RAM KISHAN @ JEEWAN RAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

2023:PHHC:139923 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202-1 CRM-M-28607-2023 Date of Decision: 02.11.2023 Ram Kishan @ Jeewan Ram .........

Peoner Versus State of Haryana ........

Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr.

Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the peoner.

Mr.

Rajat Gautam, Addl.

A.G.

Haryana.(Through Video Conferencing). **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No.

Dated Police Sta0on Sec0ons 25 19.07.2022 SVB Gurgaon, District State Vigilance Bureau, Haryana 10 of Haryana Development and Regulaon of Urban Areas Act, 81 of Indian Registraon Act 1908, under Secon 13(1) (d) read with Secon 13(2) of Prevenon of Corrupon Act, 1988 and 420, 120-B IPC 1.

The peoner apprehending the arrest in the FIR caponed above, has come up before this Court under Secon 438 CrPC seeking bail.

2.

Vide order dated 01.06.2023, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court had granted interim bail, which is connuing ll date.

3.

The peoner is a property dealer and was instrumental in ge=ng the land transferred through a release deed instead of sale deed which resulted in a loss of Rs.

23 lakhs to the exchequer.

Since the peoner is not a Government servant and it was the primarily job of Tehsildar and Patwari to ensure that the transfer is done on the payment of applicable registraon fee, as such, there would be no jusficaon to deny the bail to the peoner.

4.

In the enrety of facts and circumstances, the peon is allowed and interim order dated 01.06.2023 is made absolute. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 02.11.2023 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:139923 1 of 1 ::: Downloaded on - 08-11-2023 14:38:58 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:139923