Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

VINOD @ SAI D. GHOGALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case NumberCrl.A. No. 001724 / 2017
Date of Filing21 Jul 2017
Case Type--
Last Hearing28 Aug 2017
StateDelhi
CityDelhi
Year of Filing2017

Party Details

Petitioner
  • VINOD @ SAI D. GHOGALE
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY

Case Summary

VINOD @ SAI D. GHOGALE filed Case No. Crl.A. No. 001724 / 2017 in the Supreme Court of India on 21 Jul 2017 against THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 28 Aug 2017. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 28AUG 2017
    FRESH

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

    Notice Returnable [D:0,W:4,M:0]

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.

1724 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NOS.

6660 OF 2017] VINOD @ SAI D.

GHOGALE Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.

1.

Leave granted.

2.

It is informed that out of ten years of sentence, the appellant has served more than seven years in jail.

It is also informed that the co-accused has been released on bail.

3.

While issuing notice on 28.08.2017, this Court passed the following order :- “Delay condoned.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Accused No.

2, who is exactly similarly placed as the petitioner, has been granted bail, whereas the petitioner has been denied bail.

In view of the above submission, issue notice, returnable in four weeks.” 4.

The learned counsel for the State submits that the High Court is taking steps to expedite the hearing, but the fact remains is that, the appellant Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date: 2017.10.06 15:46:27 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified 2 is similarly placed as the co-accused.

5.

Having already served more than seven years, out of ten years of sentence, we are of the view that the appellant also needs to be enlarged on bail, if not required to be detained in any other case.

6.

Therefore, the appellant is enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two solvent sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

7.

In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of. .......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ R.

BANUMATHI ] New Delhi; October 03, 2017.

3 ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.5 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).

6660/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-03-2017 in CRLA No. n CRLA No.

91/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay) VINOD @ SAI D.

GHOGALE Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.75334/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP and IA No.75335/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.75336/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS) Date : 03-10-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS.

JUSTICE R.

BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr.

Sushil Karanjkar, Adv.

Mr.

K.

N.

Rai, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.

Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted.

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment.

Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file)