Meta Pixel
CNR: --
RE-OPEN/PENDING

ANUJ KUMAR vs MS RELIABLE REALTECH PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-2079-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing8 Oct 2024
Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • ANUJ KUMAR
Respondent
  • MS RELIABLE REALTECH PVT LTD

Case Summary

ANUJ KUMAR filed Case No. RERA-GRG-2079-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against MS RELIABLE REALTECH PVT LTD. The case has undergone 11 hearings over 2 years. The case is currently pending. 19 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (11)

  • 8OCT 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR ASHOK SANGWAN

    Order pronounced. Refund is allowed after deduction of 10% of the sale consideration alongwith prescribed rate of interest i.e. 11.10% per annum from the date of filing of complaint till its realization. Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 17SEP 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    Due to lack of Coram,  the matter is adjourned to 08.10.2024 for the purpose already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 25.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2079 of 2022.  The above-mentioned compliant was disposed of vide order dated 13.02.2024 but however, while preparing the order it was observed that the complainant made a statement on 02.01.2024, to take possession of the subject unit which is contrary to the relief sought by the complainant in the present complaint. Subsequent on 13.02.2024,  the counsel for the respondent stated at bar that the respondent is willing to refund the   amount deposited by the complainant along with prescribed arte of interest as requested by the complainant while filing the complaint. Thus, for proper disposal of complaint and in view of natural justice, the matter is listed for re-hearing.   Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant today.       Both the parties are granted one more opportunity to file written submissions within a period of 2 weeks failing which the matter shall be decided on the basis of facts available on record. Matter to come up on 17.09.2024 for orders.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 7MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Due to administrative exigency,  the matter is adjourned to 02.07.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 13FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 2JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    Order could not be pronounced.  On the last date of hearing, the counsel for the complainant stated that the complainant- allottee is now willing to take the possession & settlement talks are in progress with the respondent to amicably settle the matter. However, no application to the above effect has been filed by the complainant.   None is present on behalf of the complainant. One more and last opportunity is being given to the complainant to file the application if the complainant is willing to take the possession. The proxy counsel for the respondent states during the proceedings that respondent otherwise is willing to hand over the possession as OC of the unit has already been received and unit is also offered to the allottee.               Matter to come up on 13.02.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Order not pronounced today. The counsel for the complainant states that the complainant- allottee is now willing to take the possession and settlement talks are in progress with the respondent to amicably settle the matter. An application to this effect is being filed by the complainant. Matter to come up on  02.01.2024 for filing settlement deed/announcement of order.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10OCT 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 25.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2079 of 2022. On 25.1.2023, Ms. Neha Sharma Advocate, appeared on behalf of the respondent and filed power of attorney and requested for a short adjournment for filing of reply. The said request was allowed, and the respondent was directed to file the reply within two weeks i.e., 08.02.2023, in the registry of the authority.            The counsel for the respondent has filed an application dated 26.06.2023, for dismissal of complaint with regard to the claim against the respondent in connection with date of deemed occupation certificate, the respondent has filed a CWP no. 16873-2020 and the same is pending before the Hon’ble Punjab and High Court for 10.10.2023.             On the last date of hearing, 20.07.2023, the counsel for the respondent stated that there is stay order by the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in above CWP vide order dated 30.09.2022 and further the offer of possession has already been made to the complainant and OC in respect of the unit is also received from the competent authority.     Succinct facts of the complaint are as under: S.N. Particulars Details 1. Project name and location “Antriksh Heights”, Sector 84, Gurugram 2. Project area 23.10 acres 3. Nature of project Residential group housing colony 4. RERA registered/not registered Not registered 5. DTPC License no. 123 of 2008 dated 14.06.2008 Validity status 13.06.2018 Name of licensee Reliable Realtech Pvt. Ltd. 6. Occupation Certificate details OC received dated 19.05.2016 for tower/block- Ø AF (ground floor to 17th floor) Ø AG (ground floor to 9th floor) Ø AH (ground floor to 7th floor) Ø AI (ground floor to 9th floor) Ø AJ (ground floor to 9th floor) Ø AL (ground floor to 18th floor) Ø EWS (ground floor to 10th floor) OC received dated 14.10.2016 for tower/block- Ø AE (ground + 1st floor to 19th floor) Ø AG (10th floor to 19th floor) Ø AH (8th floor to 19th floor) Ø AI (10th floor to 19th floor) Ø AJ (10th floor to 19th floor) OC received dated 07.02.2020 for - Primary School (Ground floor to 3rd floor) 7. Respondent claiming deemed occupation certificate in respect of following towers Ø Tower AA – 80 Units, Ø Tower AB – 80 Units, Ø Tower AC – 74 