MANISH ANEJA vs REVITAL REALITY PVT.LTD.
- MANISH ANEJA
- REVITAL REALITY PVT.LTD.
The case MANISH ANEJA vs REVITAL REALITY PVT.LTD. concerns GRG matters under RERA-GRG.
The case is filed in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) (Case No. RERA-GRG-1944-2023).
The current case status is pending, last heard on 10 Jan 2024. Next hearing is scheduled for 3 Apr 2024.
Judge: N/A
In compliance of previous order dated 04.10.2023, complainant filed amended complaint with the registry on 10.10.2023 and same is taken on record. Ld. counsel for complainant submitted that copy of amended complaint already supplied to the respondent. At this stage learned counsel for respondent submitted reply on behalf of respondent duly filed in the registry today itself. Reply taken on record. Copy of reply also supplied to learned counsel for petitioner. As pleading complete so now case is listed before authority for 03.04.2024 for final arguments. Both parties informed accordingly.
Judge: N/A
The present complaint was filed on 09.05.2023 and registered as complaint No. 1944 of 2023. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 16.05.2023 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected], [email protected] and the same is shown to has been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file. It is a proper service of the notice. Counsel for the respondent states that the complainant has impleaded M/s Supertech Limited as Respondent NO.2, whereas the respondent no.2 has nothing to do with this complaint and the complainant had entered into BBA with Respondent no.1 which is Revital Reality Pvt. Ltd and all payments were made by the complainant to respondent no.1. Now since the respondent no.2 is already in NCLT, the proceedings cannot be continued against Respondent no.2. Counsel for the complainant is requesting to amend the complaint and to remove respondent no.2 from the complaint. Request is allowed. The counsel for the complainant is directed to file the amended complaint within one week after supplying a copy to the counsel for the respondent who shall file reply within further 15 days in the registry of the authority. The matter to come up on 10.01.2024 for further proceedings.