Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010000522018
DISPOSED

Priyam Porwal Sharma vs Joy Sharma and Others

Case NumberWP (Crl.) /2/2018
Date of Filing25 Apr 2018
Case TypeWrit Petition Criminal
Last Hearing11 Sept 2019
State--
City--
Year of Filing2018

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Priyam Porwal Sharma
Respondent
  • Joy Sharma and Others
  • Nand Prakash Sharma
  • Mrs. Kalpana Sharma

Case Summary

Priyam Porwal Sharma filed Case No. WP (Crl.) /2/2018 in the Sikkim High Court on 25 Apr 2018 against Joy Sharma and Others and Nand Prakash Sharma. The case has undergone 8 hearings over 1 year and 1 month. The case was disposed of on 11 Sept 2019. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (8)

  • 11SEP 2019
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 5AUG 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 4JUL 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 21FEB 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice Vijai Kumar Bist

  • 9OCT 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 4SEP 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 3AUG 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

  • 12JUL 2018
    Hearing

    Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan

Orders (10)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Court No.3.

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P. (Crl) No.

02 of 2018 PRIYAM PORWAL SHARMA …….

PETITIONER VERSUS JOY SHARMA & ORS. …….

RESPONDENTS Date: 11.09.2019 CORAM : HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.

For Petitioner : Mr.

Sudesh Joshi, Advocate.

Petitioner in person.

For Respondent No.1. : Mr.

Rahul Rathi, Advocate.

Respondent No.1 in person. ……..

The Petitioner appears in person along with her learned Counsel Mr.

Sudesh Joshi.

The Respondent No.1 also appears in person along with his learned Counsel Mr.

Rahul Rathi.

The Petitioner seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition on the ground that the Petitioner and the Respondent No.1 have compromised their disputes.

The Respondent No.1 agrees and admits to the said fact.

In view of the same, the Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition.

The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

The pending application stands disposed accordingly.

Judge 11.09.2019 Index : Yes / No to/ Internet : Yes / No