Units, Ø Tower AD – 80 Units, Ø Tower AE - 40 Units Balance, Ø Tower AK - 71 Units Ø Tower AM – 160 Units Ø EWS          – 107 Units Ø Convenient shopping, Community center, balance part of the basement 8. Occupation Certificate details OC received dated 21.09.2020 for tower/block- Ø AA (ground floor to 19th floor) Ø AB (ground floor to 19th floor) Ø AC (ground floor to 18th floor) Ø AD (ground floor to 19th floor) Ø AE (ground floor to 19th floor) Ø AK (ground floor to 18th floor) Ø AM (ground floor to 19th floor) Ø EWS block (ground floor to 10th floor) Ø 2 no’s Convenient Shopping Type- 1 (ground only) Ø Community Building (ground floor to 1st floor) 9. Unit no. 1202, 14th floor, Tower/block- AM measuring 1350 sq. ft. (Page 23 of the complaint) 10. Date of allotment letter 13.04.2012 (Page 40 of the complaint) 11. Date of execution of agreement 09.08.2012 (Page 21 of the complaint) 12. Possession clause 12. POSSESSION, RIGHTS AND INTERESTS The Owner and Allottee(s) shall be bound by the rules and regulations of Haryana Apartments Ownership Act 1983. The Owner shall construct the Apartment as early as possible and within 3 years, from the start of construction work unless due to unavoidable circumstances, it is not possible to do so, however, time is not the essence of this Agreement to Sell in this regard. If the construction is completed earlier, the possession thereof can be delivered even earlier. The objections of the Allottee(s) in this regard are not tenable/ entertain able. (Page 28 of the complaint). 13. Due date of possession 09.08.2015 Note: Date of commencement of construction is not given by either of the parties.  Thus, the due date of handing over the possession is calculated from the date of execution of the said agreement i.e., 09.08.2012 14. Total sale consideration Rs.56,84,000/- (As alleged by the complainant, page 18 of complaint) 15. Total amount paid by the complainant Rs.54,46,569/- (As alleged by the complainant, page 18 of complaint)   Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant.  During last proceedings also, none was present on behalf of the complainant.  The counsel for the respondent states at bar that  part occupation certificate in respect of the above project was initially received on 19.05.2016, next OC on 14.10.2016 and for remaining towers, the OC was applied but has been granted by the authority only on 21.09.2020, although the application for OC was made on 18.10.2016  and no order in respect of said application was passed by DTCP within the limitation period and hence, it is considered as deemed OC w.e.f.  19.12.2016 in terms of Section 23 (5) of Haryana Building Code, 2016.  A CWP No.16873 of 2020 is also preferred before the Hon’ble HC for declaring the above deemed OC w.e.f. 19.12.2016.  But without prejudice to the same, the Department has finally granted OC only on 21.09.2020 wherein  the unit of the complainant allottee is situated. The complaint for seeking refund has been filed only on 25.05.2022 after grant of OC and offer of possession and hence, if refund is to be allowed, the same may be granted only after deduction of 10% earnest money alongwith other statutory taxes as already decided in CR No.5031/2019  in case titled as Parveen Khurana versus SS Group. None is present on behalf of the complainant. One more and last opportunity is being given to the complainant to file written submissions, if any, within 10 days with an advance copy to the respondent. Order reserved. Matter to come up  on 28.11.2023 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 20JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 25.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2079 of 2022. On the last date of hearing Ms. Neha Sharma Advocate, appeared on behalf of the respondent and filed power of attorney and requests for a sought short adjournment for filing of reply. The said request was allowed, and the respondent was directed to file the reply within two weeks i.e., 08.02.2023, in the registry of the authority.   The counsel for the respondent has filed an application dated 26.06.2023, for dismissal of complaint with regard to the claim of the respondent in connection with date of deemed occupation certificate, the respondent has filed a CWP no. 16873-2020 and the same is pending before the Hon’ble Punjab and High Court for 30.09.2023. So, in view of the matter being sub-judice with regard to date of occupation certificate and the complaint having been filed seeking refund after offer of possession, the same may be adjourned sine die or be adjourned after 30.09.2023, i.e., date fixed before the Hon’ble High Court in the aforesaid matter.   Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant. One opportunity is being to file objection, if any, to the above application of respondent for dismissal of complaint. The counsel for the respondent also states that there is stay order by the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in above CWP vide order dated 30.09.2022 and further  the offer of possession has already been made to the complainant and OC in respect of the unit is also received from the competent authority.   Matter be listed before the full bench on 10.10.2023 on the issue of maintainability of complaint.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 25JAN 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 25.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2079 of 2022.  Written reply has not been filed by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply. Respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 08.02.2023 in the registry with a copy to the complainant. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off. Matter to come up on 20.07.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20SEP 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    In order to constitute new Bench and to revise roaster of cases, the matter is adjourned to 25.01.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (19)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

