Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

MEENAKSHI SHARMA THROUGH SPA GHANSHYAM SHARMA vs VATIKA LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-3675-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing21 Nov 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MEENAKSHI SHARMA THROUGH SPA GHANSHYAM SHARMA
Respondent
  • VATIKA LIMITED

Case Summary

MEENAKSHI SHARMA THROUGH SPA GHANSHYAM SHARMA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-3675-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against VATIKA LIMITED. The case has undergone 16 hearings over 1 year and 11 months. The case is currently pending. 17 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (16)

  • 21NOV 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 31OCT 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Order reserved. Matter to come up on 21.11.2025 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 24OCT 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR

    Due  to the Administrative exigencies,  the matter is adjourned to 31.10.2025 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26SEP 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Due  to the Administrative exigencies,   the matter is adjourned to 24.10.2025 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 22AUG 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter to come up on 26.09.2025 for final arguments/orders.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 23MAY 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter to come up on 22.08.2025 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28MAR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter to come up on 23.05.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24JAN 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint has been received on 18.08.2023 and the reply was received on 29.03.2024.  On 19.04.2024, the counsel for the complainant stated that the complainant has paid a sum of Rs.24.52 Lakhs while proof of having paid a sum of Rs. 14,76,466/- is on record.  They were directed to clarify the payment made to the respondent and to file the statement of account. Even after various directions, the cost of Rs.10,000/- is still pending on the respondent for filling late reply. Waiver of cost application is filed by respondent on 17.07.2024 is declined. Costs shall be paid by the respondent before the next date of hearing. The counsel for the complainant states that the proof of payment of the amount being claimed will be filed within 15 days after supplying a copy to the counsel of the respondent. Matter to come up on 28.03.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 27SEP 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint has been received on 18.08.2023 and the reply was received on 29.03.2024.  The proxy counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment as the main arguing counsel is not available today due to medical exigency in the family of arguing counsel. Request is allowed. The previous cost shall be paid before the next date of hearing. In the meanwhile the counsel for the complainant to clarify the amount paid. The counsel for the complainant states that requisite clarification is in para No.4 which includes the amount paid in cash but no receipt is attached and hence may further substantiate its claim of payment.   Matter to come up on 24.01.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint has been received on 18.08.2023 and the reply was received on 29.03.2024. Case has  been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant today.  One more and last opportunity is granted to the complainant to appear and to pursue the matter. Matter to come up on 27.09.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 5JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint has been received on 18.08.2023 and the reply was received on 29.03.2024.   Vide last date of hearing i.e 19.04.2024 the counsel for the complainant stated that the complainant  has paid a sum of Rs.24.52 Lakhs while proof of having  paid a sum of Rs. 14,76,466/- is on record.  They have directed to clarify the payment made to the respondent and to file the statement of account. The counsel for the respondent stated that  they have moved an application u/s 192, 193, 194 and 506 IPC for filing false affidavit w.r.t payment made to the respondent. Both the parties were directed to reconcile the account. The counsel for the complainant states that the respondent has not paid the previously imposed cost till date. However they have filed the reply on 29.03.2024 as stated by the counsel for the respondent but the complainant has not received the copy of reply till date.  The respondent is hereby directed to pay the previously imposed cost within 2 weeks and to hand over one more copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant failing which the defence will be struck off. Matter to come up on 26.07.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 19APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint has been received on 18.08.2023 and the reply has been received on 29.03.2024. The counsel for the complainant states that the complainant  has paid a sum of Rs.24.52 Lakhs while proof of having  paid a sum of Rs. 14,76,466/- is on record.  They have directed to clarify the payment made to the respondent and to file the statement of account. The counsel for the complainant also  states that he has not received the copy of reply as well as previously imposed cost whereas the counsel for the respondent states that he has already filed the reply on 29.03.2024.  They are hereby directed to supply a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant and pay the previously imposed cost also. The counsel for the respondent states that  they have moved an application u/s 192, 193, 194 and 506 IPC for filing false affidavit w.r.t payment made to the respondent. Both the parties are directed to reconcile the account and come for arguments on 05.07.2024.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 5APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    As per the order dated 29.03.2024, the case was adjourned today for payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/-. Cost of Rs. 10,000/- not paid on behalf of the respondent. At this stage, application for waiver of cost filed on behalf of the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that cost of Rs. 10,000/-imposed vide order dated 01.03.2024 may be waived. On the other hand, it is submitted that on behalf of the complainant that as respondent is not adhering order with regard to payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/- so the defence of respondent may be struck off. Now the matter is listed before the Authority on 19.04.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29MAR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Reply filed by the respondent in the registry today taken on record. Cost of Rs. 10000/- not paid. Adjournment requested. Now the case is adjourned for 05.04.2024 for payment of Cost of Rs. 10000/- subject to last opportunity.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 1MAR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Neither reply filed nor cost of Rs. 5000/- paid. Adjournment requested. In the interest of justice case is adjourned for 29.03.2024 for filing reply subject to total cost of Rs. 10000/- failing which defence of respondent shall be struck off.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 24.08.2023 and registered as complaint No. 3675 of 2023. Written reply has not been filed by the respondent. The respondent is directed to file a reply in the registry of the authority after supplying a copy to  the complaint within 2 weeks failing which  cost of Rs. 5000/- shall be paid to the complainant. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent shall be  struck off. The matter to come up on  1.3.2024   for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (17)