Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

Raj Kumar vs Punjab State Power Corporation Limited

Case NumberCC/352/2018
Date of Filing27 Aug 2018
Case TypeConsumer Case(CC)
Last Hearing26 Oct 2021
State--
City--
Year of Filing2018

Party Details

Respondent
  • S.D.O/Asstt. Executve Engineer
  • PSPCL

Case Summary

Raj Kumar vs Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (Case No. CC/352/2018) is listed in the Consumer Court, filed on 27 Aug 2018. The case has undergone 42 hearings over 3 years and 1 month. The case is currently pending. 42 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (42)

  • 26OCT 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: DISPOSED OFF

  • 31AUG 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 17AUG 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 3AUG 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 1MAR 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 1FEB 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 25JAN 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 14AUG 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 25JUN 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 20MAR 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 12MAR 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 14FEB 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 24JAN 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 16JAN 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 5DEC 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 14NOV 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 18OCT 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 26SEP 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 17SEP 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 28AUG 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: EVIDENCE

  • 5AUG 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: EVIDENCE

  • 12JUL 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 10JUL 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 28JUN 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 24JUN 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 10JUN 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 20MAY 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 14MAY 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 2MAY 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 11APR 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 19MAR 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CONSIDERATION

  • 28FEB 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 20FEB 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 8FEB 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 25JAN 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 11JAN 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 21DEC 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 30NOV 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 16NOV 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 26OCT 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 11OCT 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: REPLY

  • 6SEP 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: ISSUE NOTICE

Orders (42)

  • 26OCT 2021
    judgement

    Order No: N/A

  • 31AUG 2021
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 17AUG 2021
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 3AUG 2021
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 1MAR 2021
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 1FEB 2021
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 25JAN 2021
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 14AUG 2020
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 25JUN 2020
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 20MAR 2020
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 12MAR 2020
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 14FEB 2020
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 24JAN 2020
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 16JAN 2020
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 5DEC 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 14NOV 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 18OCT 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 26SEP 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 17SEP 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 28AUG 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 5AUG 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 12JUL 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 10JUL 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 28JUN 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 24JUN 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 10JUN 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 20MAY 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 14MAY 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 2MAY 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 11APR 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 19MAR 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 28FEB 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 20FEB 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 8FEB 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 25JAN 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 11JAN 2019
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 21DEC 2018
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 30NOV 2018
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 16NOV 2018
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 26OCT 2018
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 11OCT 2018
    order

    Order No: N/A

  • 6SEP 2018
    order

    Order No: N/A

Judgement Details

Daily Order DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR JUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR Complaint Case No.

CC/352/2018 Raj Kumar Vs.

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and Others BEFORE: HON'BLE MR.

Sant Prakash Sood PRESIDENT Vinod Kumar Gulati MEMBER Mrs.

Sarita Garg MEMBER PRESENT: Dated : 26 Oct 2021 Order Shri Parvesh Kumar Khera, Adv. for complainant.

Shri Mohit Verma, Adv. for OPs.

Before proceedings further it was brought to the notice of the Commission that sole legal heir who was earlier impleaded as legal heir of his father Shri Raj Kumar original complainant, has also died due to covid.

His widow Smt.

Renu Goyal has moved an application for impleading herself alongwith her minor children being legal heirs of Harsh Goyal.

Alongwith this application death certificate of Harsh Goyal was also submitted and power of attorney executed by applicant has also been placed on record by Shri Parvesh Khera Advocate.

This development was not objected by learned counsel for the OPs Shri Mohit Verma, Advocate.

In view of this development, Smt.

Renu Goyal alongwith her minor children are impleaded as legal heirs of Harsh Goyal.

During further proceedings present legal heirs brought it to the notice of the Commission that on account of successive deaths in her family and on account of object poverty they are not in a position to clear the arrears as demanded by the OPs.

Therefore a request to permit them to deposit the outstanding amount i.e.

Rs.24728/- by way of instalments was made.

This development was brought to the notice of Mr.

Mohit Verma Advocate who after getting in touch with concerned department authorities acceded the proposal.

However being sympathetic to the whole situation present legal heirs of the complainant are permitted to deposit outstanding amount by way of instalments Rs.5000/- every fortnightly. rtnightly.

It is also made clear to the present legal heirs of the complainant that in case there will be any default in this regard then of course they will forfeit the right of this concession and then the OPs will be well in their right to demand the remaining amount in one go.

Needless to say over and above the above said instalment of Rs.5000/- the present LRs will also bear the current energy charges whenever being issued to them bi-monthly.

Both the parties got recorded their separate statements and as LRs of original complainant do not wish to continue so in view of this the present complaint is disposed of accordingly.

Needless to say both the parties shall be bound by their statements.File be consigned to records in due course. [HON'BLE MR.

Sant Prakash Sood] PRESIDENT [ Vinod Kumar Gulati] MEMBER [ Mrs.

Sarita Garg] MEMBER