Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

PRATIBHA KHAN AND AFZAL AHMED KHAN vs VATIKA LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-3623-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing15 Jul 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • PRATIBHA KHAN AND AFZAL AHMED KHAN
Respondent
  • VATIKA LTD.

Case Summary

PRATIBHA KHAN AND AFZAL AHMED KHAN filed Case No. RERA-GRG-3623-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against VATIKA LTD.. The case has undergone 7 hearings over 1 year and 7 months. The case is currently pending. 9 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (7)

  • 15JUL 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR ASHOK SANGWAN

    Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 1APR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter to come up on 15.07.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 17DEC 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter to come up on  01.04.2025 before the full bench for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12SEP 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The Present complaint was filed on 16.08.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 14.12.2023. On 21.03.2024, the counsel for the respondent was directed to file the status of completion of the unit along with reasons for accepting of more 10% of sale consideration without entering into buyer’s agreement. On last date of hearing (i.e., 30.05.2024), the respondent was given one more and last opportunity for filing of written submissions along with clarification of status of unit within 3 weeks failing which it shall be presumed that the respondent has nothing to say and further proceedings may be initiated against the respondent. In the present complaint, the complainant is seeking payment of assured return and hence may be heard by the Full bench. Matter to come up on 17.12.2024 before Full Bench for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The Present complaint was filed on 16.08.2023 and The reply on behalf of respondent was received on 14.12.2023. The counsel for the respondent was directed to file the status of completion of the unit along with reasons for accepting of more than 10% consideration money without BBA but no response is filed so far. One more and last opportunity for filing of written submissions along with clarification of status of unit within 3 weeks is given failing which it shall be presumed that  the respondent has nothing to say and further proceedings may be initiated against the respondent. Matter to come up on 12.09.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 21MAR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The  present complaint was filed on 16.08.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 14.12.2023. The proxy counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment as the arguing counsel is not available today due to health issue.  Request is allowed. The counsel for the complainant states that  despite having paid Rs. 50,56,625/- against a total consideration of Rs.68,25,000/-,  BBA is not yet executed and neither the assured return from November 2018 not paid.  The amount paid as well as consideration amount is duly admitted by the respondent  in para No.12 of the reply at page No.5. The respondent is not intimating the status of completion of the unit  for which the respondent is directed to file the status of completion of the unit alongwith  specific unit number and reasons for accepting more than 10% of consideration money without execution of BBA. Matter to come up on 30.05.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 14DEC 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 16.08.2023 and registered as complaint no. 3623 of 2023. The counsel for the respondent has handed over a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings and shall file the same in the registry within a period of one week. The respondents are directed to file reply within  one week  in the registry. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondents shall be struck off. Matter to come up on 21.03.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (9)