Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

HARSAD BASTIA TINIGHARIA, NAYABAZAR, COUUTCK-4 vs S.D.O(ELECT.), TPCODL, BADAMBADI

Case Number79/2025
Date of Filing16 Sept 2025
Case Type--
Last Hearing23 Dec 2025
StateOdisha
CityBhubaneswar
Year of Filing2025

Party Details

Petitioner
  • HARSAD BASTIA TINIGHARIA
  • NAYABAZAR
  • COUUTCK-4
Respondent
  • S.D.O(ELECT.)
  • TPCODL
  • BADAMBADI

Case Summary

HARSAD BASTIA TINIGHARIA and NAYABAZAR filed Case No. 79/2025 in the OERC on 16 Sept 2025 against S.D.O(ELECT.) and TPCODL. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 23 Dec 2025. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 23DEC 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

1 Together, Let us light up our lives ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BIDYUT NIYAMAK BHAWAN PLOT NO.4, CHUNOKOLI, SHAILASHREE VIHAR, BHUBANESWAR -751021 TEL.

No.

2721048, 2721049 E-MAIL: [email protected] / [email protected] WEBSITE: www.orierc.org Present: Shri P.

K.

Jena, Chairperson Shri S.

Ray Mohapatra, Member Shri B.

Mohanty, Member Case No.

79/2025 Sri Harsad Bastia ………… Petitioner Vrs.

The S.D.O (Electrical), TPCODL,Electrical Sub-Division, Badambadi, Cuttack ………… Respondent In the matter of: Application under Section 142 of the Electricity Act, 2003 alleging non-compliance of order dated 09.10.2024 of the learned GRF, Cuttack passed in C.C.

Case No213 of 2024.

ORDER Date of Hearing: 23.12.2025 Date of Order: 23.12.2025 This matter is taken up for hearing through hybrid arrangement.

2.

Shri Rabin Kishore Behera, the Authorized Representative of the Petitioner- Sri Harsad Bastia and Shri Goutam Jayprakash, HoG (Legal), TPCODL- the Respondent do appear.

Perused the case record, the Petitioner files reply complying the order dated 09.10.2024 of the learned GRF, Cuttack passed in C.C.

Heard.

3.

Perused the case record.

This is a case under Section 142 of the Electricity Act,2003, filed by the Petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 09.10.2024 of the learned GRF, Cuttack passed in C.C.

The Learned GRF has issued the following orders: “1.

The complainant is directed to deposit the estimated amount for LT extension work as claimed by the O.P. along with other requisite documents as required by the OP.

The OP. is directed to provide new service connection to the complainant adhering the time line as specified in Regulation-33 of OERC Supply Code,2019.

After submission of requisite documents and deposit of necessary fees, security deposit and other charges by the complainant in response to clear communication from OP. n from OP., if there will be delay on part of OP in release of new connection then OP shall be liable for payment of compensation for 2 each day of default in accordance with OERC (Licensees Standard of Performance Regulations), 2004.” 4.

In course of the hearing, both the Authorized Representative of the Petitioner and the Respondent of TPCODL submit that the order dated 09.10.2024 of the learned GRF, Cuttack passed in C.C.

Case No.213 of 2024 (supra) has been implemented inasmuch as a new service connection has been duly given to the Petitioner’s premises following the due procedure pertaining to the RoW.

Thus, the directions of the Learned GRF, Cuttack passed in C.C.

Case No.213 of 2024 (supra), are found fully complied with and there is nothing more for the Commission to examine and decide.

Consequently, the case is disposed of on full satisfaction of the order dated 09.10.2024 of the learned GRF, Cuttack passed in C.C.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (B.

Mohanty) (S.K.

Ray Mohapatra) (P.

Jena) Member Member Chairperson