Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010000202018
DISPOSED

vs

Case NumberWP(PIL) /3/2018
Date of Filing8 Mar 2018
Case TypeWrit Petition Pil
Last Hearing3 Apr 2019
State--
City--
Year of Filing2018

Party Details

Petitioner
  • In Re - Installation of CCTV Cameras in Courts and Tribunals
Respondent
  • x

Case Summary

In Re - Installation of CCTV Cameras in Courts and Tribunals filed Case No. WP(PIL) /3/2018 in the Sikkim High Court on 8 Mar 2018 against x. The case has undergone 12 hearings over 11 months. The case was disposed of on 3 Apr 2019. 14 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (12)

  • 3APR 2019
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan & Hon'ble The Chief Justice Vijai Kumar Bist

  • 5DEC 2018
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan & Hon'ble The Chief Justice Vijai Kumar Bist

  • 27NOV 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan & Hon'ble The Chief Justice Vijai Kumar Bist

  • 15NOV 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai & Hon'ble The Chief Justice Vijai Kumar Bist

  • 12SEP 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai & Hon'ble The Chief Justice Vijai Kumar Bist

  • 6SEP 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 4SEP 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 31JUL 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 28JUN 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 18JUN 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai & Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 18MAY 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai & Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 17APR 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan & Hon'ble The Chief Justice Vijai Kumar Bist

Orders (14)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

W.P. (PIL) No.

03/2018 IN RE – INSTALLATION OF CCTV CAMERAS IN COURTS AND TRIBUNALS Date: 03/04/2019 CORAM : HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE VIJAI KUMAR BIST, CJ.

HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.

For Petitioner (s) : Mr.

N.

Rai, Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae and Ms.

Tashi Doma Sherpa, Advocate as Amicus Curiae.

For Respondent (s) : Mr.

J.B.

Pradhan, Addl.

Advocate General, Mr.

Karma Thinlay, Sr.

Govt.

Advocate with Mr.

Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia and Mr.

Thupden Youngda, Govt.

Advocates, Mr.

S.K.

Chettri and Ms.

Pollin Rai, Asst.

Advocates.

For Lok Ayukta, Sikkim : Mr.

D.K.

Siwakoti, Advocate. … Chief Justice Pursuant to the directions made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Pradyuman Bisht vs.

Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition (s) (Criminal) No(s).

99/2015), this Court has taken up the matter as Suo Moto petition dealing with the installation of CCTV cameras in court rooms and tribunals.

Certain directions were issued by this Court from time to time.

2.

As per the learned Amicus Curiae, the following 14 quasi judicial authorities are functioning in the State: 1.

Secretary, Human Rights Commission 2.

Secretary, Sikkim Lokayukta 3.

Secretary, Sikkim Information Commission 4.

Secretary, Sikkim Commission for Backward Classes 5.

Secretary, Police Accountability Commission 6.

Office of District Collector, East 7.

Office of District Collector, West 8.

Office of District Collector, North 9.

Office of District Collector, South 10.

Member Secretary, State Commission for Protection of Child Rights.

11.

Member Secretary, Sikkim Women’s Commission 12.

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 13.

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum 14.

State Electricity Regulatory Commission 3.

We have been informed by the learned Additional Advocate General that CCTV cameras have been installed in the office of all the above quasi judicial authorities.

4.

Learned Amicus Curiae has filed a report dated 01.4. ated 01.4.2019, in which it is stated that she has visited the offices of Sub-Divisional Magistrates of all the Districts and found that in some offices of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, CCTV cameras have not been installed where cases are being conducted.

At this, learned Additional Advocate General submits that CCTV cameras in the office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrates, where court proceedings are being conducted, shall be installed within six months.

5.

It has also been pointed out by the learned Additional Advocate General that CCTV cameras have been installed in all the 27 Child Care Institutions in Sikkim.

A Compliance Report dated 01.04.2019 has also been filed by the respondent no.1, to that effect.

6.

Considering the above facts, we are of the view that the present writ petition deserves to be closed and the same is closed.

Judge Chief Justice 03.04.2019 03.04.2019 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No jk/bp/avi