Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010000452018
DISPOSED

Jiwan Kumar Pradhan vs Kedarnath Pradhan and Another

Case NumberWP(C) /10/2018
Date of Filing11 Apr 2018
Case TypeWrit Petition Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution
Last Hearing13 Mar 2020
State--
City--
Year of Filing2018

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Jiwan Kumar Pradhan
Respondent
  • Kedarnath Pradhan and Another

Case Summary

Jiwan Kumar Pradhan filed Case No. WP(C) /10/2018 in the Sikkim High Court on 11 Apr 2018 against Kedarnath Pradhan and Another. The case has undergone 12 hearings over 1 year and 10 months. The case was disposed of on 13 Mar 2020. 14 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (12)

  • 13MAR 2020
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 29FEB 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 23SEP 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 5AUG 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 30MAY 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 1APR 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 28FEB 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 14NOV 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 27SEP 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 20JUL 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 25JUN 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 9MAY 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

Orders (14)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

CJ’s Court High Court of Sikkim Record of Proceedings 5 WP(C) No.10 of 2018 JIWAN KUMAR PRADHAN …PETITIONER VERSUS KEDARNATH PRADHAN AND ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS Date : 13-03-2020 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE O R D E R Heard Mr.

Zangpo Sherpa, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.

T.R Barfungpa, learned Counsel for respondent no.1.

Also heard Ms.

Mukun Dolma Tamang, learned Assistant Government Advocate for respondent no.2.

I.A No.06 of 2020 was filed by the respondent no.1 stating that Title Suit No.16 of 2015, filed by the petitioner, was dismissed by the learned District Judge, Special Division-I, Gangtok by Judgment dated 27.03.2018.

He submits that challenge in the Writ Petition was, amongst others, to an order releasing land acquisition compensation amount to the respondent no.1, and the claim made by the petitioner in Title Suit No.16 of 2015 that the land acquired was part of the ancestral property having been negated, nothing survives for consideration and the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous.

Mr.

Sherpa also submits that in view of the developments as indicated in the I.A No.06 of 2020, the Writ Petition has been rendered infructous.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

I.A is also disposed of.

Chief Justice avi