Meta Pixel
CNR: MLHC010009552021
DISPOSED

Dilip Basfor vs A. Ch. Marak,ias And 2 Ors.

Case NumberCont.Cas(C)/18/2021
Date of Filing26 Nov 2021
Case TypeCont.Cas(C)
Last Hearing30 Mar 2022
State--
City--
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • DILIP BASFOR
Respondent
  • A. CH. MARAK
  • IAS AND 2 ORS.

Case Summary

DILIP BASFOR filed Case No. Cont.Cas(C)/18/2021 in the Meghalaya High Court on 26 Nov 2021 against A. CH. MARAK and IAS AND 2 ORS.. The case has undergone 7 hearings over 4 months. The case was disposed of on 30 Mar 2022. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (7)

  • DISPOSED

    Judge: N/A

  • 30MAR 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 4MAR 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 11FEB 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 13DEC 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 30NOV 2021
    MOTION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • MOTION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

Orders (6)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Page 1 of 1 Serial No.

20 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Cont.Cas(C) No.

18 of 2021 Date of Decision: 18.04.2022 Shri Dilip Basfor Vs.

Shri A Ch.

Marak, IAS, & Ors.

Coram: Hon’ble Mr.

Justice H.

S.

Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr.

Deb, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Ms.

Bhattacharjee, GA i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: (ORAL) 1.

Heard Mr.

Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that that petitioner has alleged that the respondents are in contempt of the order dated 13.08.2019, wherein the respondents were directed to consider the representation of the petitioner.

2.

The State respondents have filed an affidavit indicating that the representation of the petitioner was duly considered, and the matter was forwarded for consideration of regularization.

3.

In that view of the matter, no contempt is made out and the matter is closed and accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE Meghalaya 18.04.2022 “V.

Lyndem-PS”