Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010000412018
DISPOSED

Puran Alley vs State Of Sikkim and others

Case NumberWP(PIL) /4/2018
Date of Filing6 Apr 2018
Case TypeWrit Petition Pil
Last Hearing25 Apr 2018
State--
City--
Year of Filing2018

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Puran Alley
Respondent
  • State Of Sikkim and others
  • Secretary
  • Building and Housing Department
  • Govt. of Sikkim
  • Chief Engineer
  • Building and Housing Department
  • Govt. of Sikkim
  • Sonam Topden Bhutia

Case Summary

Puran Alley filed Case No. WP(PIL) /4/2018 in the Sikkim High Court on 6 Apr 2018 against State Of Sikkim and others and Secretary. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 25 Apr 2018. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 25APR 2018
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai & Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Court No.

1 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP (PIL) No.

04/2018 Puran Alley vs.

State of Sikkim & Ors.

1 THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Civil Extra Ordinary Jurisdiction) ------------------------------ CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MRS.

JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI ------------------------------ W.P. (PIL) No.

04 of 2018 Shri Puran Alley, S/o Shri Govind Prasad Alley, R/o Church Road, Gangtok East Sikkim. … Petitioner. versus 1.

State of Sikkim Through the Chief Secretary Government of Sikkim Gangtok, East Sikkim.

2.

Secretary, Building & Housing Department Government of Sikkim Gangtok, East Sikkim.

3.

Chief Engineer, Building & Housing Department Government of Sikkim Gangtok, East Sikkim.

4.

Shri Sonam Topden Bhutia, Class-1’A’ Government Contractor Regd.

No.

579/PWD/2008 Lower Tadong, Gangtok, East Sikkim. … Respondents.

2 --------------------------------- Appearance: Mr.

B.

Sharma, Sr.

Advocate with Mr.

Bhola Nath Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner. --------------------------------- O R D E R (O R A L ) (25.04.2018) Satish K.

Agnihotri, CJ Mr.

Sharma, Learned Senior Advocate, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this Petition with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.

Considered.

Thus, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforestated liberty.

Judge Chief Justice 25.04.2018 25.04.2018 Index : Yes / No jk/ds Internet : Yes / No