Meta Pixel
CNR: MLHC010004302018
DISPOSED

Phul K. Hynniewta vs State Of Meghalaya And 3 Ors.

Case NumberWP(C)/203/2018
Date of Filing21 Jun 2018
Case TypeWP(C)
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2018

Party Details

Petitioner
  • PHUL K. HYNNIEWTA
Respondent
  • STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS.

Case Summary

PHUL K. HYNNIEWTA filed Case No. WP(C)/203/2018 in the Meghalaya High Court on 21 Jun 2018 against STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS.. The case has undergone 2 hearings. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (2)

  • DISPOSED

    Judge: N/A

  • MOTION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, CHIEF JUSTICE (FORMER)

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Serial No.

19 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No.

203 of 2018 Date of Decision : 25.06.2018 Smti Phul K.

Hynniewta Vs State of Meghalaya & Ors.

Coram: Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr.

S.

Wahlang, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Ms.

P.

Agarwal, GA i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No ORAL 1) Nursing Staff which include the petitioner had projected their grievances against non-consideration of their cases for promotion as a result whereof series of representations dated 20th April, 2016, 27th April, 2016, 7th July, 2016, 5th January, 2017 and 8th June, 2017 had been submitted to the Director of Health Services (MI), Meghalaya, Shillong but without any response.

Hence, the instant petition.

2) Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that at this stage the petitioner would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to accord consideration to the representations of the petitioner for promotion in accordance with the rules, same is not opposed by learned GA appearing for respondents.

The relief sought is innocuous.

Therefore, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to accord due consideration to the representations seeking consideration for promotion to the next higher post.

3) The exercise shall be undertaken and completed within a period of six weeks from today, result of consideration be it affirmative or negative whatever permissible under the rules shall be conveyed to the petitioner.

Rules and Regulations while considering the representations shall be strictly followed.

4) Liberty to the petitioner to re-agitate subject to survival of cause.

5) Disposed of as above. (Mohammad Yaqoob Mir) Chief Justice Meghalaya 25.06.2018 “V.

Lyndem PS”