K. N. Khatiwara and another vs State of Sikkim and Others
Party Details
- K. N. Khatiwara and another
- State of Sikkim and Others
- Secretary
- Land Revenue and Disaster Management Department
- The District Collector
- East District
- Member Secretary
- State Pollution Control Board
- M/s. Madhya Bharat Power Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
Case Summary
K. N. Khatiwara and another filed Case No. WP(C) /23/2018 in the Sikkim High Court on 6 Jun 2018 against State of Sikkim and Others and Secretary. The case has undergone 25 hearings over 3 years and 7 months. The case was disposed of on 22 Mar 2022. 27 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (25)
- 22MAR 2022Disposal
Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai
- 30NOV 2021Hearing
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan
- 25SEP 2021Hearing
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan
Orders (27)
- 22MAR 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 27
- 30NOV 2021orderView Order ↗
Order No: 26
- 25SEP 2021orderView Order ↗
Order No: 25
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
Court No.2 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings W.P.(C) No.23 of 2018 K.N.
KHATIWARA & ANOTHER PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.
RESPONDENTS Date: 22.03.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS.
JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioners Mr.
Jushan Lepcha, Advocate on behalf of Mr.
Zangpo Sherpa, Advocate.
For Respondents R-1 to R-4 R-5 Mr.
Sudesh Joshi, Additional Advocate General.
Mr.
Yadev Sharma, Government Advocate.
A.
Moulik, Senior Advocate.
Ms.
K.D.
Bhutia, Advocate.
Ranjit Prasad, Advocate.
O R D E R Learned Senior Counsel for Respondent No.5 submits that he is agreeable to an assessment to be made by the concerned authority with regard to the compensation claimed by the Petitioners.
Learned Additional Advocate General for Respondents No.1 to 4 undertakes to take necessary steps in this regard to compute the assessment in tandem with the concerned District Authority.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioners has no objection to the submissions put forth by Learned Senior Counsel for Respondent No.5 and Learned Additional Advocate General for Respondents No.1 to 4.
Considered.
In view of the submissions put forth by Learned Counsel for the parties, nothing further remains for adjudication.
W.P.(C) No.23 of 2018 stands disposed of accordingly.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Judge 22.03.2022 ml