State of U.P. vs ARIF

न्ययाययालययममुख्यममन्ययाययिकममुज स्टट्ट्, बयागपतमम मम उपजस्सतत (रत्नम्ममश्रीवास्तववास)मम(उ०प्र०ममन्ययाययिकममसट्वया) UP-02095 आदट्श पतयाक्लयलीमम/ चयालययााममपट्शममहखआ, पखिकयारममपरममिकई ममउपजस्सतममाहहह ममचयालययााममिकट्ममअववलयईिकाममसट्ममववददतममहखआ दिकममउकममबयालययााममपरममअवयभयखिकममिकयाममपतयाममअवहदिकतममाहहहममहह ममइसिकट्ममसमबन्नममुममिकयाययारलययममसट्ममआ्ययाममतलयबममिकक गयली ममिकयाययारलययममदयारयाममचयालययााममपरममअवयभयखिकममिकयाममपतयाममाममहईायाममअवहदिकतममदिकययाममगययाममतसयाममसहयायिकममअवयभयई ा अवयनिकयारहममदयारयाममबयालयाममिकईममअवग्रसयाररतममदिकययाममगयया उपरईकममपररजस्सयतययममुममवहममववददतममहईतयाममहहममदिकममचयालययााममपरममअवयभयखकममिकयाममपतयाममाममहईतयाममअवदिकत हईाट्ममिकट्ममिकररयावममचयालययााममयास्तयाररतममदिकययामम याायाममसमभवममाहहहममहह ममनयारया-258 भया०प्र०सह०ममयहममप्रयावनयााममिकरतली हहममदिकममin any summons-case instituted otherwise than upon complaint, a Magistrate of the first class or, with the previous sanction of the Chief judicial Magistrate, any other Judicial Magistrate, may, for reasons to be recorded by him, stop the proceedings at any stage without pronouncing any judgment and where such stoppage of proceedings is made after the evidence of the principal witnesses has been recorded, pronounce a judgment of acquittal, and in any other case, release the accused, and such release shall have the effect of discharge इसिकट्ममअवयतररकममयहयाहममयहममउललयट्खालीयममहहममदिकममुयााालीयममिकट्रलयममउचचममन्ययाययालययममदयारयाममस्वततममसहंयााममलयट्तट्ममहखयट् SUO MOTU HIGH COURT OF KERALA, vs STATE OF KERALA ुममयहममअवयभयानयाररतममदिकययाममहहममदिक in the case of those summons-cases instituted otherwise than upon a complaint, which do not qualify as petty offences, where the prosecution files a report stating unambiguously that despite its best efforts at locating the accused, it has not been successful in securing the presence of the accused before the Magistrate, the Magistrate concerned shall scrutinise the report submitted by the prosecution to satisfy himself/herself of the fact that reasonably sufficient sufficient steps have been taken by the prosecution to ensure the presence of the accused and that the costs of ensuring the appearance of such accused far exceed the maximum fine that is prescribed under the Statute for the offence concerned.

In the event of the Magistrate being satisfied of both of the aspects mentioned above, then it would be permissible for the Magistrate to record an order of stoppage of proceedings in accordance with Section 258 of the Cr.P.C Magistrate being satisfied of both of the aspects mentioned above. then it would be permissible for the Magistrate to record an order of stoppage of proceedings in accordance with Section 258 of the Cr.P.C उपरईकममपतयावलयलीमम/ चयालययााममसपाममुयाुलययममसट्ममसमबजन्नतममहहममतसयाममचयालययााममपरममअवयभयखकममिकयाममपतया अवहदिकतममाममहईाट्ममिकट्ममिकयारतममपतयावलयलीमम/ चयालययााममिकईममलयजमबतममरखायाममन्ययायईयचतममप्रतलीतममाहहहममहईतयाममहह मम अवततममउपरईकममतथययममएवहममपररजस्सयतययममिकट्ममआनयारममपरममउकममचयालययााममिककममिकयायरवयाहहममरईिककमम यातलीममहह पतयावलयलीममयायुयााखसयारममदयाजखलयममदततरममहई (रत्नम्ममश्रीवास्तववास)मममम ुख्यममन्ययाययिकममुज स्टट्ट्, बयागपत