RANJIT GURUNATH CHATTRE vs BHIWANDI NIZAMPURA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Case NumberC.A. No. 008916 - 008919 / 2019

Date of Filing28 Jun 2018

Case Type2904-Labour and Industrial Laws : Labour welfare legislations e.g. Factories Act, trade unions and other labour matters

Last Hearing24 Mar 2022

Court⚖️ Supreme Court of India ↗

StateDelhi

CityDelhi

Year of Filing2018

Petitioner

RANJIT GURUNATH CHATTRE
VIJAYKRISHNA JOSHI
MAHENDRA ANANTA NIKAM
SUNIL NANDKUMAR PATHARE
SHEKHAR MANOHAR YADAV
BHARATIYA KAMGAR KARMACHARI MAHASANGH
MURLIDHAR TATYA PATIL
ANIL GANGARAM JADHAV
SUBHASH RAMCHANDRA PATIL
SAHEBRAO DHAGO CHAUDHARI
MAHENDRA BHALCHANDRA PATIL
ARUN SHANKAR KADAM
JAGANNATH BABLYA PAWAR
RAJU ANANTA GHADGE
SHREERAM NAGNATH AMRUTWAR
CHANDRAKANT SHANKAR BHOIR
KISHOR SHIVRAM KENE
AAKASH YADURAJ PATIL
MANSI MAHENDRA NIKAM
SANDHYA SURESH TALOKAR
GAUTAM NAMDEO GAIKWAD
BHAGIRATH PANDHARINATH PATIL
MANISHA VADUDEO PUNYARTHI
MANSI MANISH DUGADE
KISAN POSHETTY PULLE
SUMEDH TANAJI MORE
BEENA BAPURAM SAPTE
KIRAN VITHHAL BHOIR
SHARAD SURESH BHAWAR
NARENDRA SHANKAR JADHAV
VIKAS JEEVAN SONAWANE
ATISH SAKHARAM GAIKWAD
NARESH ASHOK GAIKWAD
AMOL BALARAM GAIKWAD
MAHENDRA SITARAM NIKAM
RAJENDRA NIRANJAN GAIKWAD
AADESH DASHRATH JADHAV
SANJAY RAMCHANDRA MORE
ATISH RAJENDRA JADHAV
AJAY RAMCHANDRA JADHAV
FOROJ RASHID SHAIKH
SUNITA KUNDAS JADHAV
SANGEETA RAVINDRA GAIKWAD
SANJAY JAGANNATH TAYADE

Respondent

BHIWANDI NIZAMPURA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
THE COMMISSIONER BHIWANDI NIZAMPURA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
VISHWAS ANANTA MHATRE
KAMLAKAR DASHRATH PATIL
CHANDRAKANT NAMDEV PATIL
PRAMOD GORANKHNATH JADHAV
SHIRISH BHASKAR TARE
PANDIT GATLYA BHOIR
PRAMOD RAMDAS JADHAV
DIPAK WAMAN MORE
PRAFUL SURYAKANT TAMBE
VASANT RAGHO PATIL
SUJIT BHASKAR BHOIR
SMITA GUNAJI GHADGE
MILIND KISAN PAWAR

RANJIT GURUNATH CHATTRE and VIJAYKRISHNA JOSHI filed Case No. C.A. No. 008916 - 008919 / 2019 in the Supreme Court of India on 28 Jun 2018 against BHIWANDI NIZAMPURA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and THE COMMISSIONER BHIWANDI NIZAMPURA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 14 orders have been issued in this matter.