*HARERA dl eunue mr,,r R/o: H.no 156, Se.tor4, Rohta\ BEFORE'IHE HARYAIIA RIAL E5 shn Raghlveid.r siigh Counselrorrhe esponden' nn l I 'the prcsenr.omptrint has heen rited by thc .omptahr /a orc. u riorm CRA unJ& section 3t of the ReaL Esare (RcBut3notr n Developmentl Act, 2016 tin short, ihe ^ctl rad wr[ 'trte 28 or ih.

RE(,' #HARERA -6,4-L nL GaAM Haryana Real Esate (Resulaxon and Developmen.) Rules, 2017 (in .ho'r 'h".

P ro, \iotdr'onor,F inter alia prescribed that the promorer shal be responsible ror i]l obligadons, responsibilities ahd tu agreemert lor sale executed intersethen Prol.cr a.d unti r€latcd d€bits Thep riculats of th. projed, the amounr ot sate .onsid.m.on rhr anouDt paid by the.onptardtt.te of proposed handrtr3 ovcr rhe possesion, delay period, if a., have beei ,leraitcd ,i rhe Jollowrrll F-m; HARERA > At (sroundaodrroe flooa , ALkrcrdnmrb rshitm4 , Ews(srouidnoorrolodloon oc Eccrved d.cd 1{10.2016ror > aE tsround ' 1., floor h 'e r Ac { 10r floor ro r$ aoon , aH {ssfloorro lesaool) > Ar(10'hflffh re nooil P maD nhoo LLruu i roo r w ac @ound'rm.b rahaodl aD(gm$dnoorto redirddn AEGround'roorro1e, notr) A((cround aoorro 13t fiotrl AM (grourd fl oor ro lec,roq) Ews br4k (smund irm. b 10r HARERA GUllUGNAM > conmu y su,tdhs Gtuun; 1ro.

14b nooi rowei/brod AM {P,8err d n .onri, rt /gft ,:i I ,u\, i I \e.\ I vF FIAT SURL tlerut aa be d.iw.ed dq @ttt{ rh. abje.no6 oI rhe athtue(t i tht resord dre nottetubte/ ehxtun obh *HARERA # cLrnrr,nau hardrry over the pose$on sl.ulated Fon the d . otuielution [. ,","--,* *, ," * (As rrd by th. n,rP rm FB.rs tAsnxed bydEq,mp amr rrr!

The cohplainatrthas made the tottowinBsuLhhsions rn rhe.ornp tr fr i That th. .omplarnant was on ths tookout to pumhare. n D rll. ycar2012 For this purposqthecohrla,nant wer. approa.hert by rhe broker of r6pondent who show.d the bro.hurcs of tht upomins proisr .anbtksh Helchb, tedor lr4, (;un,B,4D Haryam falling in the .cvenue e Districr curuemm to the.omplaininr and enriced hrm to tro. rm to tro.I i I ii lharrhecomplainantbookeda0atbeannsno t2O2,bLo.k.AM otr 12, floorwith a superarcaofl3S0 sq ft withanex.tuslverghrlo us.

1', .ar parking spa.e r the abovemcntioNd pqcd or rrr, respondenr. rh.totalsate.onside':tionqasRs s6ar000/ whtrh * HARERA S, c rn lCn,cM in.ruded the basi. pr.king chaBes and other .harsas erdusive or s.lrr r.rr ro,rplainiDt was irsued an a otirenr lero. d3red iJor 20t2 b! iii. rhatthe.ohptai'rai!andrerDondentsadr.cdrtrb:btr,Lderbur.

2012.

The ir mri{\\ o, ir 13(Lrl, th. respondeDr h.r the sote ard erdusve r€hr to dirr I 3o,i simple Drcrei D.zse of delay orpiymeDt by rhr jllo(rr nr.l shnllaho hold the righttocan.el the bookingaDd torfc herimr( n'otrey paid by the aloree.

A.cordLng to ctause ]l or d! s.tro a8reement locly payment oral dues and.h3rge5 i 3..(rt(nr p'erequkre, ihptyrfB thai nre b oily in as nuch as it is appli.abh ro th. p.lymcnr Ly rrr allorees/.onplaiMn$ and does nor bind the rspoDd.nc a,x,) riannerwhatsoeverasevidehibyrhe dausesifd lnr ftuv d.d i hodr rh.paniesrn case of brcach of rny.otrd,on iv lhat the .omplarnint demanded nnEty paynenr or $. norcl whi.h they paid on rimsaM h:sp,id ananroui( oJ Rs51,4ri 5rrr t' v.

