JAYDIPSINH NATVARSINH CHAUHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT
Party Details
- JAYDIPSINH NATVARSINH CHAUHAN
- STATE OF GUJARAT
Case Summary
JAYDIPSINH NATVARSINH CHAUHAN filed Case No. 425 in the District Court on 3 Aug 2023 against STATE OF GUJARAT. The case has undergone 2 hearings over 2 days. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (2)
- 7AUG 2023DisposedView Order ↗
Judge: 2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
- 5AUG 2023HEARINGView Order ↗
Judge: 2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Orders (1)
- 7AUG 2023JUDEGEMENTView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
1 Criminal Misc.
Application No.425 of 2022 GJPM170017582023 IN THE COURT OF 2ND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE PANCHMAHALS AT HALOL.
Criminal Misc.
Application No.425 of 2022 Applicant : : Jaydipsinh @ Fofo Natvarsinh Chauhan Age : 33 years, Occupation: at present nothing at : Bedhia, Gulabsinhnimuvadi, TaKalol, DiPanchmahals.
At present : in judicial custody Vs.
Opponent : : The State of Gujarat.
Subject: Application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for regular bail.
APPEARANCE: Ld.
Advocate for the Applicant. : Mr.
V.
N.
Jadav.
Ld.
A.P.P. for the State. : Mr.
R.
D.
Shukla. :: J U D G M E N T :: 1.
The applicant is in judicial custody in connection with Vejalpur Police Station vide FIR No.11207076230009/2023 for offences punishable u/s 302, 504, 506(2), 326 & 120(B) of the IPC and u/s 135 of the G.
P.
Act.
He has sought interim bail for 15 days from 2 Criminal Misc.
Application No.425 of 2022 5/8/23 to 20/8/23 u/s 439 of the Cr.PC and according to him this application is on humanitarian ground not on merits of the case.
2.
Advocate for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent but falsely implicated in this case, that he is in judicial custody for last 7 months, that he has old aged parents having debilities, that on 3/10/22 he got divorce from his wife and his little daughter is with his parents, that in near future his presence would be required for his daughter’s admission in school and therefore he requires temporary bail for 15 days from 5/8/23 to 20/8/23.
Hence considering the facts, he may be enlarged on interim bail for the said period and he shall abide by all conditions of bail those may be imposed.
3.
APP has opposed the bail application stating that there is accusation of heinous crime against the applicant, this interim bail application may be rejected.
4.
Having regard to the facts of this case, in order to decide this regular interim bail application u/s 439 of the Cr.P.C. for the above stated 3 Criminal Misc.
Application No. cation No.425 of 2022 period, established principles as to bail have been taken into consideration.
The Court having power u/s 439 of the Cr.PC for granting regular bail, also possess power to entertain application of interim bail.
Provided that the presence of accused outside the judicial custody is inevitable.
The reasons given in application do not show any inevitability.
The accusation against the applicant are serious in nature and Ld.
APP has started producing evidences so, considering the stage of case and also considering possibility of accused jumping the bail, I am not inclined to grant this interim bail application hence, this regular interim bail application stands rejected.
Pronounced in open Court today, this 7th day of August, 2023.
Date : 07/08/2023. [ Harsh Balkrishna Trivedi ] Place : Halol.
2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Halol.
Joshi [UIC No.
GJ00576]