Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010000602016
DISPOSED

Pratap Singh Tamang vs State Legislative Assembly Secretariat, slas and Anr.

Case NumberWP(C) /55/2016
Date of Filing14 Nov 2016
Case TypeWrit Petition Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution
Last Hearing9 Dec 2019
State--
City--
Year of Filing2016

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Pratap Singh Tamang
Respondent
  • State Legislative Assembly Secretariat
  • slas and Anr.

Case Summary

Pratap Singh Tamang filed Case No. WP(C) /55/2016 in the Sikkim High Court on 14 Nov 2016 against State Legislative Assembly Secretariat and slas and Anr.. The case has undergone 21 hearings over 2 years and 8 months. The case was disposed of on 9 Dec 2019. 23 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (21)

  • 9DEC 2019
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 3DEC 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 25OCT 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 23SEP 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 27AUG 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 24JUL 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 6JUL 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 7MAY 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 26MAR 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 26NOV 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 27SEP 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 29JUN 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

  • 17APR 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 20FEB 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 25OCT 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 12SEP 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 31AUG 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 6JUL 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 17MAY 2017
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 11APR 2017
    Admission

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

  • 14MAR 2017
    Admission

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai

Orders (23)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Court No.3 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings W.P.(C) No.

55/2016 PRATAP SINGH TAMANG PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT, RESPONDENT (S) SLAS & ANR.

Date: 09/12/2019 CORAM : HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.

For Petitioner (s) : Ms.

Gita Bista and Ms.

Monika Rai, Advocates.

For Respondent No.1.

For Respondent No.2 : : Mr.

D.

K.

Siwakoti, Advocate.

Mr.

A.

Moulik, Senior Advocate with Ms.

Bhutia and Mr.

Ranjeet Prasad, Advocates. … 1.

A writ petition was filed by the petitioner before this Court for a direction upon the respondent No.1 to consider his case for promotion to the post of Under Secretary and thereafter to the post of Deputy Secretary prior to the respondent No.2 and to maintain his seniority.

A consequential prayer for arrears and other financial benefits were also sought for.

2.

Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, the respondents entered appearance.

During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent No.1 sent a communication to the petitioner informing the petitioner that pursuant to the application dated 02.07.2019, the Court No.3 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings Speaker of the Sikkim Legislative Assembly had consented to review his case.

3.

A report was filed by the respondent No.1 on 27.11.2019 annexing four Office Orders.

4.

Office Order No.937/ADMN/SLAS dated 08.11.2019 records that the Speaker, Sikkim Legislative Assembly is pleased to accept the report of the “One Man Grievance Redressal Ad-hoc Committee” constituted vide Order No.37/ADMN/SLAS, dated 02.08.2019 under the Chairmanship of Shri D.

Gazmer, IAS(Retd.) / Ex-Chief Information Commissioner.

5.

The second Office Order No.938/ADMN/SLAS dated 08.11.2019 records that in pursuance to Office Order No.

937/ADMN/SLAS, dated 08.11.2019 and in partial modification of previous O.

O.

No.

240/2009-2010/SLAS/ADMN/401, dated 25.03.2010, the Inter-Se- Seniority of Shri P.

S.

Tamang is hereby restored at serial No. serial No.1 preceding Shri Megraj Gurung.

6.

The third Office Order No.

940/ADMN/SLASS dated 08.11.2019 records that in partial modification to the previous office order No.15/707/99-00/SLAS/ADMN, dated 09.03.1999 and O.

242/SLAS/ADMN/2011-2012/513, dated 14.09.2011, Shri P.

Tamang is deemed to have been promoted to the following post as under:- Court No.3 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings Sl.No.

PROMOTED TO THE POST PAY SCALE W.E.F REMARKS 01.

Accountant 4300-125-6800 11/02/1999 Notional 02.

Under Secretary PB-II 9300-34800+G.P 5000/- 24/03/2010 Notional 7.

The final Office Order No.942/ADMN/SLASS dated 08.11.2019 records that the Speaker is pleased to promote Shri P.

Tamang, Under Secretary to the post of Deputy Secretary in Level-17 of the Pay Matrix in the Sikkim Legislative Assembly Secretariat and further he is deemed to have been promoted to the above mentioned post with effect from 02.09.2016.

8.

In view of the aforesaid Office Orders, the petitioner submits that his grievance have been met and therefore seeks to withdraw the present writ petition.

The respondent No.1 does not have any objection.

Moulik learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 however, submits that his client is aggrieved by the said office orders.

The office orders so passed by the respondent No.1 may be a cause of action for respondent No.2, however, the Office Orders having been passed in favour of the petitioner nothing survives in the present writ petition.

The petitioner is, therefore, permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

9.

Needless to say the respondent No.2 is at liberty to choose his legal course of action as he is advised.

Judge 09.12.2019 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sid/