That the complainant ws makihs timely paymenb to the iespondenB as and when demandsd but the respondent dhho.6tlyobkured thdsr.tusof theprclectwhich h evrdenr rronr the laa that compl.hant many tioes nade.alls s.eli4 narus of the con*ruaion sbtus of the projed but to no avail According to the schedule of payment, ihe payne.k were based u, d iSHARERA & ounue mrl .onnrudion hnkedplatrand the rsspoidenr has ro Iind over rh. po$ession orrhe flar in thrae year rron bookrng dre au bur l lt he nat to rhe.omplarnatrr Lr[ .onpuLnant has piid 9s % ofth. v' rh.r a..ordLis to th. bu'tder btryers 0e0ri.2012, the sheduLed date ro axplrcitlymer!onedinctausel2otthehurtderbuyccagieemrnr tsutno.onnru.hoi workhsdonen irontheroworwlr.rerlrr .omplaLnair bookd hn said unit Despre ih.nnR ro rhr pr!Dr. rhr pr!Dr.n plan and irs !mcline for cleanngrhe paym.nu ofdj. respond.n tl'e po$esnon of the unir h3s nor y.t beetr livrn ro rl| Relief sou8ht by th. conptaimnt: 'Ihe.ompla,nanr has sought lollowinA reti.{sl: to refund the anotrnr prd Dj, 1rr. .omplainafr alory with the pr€s(ihed rte of,nt.re{ D,rvrbr l.om the date ol paynenr made by rhe .ompLari ro ih.

FspondeDt til the d.te ot reatiz so.tion 19 ortheadrcad with iulc 1s ofthe Rutrs. il Diredtherespond.nttoconrpeDsarcthc.ooptarnrnrbypdrrsll ,ntere( @ 24% per ainum oi rhe :mouit :lreidy pi d .

Rl 54,46,s6e/ rrom rhetime was pad tiI date iil crant ary other ftLclir favour of rhr.oDptar,tr r\ thc ror trt. authoity nay deemfitirdpropc. in rhef..rJtrd I ..,nxhtr.r\dl as HARERA GUR1JGRAM on the date of head.g, rhe authoriry explai.ed to rh. rcspondetrV promoterabouttheconiave.tionsasalesed to have beei commin.d in relanon to s{tion 11(41(al ofthe ad to ptead suitty or notro ptead D 4ppl'.dtoi fu' di\mrul or cohplain' b\ rl'c re\pondrnr nn.

The respondcntno I has madethc lottowrgntbmisronsi r lhat the .onrplanr liled by the .onpLrinair bciore thp trotr htr Alihoritybesidcs being misconfttv.d and e oneour s unrcn.nn. inthccypsorLaw. lhe.omplainanrhrstrrdire.trd rtrx.rrf f tr rs rhe 3bove.aption.d conplaintbeforethis Hon ble^mhdf 1r axl \ nyingto trkr bcnefi torhis own hj Ad be,ng ahomebuyer flendlyrnd cetrnic awcrn mtruTdr. l,is advanrasc ac@rdinB to hh owh whmx and ranoes. i) That the complajnant has con.oded $o.irs ard r.ed o$ !r ention the entire mmplalnr is nothingbur. bundl! ot wl .

L[! wornonalfrdavitfiledhythaconplaiianrwhi.hn.rpt.,iorJ or tlktudthatthe.on,plarr.nrforthcprc.cssorLauhrnopI{dh nr so low th he har gohe to the extent ofcomhfung th. ofief.p or perlury '.e swearir8 a ralse aJtidavit berotu rhr o:rh CoD,missloner/Notary Public aid sub'niling rhr sanr. n rrrtr HonbLe,\urhorityitisnotourorpLa..tom.itioirh ihenro oo!) u. ]'hat the respondent is a reputed buttder ofhlgh '.putaron rid intqriiyand had. iyand had.ohpLiEd with alLthe trorN prcsmbod bl Id :nd othergovernmenr bodLcs and has.oistrtrded rrr Dror!d nL l frHARERA S elnlr+,u,r ;;;1, in all respects and needtes to mentiotr dre respofdcnr htr! brq, abLe to livc upro rh. shinSentte{s otthe covemmen( /ls.r..r r the narerorobraining o..upatr.y c theprovisioDorHaryanaBuildinsritancode 2016t/5r3(61\!rtr.1 t ra .rnnt enan 6 ddyed ta\ r F-,""d r,,q r,r;_! _, r, @.n"d rtu!rc" al ant\u,^ ".1-" r";; - t, That the !onrptahanr has wrongty iivoked d,e unsddoi orrl r Hon'bleAurhorirywitholteven having regald ro thr prc$ oi! ol the ,\.t which came into lorce on 01052017 .nd n..dless ro Dentionthesaidp.ovhronsoftheAdareprospedrve nD ureind .annorbe applied fetmspectively rr is the rerted prov s on or .N 'hr hr rq"r" n"s Eh prospedive in nature uDte$ the tegstarm itr rs owD r(r( decided to make iterospetiv€ in naruft.

