SEEMA SACHDEV vs ADTV COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED

The present complaint has been received on 06.10.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent has not been received within the stipulated time period despite service of notice. Therefore, in view of orders dated 19.10.2023, the respondent was proceeded ex-parte. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent today. The complainant has purchased the unit after the possession is handed over to Mr. Akash Atolia and seeking the relief that the area available is under wrong super area and the respondent charge only for the area as per BBA. However the main counsel of the complainant is not available to confirm the facts of the case and neither the respondent is putting in appearance. Matter to come up on 12.12.2024 for further proceedings.

The present complaint has been received on 06.10.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent has not been received within the stipulated time period despite service of notice. Therefore, in view of orders dated 19.10.2023, the respondent was proceeded ex-parte. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent today. The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the main arguing counsel is not available today. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 19.09.2024 for further proceedings.

The present complaint has been received on 06.10.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent has not been received within the stipulated time period despite service of notice. Therefore, in view of orders dated 19.10.2023, the respondent was proceeded ex-parte. On 10.01.2023 and 06.07.2023 the counsel for the complainant was requested to file an application for impleading the financial institution and the said request was allowed and the complainant was directed to file the same. The complainant has failed to file the said application till date. The counsel for the complainant clarifies that no such request for filing application was made and hence the above may be deleted/rectified from the earlier proceedings.  The allottee to whom the unit was allotted and offer of possession shall be impleaded as a party and an application for impleadment shall be filed within 2 weeks. Matter to come up  on 04.07.2024 for further proceedings.

The present complaint has been received on 06.10.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent has not been received within the stipulated time period despite service of notice. Therefore, in view of orders dated 19.10.2023, the respondent was proceeded ex-parte. On 10.01.2023 and 06.07.2023 the counsel for the complainant was requested to file an application for impleading the financial institution and the said request was allowed and the complainant was directed to file the same The complainant has not yet filed the said application till date. The proxy counsel for the complainant requests to confirm the same from the main counsel and shall be filing the requisite application if required within 15 days. Matter to come up on 14.03.2024 for further proceedings.

In pursuance of the orders dated 10.01.2023, a public notice was published in the newspapers “Dainik Jagran” (Hindi) and “the Tribune” (English) for appearance of the respondent with the directions to file written reply failing which ex-parte proceedings would be carried out against the respondent.  Neither the respondent has put in appearance despite publication in the aforesaid newspapers nor sent reply.  Therefore, the  defence of the respondent is hereby struck off. Matter to come up on 21.12.2023 for further proceedings.

In pursuance of the orders dated 10.01.2023, a public notice was published in the newspapers “Dainik Jagran (Hindi) and “the Tribune” (English) for appearance of the respondent with the directions to file written reply failing which ex-parte proceedings would be carried out against the respondent.  Neither the respondent has put in appearance despite publication in the aforesaid newspapers nor sent reply.  The Authority  has issued the publication in newspaper for the respondent to put in appearance  and to file reply. But neither the respondent is present nor any reply has been filed and hence, the authority decides to proceed exparte.  However during last proceedings the complainant has requested for impleading the Financial institution and an application to this effect was to be filed. But the application is not yet filed. One more opportunity is being given to the complainant to file requisite application after serving the copy to the concerned Financial institution if the complainant is  interested in impleading the financier as a necessary party.  The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment for filing the requisite application. Request is allowed.  Matter to come up on 19.10.2023  for further proceedings.

The present complaint was filed on 06.10.2022 and registered as complaint No. 6669 of 2022.  Case has been called out but none is present on behalf of the respondent.  The notice for appearance issued by the authority has also been returned back from the postal authorities with the remarks “shifted”  and hence, a public notice be issued within  one week by the registry of the authority in respect of all the items from serial No.52 to 56 for filing of reply within 4 weeks and putting  in appearance on the next date of hearing failing which the case shall be proceeded exparte.  Cost of publication shall borne by the complainant on sharing basis. The counsel for the complainant requests for impleading the financial institution from which the complainant has availed the loan as necessary party. Request is allowed.  Application for impleading the financial institution as necessary party be filed within next 2 weeks after supplying a copy to the respondent. Matter to come up  on 06.07.2023  for further proceedings.