Meta Pixel
CNR: GJRJ010069972023
PENDING

BALAJIBHAI POPATBHAI BHANDERI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Case Number532
Date of Filing3 Aug 2023
Case TypeCR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
Last Hearing14 Sept 2024
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • BALAJIBHAI POPATBHAI BHANDERI
Respondent
  • GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
  • SHIV SAGAR CREDIT CO.OPP.SOC.LTD (1) KIRTIBHAI LAXMIDAS PATEL

Case Summary

BALAJIBHAI POPATBHAI BHANDERI filed Case No. 532 in the District Court on 3 Aug 2023 against GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT and SHIV SAGAR CREDIT CO.OPP.SOC.LTD (1) KIRTIBHAI LAXMIDAS PATEL. The case has undergone 17 hearings over 1 year. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (17)

  • 14SEP 2024
    Disposed

    Judge: 2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 12SEP 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 11SEP 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 6SEP 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 2SEP 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 3AUG 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 31JUL 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 20JUL 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 5JUL 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 19JUN 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 3JUN 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 17MAY 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 29MAR 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 9FEB 2024
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 21DEC 2023
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 8NOV 2023
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗
  • 18AUG 2023
    PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

    Judge: 5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

    View Order ↗

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Criminal Appeal No.

532 of 2023 Page No.

1 GJRJ010069972023 Received on 03-08-2023 Registered on 03-08-2023 Decided on 14-09-2024 Duration Years Months Days 01 01 11 IN THE COURT OF 02nd ADDL.

SESSIONS JUDGE [ P.

J.

TAMAKUWALA ] AT RAJKOT.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.532 of 2023 Order Below Exh.20 APPELLANT/ACCUSED:- Balajibhai Popatbhai Bhanderi Address -Madhuvan Park-2, Avadhpark, Near Tulsipatra Apartment,Bapa sitaram Chok, Mavdi Main Road,Rajkot Versus RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT:- (1) State Of Gujarat (2) Kirtibhai Laxmidas Patel As a Officer Of Shri Shivsagar Credit Co.Op.Society Ltd.

Adult,Service, At : Real Prime Shop No.110-112, Bapa sitaram Chok,Mavdi Bypass Road,Rajkot Criminal Appeal No.

2 SUB: An Appeal against the Judgement passed by Ld.

9th A.C.J.M.,RAJKOT, in Criminal Case No.22953/2020 dated 05/07/2023.

Appearance :- =============================== Ld.Advocate(s) MR.

V.

Gohel for the appellant.

Ld.

Advocate(s) MR.

P.

Barot for the respondent no.2/ complainant. =============================== ~:: J U D G M E N T ::~ 1) Present appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 05/07/2023 which was passed by Ld.

9th A.C.J.M.

Court, RAJKOT, (hereinafter referred to as "Trial Court" in short) in Criminal Case No.

22953 of 2020 whereby the Ld.

Trial Court has convicted the appellant/accused u/s.

138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as "N.I.

Act" in short) and has ordered that the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for ONE YEAR and shall also pay the compensation of cheque amount to the complainant within ONE MONTH and in default shall undergo further simple imprisonment for FIFTEEN DAYS.

Hence, this appeal.

2) The brief facts of the case are as under:- 2.1.

The complainant advanced loan to the accused and for the repayment of above stated amount, the accused has issued cheque of his account.

The said cheque was deposited in the bank for clearing by the complainant which was Criminal Appeal No.

Appeal No.

3 returned with the endorsement of "Funds Insufficient" and so, for that complainant had issued notice to the accused within prescribed time limit duly served upon him though accused has not complied with the said notice and for that Criminal case no.22953/2020 was filed against the accused U/s.

138 of the N.I.

Act.

3) On behalf of the respondent Ld. advocate has filed the vakalatnama which is taken on record vide Exh.18.

4) I have heard learned advocates of both sides and gone through the judgment and papers on record.

5) During the course of hearing the Ld. advocate for the appellant has submitted pursis vide Exh-19 which is signed by both the parties and has declared that as complainant has been paid the amount which is due from the appellant and so does not want to proceed with the appeal.

Therefore accused has preferred an application vide Exh.20 for setting aside the judgment of the Ld.

Trial Court.

6) This Court has recorded compromise pursis between the parties which is produced on record vide Exh.19 and vide Exh-20 the application is given to set aside the conviction.

On the day of filing of the compromise pursis, both the parties were examined by this court for the purpose of satisfaction that the compromise between the parties has been entered without any coercion, any Criminal Appeal No.

4 kind of influence and pressure.

The complainant is present before the court along with his advocate and stated that he has received the cheque amount and has no objection if the offence is compounded in favour of the appellant.

In the circumstances there is no need to passed any order for the same.

7) It was held by the Apex Court in Damodar S Prabhu v.

Sayed Babalal H AIR 2010 Supreme Court 1907, that the offence under section 138 is compoundable in view of section 147. ction 147.

It is well settled that it is in the interest of the State there should be an end of litigation and compromise between the parties would generate brotherhood in the society.

Thus, the offence is hereby compounded and in the larger interest of justice the following final order is passed: ~~:: O R D E R ::~~ 1) The order Criminal Case No.22953 of 2020 dated 05/07/2023 of Ld.

Court, RAJKOT convicting the present appellant which is under challenge is hereby set aside and offence is compounded.

2) The appellant is hereby acquitted in Criminal Case No.22953 of 2020.

3) The appellant to furnish bail bond of Rs.10,000/- as per the provision of Section 437(A) of the Cr.

P.C.

5 4) The present matter be consigned in the record room as per rule, simultaneously, the R. & P., if any, be sent back along with copy of this order to the Ld.

Court, RAJKOT.

Pronounced in the open Court today on 14th day of September, 2024.

Date: 14/09/2024 [P.J.Tamakuwala] Place: Rajkot.

02nd Additional Sessions Judge, Lok-Adalat Rajkot. [UIC Code No.GJ00581]