Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010001972024
PENDING

The Branch Manager, Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Ltd. vs Dal Bahadur Thapa and Ors.

Case NumberMAC App. /10/2025
Date of Filing22 Apr 2025
Case TypeMotor Accident Appeals
Last Hearing6 Apr 2026
StateSikkim
CityGangtok
Year of Filing2025

Party Details

Petitioner
  • The Branch Manager
  • Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Ltd.
Respondent
  • Dal Bahadur Thapa and Ors.
  • Tara Devi Thapa
  • Rajen Thapa
  • Bindiya Thapa
  • Sabin Thapa
  • Dilip Kumar Goyal
  • Krishna Pradhan

Case Summary

The Branch Manager and Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Ltd. filed Case No. MAC App. /10/2025 in the Sikkim High Court on 22 Apr 2025 against Dal Bahadur Thapa and Ors. and Tara Devi Thapa. The case has undergone 2 hearings over 4 months. The case is currently pending. 12 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (2)

  • 6APR 2026
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 20NOV 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

Orders (12)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Court No.2 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings I.A.

No.02 of 2025 in MAC App./135/2024 (Filing No.) THE BRANCH MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM MS APPLICANT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

VERSUS DAL BAHADUR THAPA AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Date: 16.04.2025 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS.

JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Applicant Mr.

Rahul Rathi, Advocate.

For Respondents R-1, R-3 to R-5 Mr.

Bhim Shankar Pradhan, Advocate.

R-2 None present.

R-6 None present.

R-7 None present.

ORDER Heard on I.A.

No.02 of 2025 which is an application filed on behalf of legal representative of the deceased Respondent No.2 seeking to substitute Respondent No.2.

It is submitted in the said application that the deceased Respondent No.2 has left the following legal heirs, who are already Respondents in the instant MAC App.135/2024/(Filing No.) viz.; Dal Bahadur Thapa already arrayed as Respondent No.1; Rajen Thapa arrayed as Respondent No.3; Bindiya Thapa arrayed as Respondent No.4; and Sabin Thapa arrayed as Respondent No.5.

In view of the fact that, Respondent No.2 has no other legal heirs and successors, as stated in I.A.

No.02 of 2025, duly supported by an Affidavit, Learned Counsel for the Applicant has no objection to the prayer for substitution.

The Respondents named hereinabove, will be representing the deceased Respondent No.2.

Registry to take necessary steps.

I.A.

No.02 of 2025 stands disposed of.

Judge 16.04.2025 ds/sdl