Meta Pixel
CNR: MHLA020037032023
PENDING

Soni @ Sonali Gopinath Bawachkar vs

Case Number1333
Date of Filing2 Aug 2023
Case TypeSuccession - Application for Succession Certificate
Last Hearing2 Jan 2024
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Rajkumar Krushna Kure Other 3
  • Soni @ Sonali Gopinath Bawachkar
  • Rupali Govind Barule
  • Dipali Datta Baikre
Respondent
  • Nil

Case Summary

Rajkumar Krushna Kure Other 3 and Soni @ Sonali Gopinath Bawachkar filed Case No. 1333 in the District Court on 2 Aug 2023 against Nil. The case has undergone 9 hearings over 4 months. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (9)

  • 2JAN 2024
    Disposed

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗
  • 20DEC 2023
    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗
  • 13DEC 2023
    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗
  • 22NOV 2023
    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗
  • 8NOV 2023
    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗
  • 18OCT 2023
    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗
  • 4OCT 2023
    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗
  • 15SEP 2023
    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗
  • 3AUG 2023
    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Judge: 3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur

    View Order ↗

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

M.A.(S) No.1333/2023 Rajkumar Vs.

Nil CNR No.MHLA020037032023 ORDER BELOW EXH.1 The application is called on for hearing.

The applicants are absent.

Their advocate Shri.

Y.

D.

Jagtap is present.

He submitted that the applicants are not providing the necessary information for proceeding with the matter and hence, they submitted to dispose of the matter.

His statement is taken on record.

It shows that the applicants are not interested to proceed with the matter.

Thus, there is no option but to dismiss the application for want of prosecution.

Hence, the application is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.

Proceeding is closed.

Sd/- Place: Latur. ( P.

T.

Gotey ) Date : 02/01/2024.

3rd Jt.

Civil Judge, S.D., Latur.