!;'*,ffi Chairman 27.05.2025 " *;;n;;;-nuu!ffi rc-.ll timio. dn rh! !n i! ln view of the terms of the settlemenr deed, disposed oi lrile beconsigned to the registry.