Thar vide inrertm ordei of the Hon bte HiSh cour of pun]]b rrd Haryana whercb, ir was pt.ased to g.ant inteam siy oi h. subre.t marer.

Fulthdr, ii 12s aLso ohserved by rtre Hoi.b.

H,8h Lout0rPunlaband Haryana tha here was a Lipsr oi ih. r:n ol tl'e competent althonty a: the sah. war aho dcaf Ly n,ei.otrtd { I_33r1/ArP Il/2020/rr6,o whrch cleany menrion in the Scrial Nuhber 31 of rhc srd tuplr givcn by the.onperent authorty *HARERA S.c,LrnLrr+m,r v, Th* the.ompLainr 6led byrh !o bc dknissed atthe ihreshotd tevetbe.ause thc.onp r nt rr1 f ed bythe.ohpLainanton0s.0s 2 sDf! ot o..upan.y .erricat. ro rhe mspondent r,.od, rh. vii Thathere,rkequallyimporanttonefrionthatHonb.u.!no PunFb and aaryiia vide rs cwp r6373 2020 h:s aL..:dj s,!q the drifi.ation rhat thadeehed occtrpm.y.e( fi.at. lr.n ,jtrr:d! beetrhsuedtorhepspondehrcom! rydared r91z20r6trht crl r was 3ko be.n.lanfied hythe Hon ble punrab and N.,ryaitr lLrgh aourrtutthere Basa compldtelapseonthe pinoL tha.otr..nr.d autholt,lorissuan.eolthecon.emedo..upan.ycenr,L. .rothr respondenr .ompany noeithsahdlns dre samr Tho strr. [x alr. r. [x alr.ady been clarilied by the Hon ble punjab rxt Hilatrr rsf Cotrr nating rhat the deerned oc oI rhe rcsDotrdtit .oup.r\ should be.onsidered as 19.12 2016 so r is eqtr:[], mpo :nr ro mei.on here that the.u enr.ase N.ds to br dsms.d ,r rhreshold as n\e sah. is filed after dE sranr of o(trrdL! cert'ti.ate fro m the C o mp etent Authonty The prtsenr cohplaini was filed of 2s0s2022 in rh. a!rrjon1, 0tr several o..asions the .otrnscl ror rhr msPofdent tro I pur tr ,rppcarance and was dtre.ted ro fle the Epty wrh 2 weeks nr rr,r rtsnhyolth.Authorty. tn$ead otfilins repty,thc rerDond.nt no r hls filed rn appLicaron for dismissal of the.omphitrr atonB wrh iddtrtr, do.un,ents.

Fudher respondeit no.,t has ra ed ro put rn ipjlr.trn.. *& I]AIiERA GURUGRAM belor€ the aulhoriv and har also faited to 61e a repty. ln view of thc emq the maEer ts pm.eeded ex,padeagainn respondenr no 2.

3. copies ol all rel4ant docu ments have been frted and ptaced on re.od Th elr authennci9 is noi i. dispure Hence, th e comp taint .a n be de.id ed basd oh these undhputed doohenb and submissions ha& bv lurisdrcrion orthe.uthoriq 'rl,erthoriq obsefrcs th ih6 l!rtrrlidion to idjudnate the picsentcomptJnt Jor dje D.r re mnorir r , u rhdiction 10.

As ppr N!6.dion m. verl20t7 1.rcp da@d 1411.2017 $ntd hy 'Iown rnd coutrEy titanoinsDepirtmcit rhe iuIisd..or orNer r*r.n.

ReFul,(oryAu$ority, CtrrusEo sha| bc.ntne euru!nnr D *, rl aor rl purposr wirh offi.6 situared in curuSran tn thr presprr ..trc t]I. projecr rn qupsuon is situted withrn the p atrning 3r.: of ctrrug il Dnhrt 'Ihe rcfo E, th r autho ty has .ompleted rerirori3l !nsd(on todcaLwith rhe prsentomptaint E.D suhjcamrerturisdi.don 11. sedDi 11{4lGl ofrhe a( r0r6 provtrlcs rh3tnje p.omor.r njir hr respotrsibletorhealloree asperasrperneir ror salc s{t oi t1(1t(rlr rcprodtr.ed as hereuDder b ts@tud. h. o| obttsoibnt rewDbrnes ond lvuaaf und4 de Fqitun' at 6h ad q k ., .eenent ht tutu, q b 6e TTHARERA $-c,rrnrrr*rv at d. r*rv at d. @nu ottu tu the asqgrhn al ou.|tit.|'deaftno'b.: k ion 3+Fqctius oItu aulodr: 344 ol.h.

