Meta Pixel
CNR: GJVD020263012023
PENDING

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAKESH RAJUBHAI CHAUDHARI

Case Number18659
Date of Filing2 Aug 2023
Case TypeCC - CRIMINAL CASE
Last Hearing9 Sept 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Respondent
  • RAKESH RAJUBHAI CHAUDHARI

Case Summary

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT filed Case No. 18659 in the District Court on 2 Aug 2023 against RAKESH RAJUBHAI CHAUDHARI. The case has undergone 2 hearings over 1 month. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (2)

  • 9SEP 2023
    Disposed

    Judge: 7TH ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

    View Order ↗
  • 8AUG 2023
    PROCESS TO ACCUSED

    Judge: 7TH ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

    View Order ↗

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

GJVD020263012023 OMHNFZLPS[;PG\P!(&5)qZ_Z# GF SFD[ VF\Sv! ,UT C]SD vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv OZLIFNL ov zL ;ZSFZ lJZ]wW VFZM5Lov ZFS[X ZFH]EF.

RF{WZL vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv !P ;NZ SFD[ VFZM5L ;FD[ WL U]HZFT GXFA\WL VlWlGID v Z_!&GL SP &5 V[ V[ D]HAG]\ RFH"XL8 ZH] SZJFDF\ VFJTF4;Dg; SZTF4 VFHZMH VFZM5L CFHZ ZC[, K[P U]gCF AFAT[ VFZM5L 5MTFGL DZHL VG[ :J[rKFV[ ;NZ U]GM SA], SZJFG]\ H6FJ[ K[ VG[ T[ AFAT[ T[VMV[ 5MTFGL U]GF SA],FT 5]Z;L; VF SFD[ ZH] ZFB[, K[P H[YL VFZM5L :J[{rKLS SA],FT SZTF CMJFG]\ O,LT YFI K[P ZP GFDP DFGJ\T U]HZFT CF.SM8" wJFZF STATE OF GUJARAT vs.

NATWAR HARCHANDJI THAKOR, 2005 (1) GLR 709GF\ R]SFNFDF\ V[J] 5|:YFl5T SZ[, K[ S[4 The word "special" has to be understood in contradiction to word "general" or "ordinary".

It becomes apparent and unquestionable from the language employed in the proviso that the reasons to be recorded in writing in judgment for less than the minimum sentence, on the ground of presence of special and adequate reasons in the light of sentencing process must be special and adequate to the circumstances in a given case and peculiar to the accused in each case.

It is, therefore, very clear that the discretionary jurisdiction empowered in the trial Magistrates must be based on and in presence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be mentioned in the judgment of the Court for each case and each accused. (Para 42; See also Paras 35, 43 and 44) H[ 5|:YFl5T l;wWF\TG[ CF,GF\ S[;GL CSLST ;FY[ ,1FDF\ ,[JFDF\ VFJ[ TM4 CF,GF\ H[ VFZM5LqVM wJFZF SA],FT SZJFDF\ VFJ[ K[4 T[DGL ;FD[ SFINFDF\ 5|:YFl5T SZ[, ;HFGL HMUJF.

SZTF4 VMKL ;HF SZJL D]GF;LO H6FI K[P #P ;NZ S[;G]\ Z[S0" TYF OZLIFN 5[5;" wIFG[ ,[TF T[DH VFZM5LGL VFlY"S l:YTL TYF ;NZ U]GF V\U[ NIFGL DF\U6L HMTF4 VFZM5LG[ ;HF SZTL JBT[ pNFZ J,6 ZFBL ;]WFZJFGL TS VF5JFYL gIFIGM C[T] H/JFI T[D H6FT] CMI GLR[ D]HAGM C]SD SZJFDF\ VFJ[ K[P voo VF B ZL C] S D oov VF SFDGF\ VFZM5LG[ lS|DLG, 5|M;LhZ SM0 GL SP Z$!

D]HA Z$!

D]HA p5ZMST U]GFDF\ TS;LZJFG 9ZFJL4 NZ[S VFZM5LG[ ~FP!__qvsV\S[ Z]l5IF V[S;M 5]ZFfGM N\0 SZJFDF\ VFJ[ K[ VG[ SM8" p9TF ;]WLGL ;HFGM C]SD SZJFDF\ VFJ[ K[P HM VFZM5L N\0GL ZSD G EZ[ TM VFZM5LG[ lNG v !

GL ;FNL S[NGL ;HF EMUJJFGM C]SD SZJFDF\ VFJ[ K[P ;NZ SFD[ SAH[ SZJFDF\ VFJ[, lAGlS\DTL D]N'FDF,GM lGID VG];FZ GFX SZJMP VF C]SD VFHZMH TFov) DL4 DFC[ ;%8[dAZ4 ;G[vZ_Z# GF\ ZMH :5[શ્યલ ;L8L\UDF\ JF\RL ;\E/FJL DFZL ;CL SZLG[ HFC[Z SZJFDF\ આવ્યો.

TFP_)P_)PZ_Z# sV[,PVF.PEF8Lf J0F[NZFP SM0 G\PHLPH[P_!&5& s:5[શ્યલ ;L8L\Uf *DF\ HI]0LXLI, D[HL:8=[8 OPSP4 J0F[NZFP