Meta Pixel
CNR: SKHC010001272020
DISPOSED

Union of India vs M/s. AARPEE Infraprojects (P) Ltd.

Case NumberArb.P. /3/2020
Date of Filing26 Nov 2020
Case TypePetitions Under Indian Arbitration Act
Last Hearing26 Aug 2021
State--
City--
Year of Filing2020

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Union of India
Respondent
  • M/s. AARPEE Infraprojects (P) Ltd.

Case Summary

Union of India filed Case No. Arb.P. /3/2020 in the Sikkim High Court on 26 Nov 2020 against M/s. AARPEE Infraprojects (P) Ltd.. The case has undergone 4 hearings over 4 months. The case was disposed of on 26 Aug 2021. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (4)

  • 26AUG 2021
    Disposal

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 26JUL 2021
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 30JUN 2021
    Orders

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  • 1APR 2021
    Admission

    Judge: Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Orders (6)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

COURT NO.1 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing Arb.

P.

No.

03/2020 UNION OF INDIA PETITIONER (S) VERSUS M/S AARPEE INFRAPROJECTS (P) LTD.

RESPONDENT (S) For Petitioner : Ms.

Sangita Pradhan, Asst.

Solicitor General of India.

For Respondent : None.

Date: 26/08/2021 CORAM : HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI, CJ. … Ms.

Sangita Pradhan, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator.

The petitioner made a proposal for appointment of Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Sadanand Mukherjee, former Judge of Patna High Court to be appointed as Arbitrator, but on the last date i.e. on 26.07.2021, the name of the former Chief Justice of this Court, Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Satish Kumar Agnihotri was proposed.

The petitioner has not shown any objection on it but because the respondent did not appear in the case, therefore, notice was sent to them for the said proposal and the consent from Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Satish Kumar Agnihotri has also been sought for.

As per Office Report notice sent to the respondent has been served, but again the respondent has not appeared in the case.

The consent of Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Satish Kumar Agnihotri has also been received by this Court.

COURT NO.1 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing In view of the above, this Petition is hereby disposed of with a direction that Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Satish Kumar Agnihotri is appointed as a sole Arbitrator in the matter, who shall adjudicate the issue in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid observation, this Arbitration Petition stands disposed of.

Chief Justice avi/