Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010000682015
DISPOSED

Mr. Nar Bahadur Gurung vs State Of Sikkim and Ors.

Case NumberWP(C) /57/2015
Date of Filing18 Sept 2015
Case TypeWrit Petition Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution
Last Hearing30 Sept 2020
State--
City--
Year of Filing2015

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Mr. Nar Bahadur Gurung
Respondent
  • State Of Sikkim and Ors.

Case Summary

Mr. Nar Bahadur Gurung filed Case No. WP(C) /57/2015 in the Sikkim High Court on 18 Sept 2015 against State Of Sikkim and Ors.. The case has undergone 40 hearings over 4 years and 6 months. The case was disposed of on 30 Sept 2020. 41 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (40)

  • 30SEP 2020
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 23SEP 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 18AUG 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 15JUL 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 10JUN 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 22FEB 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 25NOV 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 25SEP 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 16JUL 2019
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 15MAY 2019
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 24APR 2019
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 14MAR 2019
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 4DEC 2018
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 13NOV 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 10OCT 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 30AUG 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 7AUG 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 23JUL 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 3JUL 2018
    For Being Mentioned

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 7JUN 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 2MAY 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 10APR 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 27MAR 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 1DEC 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 27OCT 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 30AUG 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 19JUN 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 18MAY 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 6APR 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 20FEB 2017
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 30NOV 2016
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 10NOV 2016
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 5OCT 2016
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 12SEP 2016
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 8SEP 2016
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 11AUG 2016
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 1JUN 2016
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 25APR 2016
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 11MAR 2016
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 4MAR 2016
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Orders (41)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing W.P. (C) No.57 of 2015 NAR BAHADUR GURUNG …PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS. …RESPONDENTS Date: 30.09.2020 CORAM: HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE … By filing I.A.

No.16/2020, the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition.

Mr.

Rahul Rathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition because of personal reasons and therefore, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.

Ms.

Y.

W.

Rinchen, learned State Counsel appearing for respondent no.1, Mr.

J.

B.

Pradhan, learned Senior Counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3, Mr.

Yozan Rai, learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos.4 to 6; Mr.

A.

K.

Moulik, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent nos.8, 11 to 14, 16, 20, 28, 31 to 34, 36 to 40, 42 to 76, 78, 81 to 86, 89, 92, 93, 97, 98 &100 to 110; Mr.

Tashi Norbu Basi, learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing for respondent nos.9, 10, 17 to 19, 22 to 24, 26, 27, 29, 90, 95 & 96 and Mr.

Jorgay Namka, learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing for respondent nos.5, 21, 35, 77 & 79 have no objection.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed on withdrawal.

I.A.

No.16/2020 stands disposed of in terms of the above.

Pending IAs, if any, will also stand disposed of accordingly.

Chief Justice pm/ ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI Digitally signed by ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI Date: 2020.09.30 14:37:26 +05'30'