Chumeng Sangma vs State Of Meghalaya And 5 Ors.
Party Details
- CHUMENG SANGMA
- STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.
Case Summary
CHUMENG SANGMA filed Case No. WP(C)/202/2020 in the Meghalaya High Court on 15 Jul 2020 against STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.. The case has undergone 7 hearings over 4 months. The case was disposed of on 20 Apr 2021. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (7)
- DISPOSED
Judge: N/A
- 20APR 2021ORDERS
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)
- 19MAR 2021ORDERS
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)
Orders (5)
- 14FEB 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 5
- 19MAR 2021orderView Order ↗
Order No: 4
- 25FEB 2021orderView Order ↗
Order No: 3
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
Serial No.
17 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP (C) No.
200 of 2020 with WP (C) No.
201 of 2020 WP (C) No.
202 of 2020 WP (C) No.
205 of 2020 WP (C) No.
206 of 2020 WP (C) No.
207 of 2020 WP (C) No.
208 of 2020 WP (C) No.
209 of 2020 WP (C) No.
210 of 2020 WP (C) No.
213 of 2020 WP (C) No.
214 of 2020 WP (C) No.
216 of 2020 WP (C) No.
217 of 2020 Date of Order: 14.02.2022 Shri.
Korilson D.
Sangma Vs.
State of Meghalaya & 5 Ors.
Shri.
Riseng Marak Vs.
Chumeng Sangma Vs.
Ranseng Marak Vs.
Greswarsh R.
Jepsin Momin Vs.
Rikjeng Sangma Vs.
Diseng Marak Vs.
Dising Sangma Vs.
Sphera Marak Vs.
Dippunath Sangma Vs.
Ritjeng Sangma Vs.
Balseng Sangma Vs.
Coram: Hon’ble Mr.
Justice H.
S.
Thangkhiew, Judge ______________________ Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr.
A.H.
Hazarika, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr.
N.D.
Chullai, AAG with Mr.
R.
Gurung, Addl.
Sr.
GA Mr.
Sengupta, Addl.
GA Ms.
Colney, GA Mr.
K.P.
Bhattacharjee, GA Ms.
Z.E.
Nongkynrih, GA Mr.
H.
Abraham, GA Ms.
I.
Lyngwa, GA i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: ______________________ ORAL Matter taken up via Video Conferencing.
This batch of writ petitions, on the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AG for the State respondents have become infructuous as the sanction amounts has since been released to the petitioners concerned. concerned.
Accordingly, in view of the statements at the Bar, these writ petitions are disposed of on being infructuous.
JUDGE Meghalaya 14.02.2022 “Samantha -PS”