Adprcyides b 4eE.ohptzre at the obtain^ 12. sq in visw of the povisiohs or rhe Act quoied above, the authonry ha! .ohplete ju nsdiction to de.ide thd comptarnt rqaldrng non.omplrn( of obl,gationsbytheDrohoterteavjngasidecompensaoon wh,ch u to b. decided by the adjudicatingoiicer f puEued by the comptai.a0r ar a latcr r3 rtrrther, th!sutho.ityhas nohit.h Ln pro.eedruwrh dr.onpr, tosmiti reli., ii the preserr natter ir view or the u !.nrefr r.$r L)\ nre Hon Lrte ,lpcx Coun m xewte.h pronotets ond Dewtope\ prtuak Ltnited vs state oJ u.p, ond oB, 2021.2a220) RcR(c), 3s7 .!\l reireratrd n.a$otrr Srna xeo kots prilaE Lihit?d & arhet v\ |rto oI rndia & dhqs slp (civir) No 13oas of 202a d.cided on 12.as.2r22 ., whare tr ithas baaD aid doui rs Drd.r h6. hdn d. $reh" at.\.

Adot*hrh o dioibd 1lqde h6 b?n nod, rnd bhnq rok ot pMr ot adpdtlno atduity and odt'dtunns otf.e. vhu tEu 4k @r E hd dda@h , reird., 1rtan , .@oh/ oad rahpch;onon, " hajtut mdins ol tedioil 13 ond 1e .hqt nor4$^ ttur vha t rtres b eturd ot the anoht, ahd h\.4t h the .elud ono,, v dn{thswdtathtp* tu ebrd dettftry otp6\4,ar @he aJ a @aptalrt arrr. ene THARERA GURUGRAI,,I rw, ebn r Qn* i q qwdat .l *ekns rc pkl t qtuts,t) dPd@rrsoJtet d!'ELr be po be atqt& eldiry at s.dar t red v6 kdat ?, al r. ^a i trt e attr?

Fvcs 0r tt\rat: tr ! ad)dd t np afi at lrrn eda\ 1 1 ad Hei.e i,rviewof rheauthonralvepronouD.eDeDlotthc otrhle\,p,onr Courtitr the.ase nenrioned above, the authorty has dre runar..otr il .rteitarn r.omphint sccking retund olthe aDrounr a,d m.r.n or rhr FindnEs on th€ rclief soushr by the.omplai.anrs Dire(r rl'e r€spond.hr lo rerund rhe amounr pr,,l bJ rhr complainanl to li alotr8 sith rh€ Drescribed rare of interesr parzble troh th€ datc oI p.yh.rt madebyrh..ompt.in.m !) the respondenttill th.ilat€ of reatia on as Der the provisions of s€ction 19 ofthe Ad re.d wtth rite. wtth rite.e* @ 24% pcr annun on rh s4,46,s6el.iroh the tim. n Uar plld ril darc 1s.

The.oDphiiantEsatrotrduhitbearingno.

1202, ground aoor Lniowc Avid.allotmenrler{datedl3.0420lzforatotaLsaleconsid.midf d Rs 56,34,000/ andthe.onrplarnanr has prid a nrn dftr\ ;i46,s6r/ 16.

Dunns the.oure ofpro.eedinBdared 1010 2023 rhe ftspond.Dt{drr at bar that pafr o.cupatioi cedfi.nte n rcspedofrheabo,cproredtri j 1:.d. -. a!.J 01rc 0. frHARERA S-G!RtGRAM towes, the 0c was appned but has ben 21 09 2020,althou8htheappltcation for no order in resp.dorsaid application linitaion period and hen.q it r w.e.t 19.122016 in terDs ofsedion 2 .oun Jo. declariig rh. above deemed o..upanon .{ rr(.Li o r9 1220r6 btrrwirhoutprejudi.etothe\anre,thelrcp3rtrtrrh,\ru I g.atrtd o..uparion .eninca& onty on 2r.09.2020 wher.ii tlk r ntr or rh, .omplainanfano@e r riturted.

