Jalaparthi Srinivasa Rao vs Kondepati Satyanarayana
Party Details
- Jalaparthi Srinivasa Rao
- Kondepati Satyanarayana
- Abburi Ramachandram
Case Summary
Jalaparthi Srinivasa Rao filed Case No. 358 in the District Court on 10 Aug 2023 against Kondepati Satyanarayana and Abburi Ramachandram. The case has undergone 13 hearings over 11 months. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (13)
- 21AUG 2024DisposedView Order ↗
Judge: Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tadepalligudem
- 16AUG 2024ISSUESView Order ↗
Judge: Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tadepalligudem
- 26JUN 2024ISSUESView Order ↗
Judge: Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tadepalligudem
Orders (1)
- 21AUG 2024Copy of OrderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIORI DIVISION) :: TADEPALLIGUDEM PRESENT:- Smt.S.Surya Kiran Sri, Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Tadepalligudem Tuesday, this the 21st day of August, 2024.
O.S.No.358/2023 Between: Jalaparthi Srinivasa Rao, S/o Late Subba Rao, Hindu, Male, Cultivation, 53 years, Nallajerla village and Mandal. …Plaintiff And 1.Kondepati Satyanarayana, S/o Suranna, 58 years, Pothavaram, Nallajerla Mandal.
2.
Abburi Ramachandram, S/o Late Satyam, Hindu, Male, Cultivation, 60 years, Pothavaram, Nallajerla Mandal. …Defendants This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendants to grant permanent injunction against the defendants, their men, agents, successors in the tile, representatives and assigns from ever interfering with the plaintiffs lawful right and enjoyment of plaint schedule property and also not to cause obstruction to the plaintiff to drawn the water as per 1/3 undivided share from 5 HP motor and bore well under service connection No.2172 which is situated land of the 1st defendant to the plaint schedule property through pipe line which is shown in the plaint plan, and for costs of the suit.
This suit is coming on this day before me in the presence of Sri K.
Siva Rama Krishna, Advocate for Plaintiff and Sri Dasari Akanth, Advocate for D1 and D2 remained exparte, after having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following: O R D E R Both the plaintiff and D1 and D2 present.
Plaintiffs counsel also present.
Plaintiff filed a memo stating that after filing the above suit, plaintiff and defendants compromised before elders, as per terms and conditions of the compromise.
Hence, plaintiff intends to not press the suit.
Notice of memo is given to other side advocate.
Memo is recorded.
In view of said memo, the said suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court on this the 21st day of August, 2024.
Sd/-S.Surya Kiran Sri PRL. n Sri PRL.
CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION), TADEPALLIGUDEM No oral or documentary evidence is adduced on either side.
Id/- SSKS PJCJ., TPG.