Meta Pixel
CNR: MLHC010004512021
DISPOSED

Darwin Ch. Sangma vs The Garo Hills Autonomous Ditrict Council And 3 Ors.

Case NumberWP(C)/179/2021
Date of Filing17 Jun 2021
Case TypeWP(C)
Last Hearing4 Apr 2022
State--
City--
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • DARWIN CH. SANGMA
Respondent
  • THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DITRICT COUNCIL AND 3 ORS.

Case Summary

DARWIN CH. SANGMA filed Case No. WP(C)/179/2021 in the Meghalaya High Court on 17 Jun 2021 against THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DITRICT COUNCIL AND 3 ORS.. The case has undergone 11 hearings over 7 months. The case was disposed of on 4 Apr 2022. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (11)

  • DISPOSED

    Judge: N/A

  • 4APR 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 16MAR 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 4MAR 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 9FEB 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 3DEC 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 18NOV 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 2NOV 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 7OCT 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • 3SEP 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • MOTION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

Orders (10)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Serial No.

15 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C).

No.

179 of 2021 Date of Order :20.04.2022 Shri.

Darwin Ch.

Sangma Vs.

G.H.A.D.C. & Ors.

Coram: Hon’ble Mr.

Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge.

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr.

K.C.Gautam, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Mr.

S.Deb, Adv. vice Mr.

S.Dey, Adv. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: ______________________ ORAL Mr.

K.C.

Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this instant matter with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, matter stands closed and disposed of on being withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

Judge Meghalaya 20.04.2022 “Samantha PS”