Meta Pixel
CNR: PHHC010977272023
PENDING

MOHINDER SINGH vs NILKANTH S AVHAD, SECY. DEPT. OF PWD B AND R

Case NumberCOCP-2298-2023
Date of Filing2 Aug 2023
Case TypeCOCP(CIVIL ORIGINAL CONTEMPT PETITION)-19
Last Hearing14 Mar 2024
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MOHINDER SINGH
Respondent
  • NILKANTH S AVHAD
  • SECY. DEPT. OF PWD B AND R

Case Summary

MOHINDER SINGH filed Case No. COCP-2298-2023 in the Punjab And Haryana High Court on 2 Aug 2023 against NILKANTH S AVHAD and SECY. DEPT. OF PWD B AND R. The case has undergone 4 hearings over 7 months. The case is currently pending. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (4)

  • 14MAR 2024
    ORDINARY

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

  • 12DEC 2023
    ORDINARY

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

  • 23NOV 2023
    ORDINARY

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

  • 4AUG 2023
    URGENT

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

2024:PHHC:037035 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 234 COCP-2298-2023 Date of decision: 14.03.2024 MOHINDER SINGH ...Petitioner Versus NILKANTH S AVHAD, SECY.

DEPT.

OF PWD B AND R ...Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT Present:- None for the petitioner.

Mr.

Vishnav Gandhi, DAG, Punjab. **** RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (Oral) 1.

This is a contempt petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, for punishing the respondent for disobeying the order dated 23.09.2022 passed in CWP-22022-2022.

2.

Affidavit of Priyank Bharti, IAS, Secretary to Government of Punjab, Public Works Department (B & R), Branch, Punjab, filed in the Registry, is taken on record.

3.

Counsel for the respondent submits that the order dated 23.09.2022 passed in CWP-22022-2022 has been complied with and the appeal filed by the petitioner has been decided by passing a speaking order dated 20.11.2023 (Annexure R-1).

4.

In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed, as such.

5.

However, if any grievance of the petitioner is left un- addressed, he would be at liberty to raise the same in any other alternate remedy, but in accordance with law.

14.03.2024 (RAJBIR SEHRAWAT) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:037035 1 of 1 ::: Downloaded on - 16-03-2024 03:43:19 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:037035