The .oirplaint for sepI ns ].rtrr h:, heen nLcdotrLyon 25 05 2022 alie.granrolocand olLrorpo*r$rotr D( hai.e, if refund r ro be allowed, the same nEy be srj red r y.rrrr l"dl . o.'0o a. n", mo4Ji,gtrr orr.. .nlr.

Sranted by the authontyonly on ocwashad€o. l310.2016rnd wx pds€d by DTCP wfirn thc .onsidered a3 dem.d o.

2016 A CWP N0.16373 0f2o2o is,tso ol Haryana BuLLd'n3 (:od. red hefore rhe Hoi,b e HiEh fi eeLenrdil'rytrhcrerhapromor rr, to complere or unable to give Dosse$ion ol the un t tcms of agreehent r0r sale or duly .ompleted by rhc d . spcrbc( rh.min This is acase where rh.promorernas or.fer.d p.sresLoi or1in. unt aitcr obtarnin8 occupation.eiifi .ate atrd oi demand ordue payNrr rthetim.of offerof po$esson thealoreewrhestowrhdra$trori rhl prorc.t and d.niand refund otths anotrnt re.erved by dr promor., , respedolthe unitwith interpnar rhc presrib.d Ete. (sl l7 5tut oi rBlll 6,pptr.rbteonty,n I HA R GL] RA NAM RE L]G 3.

Th€ due dare of poss6ion as per buy€r s aSresnent as mennoned Ln ih. tabre abov. is 09.03.2015.

The complaintforseeking retu.d has be.n rited onry on 2s.05.2022 afte!

Srant o possesion.

The complai.ant has ptead. has ptead.d thatthe porscsion rdetay.d, aid ihe connrudion b sdn in.ohplete The pt€a or rhe .onrdrinaii however, isdevoid ormerit.Atthecoiorreperition, t is hishlighted rh?r ihe k.upation clnfiete hs al(&dy been sra.ted by th( (ntrern.o ., rhi r Jnr ihu .

I L uihjrtu ey thr th. project s i'll i.compt.re .onplaint on 2s 0s 2022 whrt sc$ioi of the suhjed unit wtrs oftcr.d to hiir rrtrr obhr I i: ceitiricate by the promoter The aLLoree nrfcr .j rr ed to withdraw n.on the projecr even trrrer rhr du. drr I pose$ion and only whe. ofer dt po$esion was hadc ro h h ar. donand for due payment was raised then ontv he has,Lcd prs.r .omplaint beforc the authority 20 -IheallotteehasnoiexercisedtheighrrowithdrawtroDjthep.orcdinr thedue date ofpo$e$ioi was over, til the orferofposer.oi was Ndl ro them.

This implies reans th rhe allottee tacrty wuhed ro.on.nu. wth thc prolect The prohoter has ati$dy ,rvened rn dre p.orm L po$esron of rhe:Iored Inr t]rd rhr .omplJ'n:ntwRhrd roro0nnue'n theprot.t the p ovidd np ovrotosecnon tstrlwoutdrome,n ITHARERA S arnr,naur uou d he hab e io pay 'iterer:t delay iin the ha.din8 ove. or po$ 21 The Dronoter is .esponslble for a[ obtigaaons, responrb ries and fu.eioN under ths provislo.s of the A.r of 2016. or the le\ and ready ror posession, su.h wirhJ pro'norer to give posession by due dat..ither by Llay.frenLnd Lroprld hy the allorees orby way ofdetay poscsion cha4cs d pres.r nred i I olinteren for ever] motrth oldetay 22 rn.aseittoreewrhestowrhdrawrrohrhcprolecr rh.p,onncrrrrir on demand ro rhe allotree ro retu ri rhernoufrr...,ved hrrhcp,ond.l r'ln'nrere{rr he prN "beo ..r. promots, tr \.o, omptsreo, .ndoF ac.ordance with rh. iermr or rh. msur:!ons nrde thcreunder or to 'rhtrludsenrentotrheSuppneCourtortndL.,.c.ogi zeduDq!, rirdrfrj orthe,nlotepri,dtiabrlnlotthepromorerrf .a!coff,, lr cro.onDfn or rMbLe ro givc po*esion orth duly.ompletedbylhcdatespe.iJi.d.rr!roi niLr failsd to exc.che his nghr dre rpuoprai. nis.

Lnve$hent purel]' on spe. ]' on spe.uLarive bass wiI Dor b. ]i rlrr se.non 13 whtrh proteds tha riSht ort& i ott.es ii r:s. ru sivc pusesion or ihe unr l}HARERA H annmr,,r asreahent tor sale.

