Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010000452020
DISPOSED

Mr. Mohan Singh Rai vs State of Sikkim and Ors.

Case NumberWP(C) /27/2020
Date of Filing28 Aug 2020
Case TypeWrit Petition Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution
Last Hearing24 Feb 2021
State--
City--
Year of Filing2020

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Mr. Mohan Singh Rai
  • Gopal Darjee
  • Sachita Nanda Darjee
  • Narayan Rai
  • Kumar Chettri
Respondent
  • State of Sikkim and Ors.
  • Divisional Forest Office (Territorial)
  • Director
  • Panchayat Department
  • Sabhapati Panchayat
  • Panchayat Member (Ward No. 1)
  • Gopikrishna Mangar
  • Tender Committee
  • through DFO (Territorial)
  • Man Bahadur Chettri
  • Shanti Dhakal
  • Ganga Prasad Sharma
  • Karnay Rai

Case Summary

Mr. Mohan Singh Rai and Gopal Darjee filed Case No. WP(C) /27/2020 in the Sikkim High Court on 28 Aug 2020 against State of Sikkim and Ors. and Divisional Forest Office (Territorial). The case has undergone 4 hearings over 4 months. The case was disposed of on 24 Feb 2021. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (4)

  • 24FEB 2021
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 3DEC 2020
    Admission

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 21OCT 2020
    Admission

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 30SEP 2020
    Admission

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai & Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai & Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai & Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

Orders (6)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

WP (C) No.

27/2020 MR.

MOHAN SINGH RAI PETITIONER (S) VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.

RESPONDENT (S) For petitioner : Mr.

A.

Moulik, Sr.

Advocate.

Mr.

Ranjit Prasad, Advocate.

For respondents no.

1, : Dr.

Doma T.

Bhutia, Addl.

Advocate General. to 5 & 7 Mr.

S.

K.

Chettri, Govt.

6 : Mr.

Uma Shankar Sarda, Advocate.

9 : Mr.

Ganesh Man Chettri, Advocate. & 10 Date: 24/02/2021 CORAM : HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI, CJ. … Heard on I.A.

No.

2 of 2021, which is an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.

Counsel representing the respondents having no objection in view of the prayer made, I.A.

2 of 2021 is allowed.

In terms of allowing I.A.

2 of 2021 this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

The interim order, if any, seized to its effect in view of withdrawal of the writ petition.

The parties are at liberty to file a fresh petition, if fresh cause of action arises.

Chief Justice jk/avi