Meta Pixel
CNR: MLHC010006842018
DISPOSED

The Meghalaya Soil Conservation Rangers Association vs Riewpyrkhat Shullai And 12 Ors.

Case NumberMC(WPC)/162/2018
Date of Filing30 Aug 2018
Case TypeMC(WPC)
Last Hearing1 Oct 2018
State--
City--
Year of Filing2018

Party Details

Petitioner
  • THE MEGHALAYA SOIL CONSERVATION RANGERS ASSOCIATION
Respondent
  • RIEWPYRKHAT SHULLAI AND 12 ORS.

Case Summary

THE MEGHALAYA SOIL CONSERVATION RANGERS ASSOCIATION filed Case No. MC(WPC)/162/2018 in the Meghalaya High Court on 30 Aug 2018 against RIEWPYRKHAT SHULLAI AND 12 ORS.. The case has undergone 3 hearings over 25 days. The case was disposed of on 1 Oct 2018. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (3)

  • DISPOSED

    Judge: N/A

  • 1OCT 2018
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, CHIEF JUSTICE (FORMER)/HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. R. SEN (FORMER JUDGE)

  • 6SEP 2018
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, CHIEF JUSTICE (FORMER)/HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. R. SEN (FORMER JUDGE)

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Page 1 of 2 Serial No.

07 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC (WPC) No.

162 of 2018 Date of Order: 31.10.2018 The Meghalaya Soil Conservation Vs.

Riewpyrkhat Shullai & Ors.

Rangers Association Coram: Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr.

Justice S.R.

Sen, Judge Appearance: For the Applicant (s) : Mr. .CH.

Mawlong, Adv.

For the Respondent (s) : Mr.

H.L.

Shangreiso, Adv.

Mr.

A.

Kumar, AG with Mr.

T.L.

Jyrwa, GA (For R 1-7) Ms.

P.

Roy, Adv. (For R 8-13, 17&18) vice Mr.

K.P.

Bhattacharjee, Adv. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No Per Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ:ORAL 1) The instant application has been filed on behalf of Meghalaya Soil Conservation Rangers Association seeking impleadment as party respondent.

Learned counsel for petitioners has filed objection, according to him the applicants have no interest in the lis so they are neither necessary nor proper party, learned Advocate General has no objection as according to him the applicants are necessary party.

2) We have considered the submissions as made and perused the records, clash of interests between applicant and parties are apparent therefore by allowing the application to hear the applicants will help Page 2 of 2 effectual adjudication of the issues.

Therefore the applicant is impleaded as party respondent No.

19, necessary note to this effect shall be recorded in Cause Title of the petition.

Learned counsel for petitioners to furnish copy of the petition as well as annexures to the applicant so as to enable him to file affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks.

3) The instant application shall stand accordingly disposed of. (S.R.

Sen) (Mohammad Yaqoob Mir) Judge Chief Justice Meghalaya 31.10.2018 “V.

Lyndem PS”