The words tiabteon dcmand necd to 6e trDdern(nt nthesefsetharaUorteehastohakehri entioisdeartowrhd.awLuf lhe prore.r and a lositive action on his part to demrnd rarrm or rrr, ai,ount wiih rrescribed rare of interen tr hp has nor Nde anr {r l dcD:id p.ior ro re.eiving o..upa implieJlyhehasasreedro.ontinuewiththeprorc.tLe tredo.sfo( ntdnj ro wirhdnw rrom rhe proj.d and rhc prooso to so.LoD LB auohaticlly .omes rnro opentbn aid.nLoree sh:lt ba p.d br rrn, pro,norer 'ntere* at the Dres.ribed rate for every moDrh ofdeL,y b) rhf prcDorer Thisviewissupponedbythciudgenenrof onblesuptun. .oun or lndla in.aseofrrscEce R.alr€ch pr Ltd, verus Abhshek Khannaandors,(ctvitapp.dlno,sTssofzole)and.nro a( !rr.rr, with rhe ludsemenr ol Hon,bte supreme cour or lnd,a nr Gf or M/s Newt&h Pronot€rs.nd DevctoD€rs pvt, Lrd v€rsussrareof u p.and 23 The .omplainant has approach.d tie authoriq for rh. refund or h . dtpositedamouitarabetatadnage Thertrthority\rhtrsordjer.rrhl ro e(urc ofearne( morcyr ne.esstr.y to malQsood ro rhr ro*os d thr '" po' d" .. hohr\,ompt"'"o'h the utrir The dedu.tion should be mide as pe, rtje Ha,vaN kGL rrr,{!

Reguhtory Authority Curu8ram [Forfe]ture of camen moiev bl rhr blideaResutalons,l]islo,20t3 whL.h$tesrhar *HARERA S- c n r-n,qr,r k4 lo yir. b 6?

R@t*rt (R4darat, @d D4.1\r4 )\! t)6 w4htl.rcni tioud:e*eqtEdor$$ t a\ l-4. q hlc qil N ha lat tht un. but ra\ )r \]-a|| oJ i. dDw lxn\ qt lrkr! fi ,-0. -.. .,.;. t?t.: ". -p-_.

6 ol tlP v-r\| trrt the k+r'c rhaqt al ih. @n6t fury hdt rc! ccd nue.hcn la al rc @NidNtutln ! naut at de pr {a e t ! rphae /Pbt/br dtrs o d? @p n drcq ltur n4 yqLt qtd r, rth.a1t4 ryqrrur 4\rj 24 H.i.e, the adhority hereby dire.ts th. prcnokr ro .rtuid rh. r,r d qr anouDrof ns.s4,46,569/ toth?comptaimm;ft.dcd!.notr.r10r or rhe sah .onsideralon. sideralon.

The respohdenr is lurthar dredrd ro pry I j Itrteren on theb3tan.e amountardre r{e of 11.109! ithe i,ir B.rrk.r lndE hishe$ marSl.alco* oflendins rate iMcLR)rpDtrn,b c b oi d.r. r2%) is prescnbcd unde.rule 1s ofthe Haryana ReJtEnatc (ReSuL.nro and Dcvclopmenrl Rul.s,2017lro the datr ol tiliq or.oriflarn L!

25 0s 2022 tilliheadualdateofrefundofthcarnounts nr tr $e!irc r r.r prov'ded Ln rul.

16oltheruter2017. c. trtrections or the audorit, 2s Hei.e, rhe rhorty hereby pases rtu order atrd smds dr?d'ons under sedron 37 of the acr ro cnsup.o'nplritr.e .an upon the prohotu as per rhe futr.rion enruned & fiHARERA $- c,rnrc+nl,r The respondent i: dkected b return rhe paid-up amounr or Rs s4,46,s69l- to lhe.omplai.ant after dedudloh or 10% olrhc sat. consideiaiio. alongvith an inEhrto. the batahd€amounrar the rao of11.10% (the stat€ Bankofrndia hrghest margilal.on o endinB rate (MCLR) appricable as on date +2%l as prescribed under rute rs of theHaryanaRealE$atd(RegutationandDevelopmenr) Rutes 20r / HARERA\t_.? ! |J (!mrrr,^J ,2s.0s2022rlrure:du: irrr t h n€s n'ov dd,n r! ! ,,, **'' Arun Xumar Chai.Mn Haryana Real Est.

Regutatory ludiority, cutugram

Similar Cases

⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs RAJDEEP KAUR BAMRAH
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2019PENDING
⚖️
ANIL SHARMA vs GEO CONNECT LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING
⚖️
VIVEK SINGH CHAUHAN vs RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING
⚖️
AYESHA JAGGI AND ANJALI JAGGI vs PAREENA INFRASTUCTURE PVT LTD
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2024PENDING
⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs RITU SAREEN
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2019PENDING