Meta Pixel
CNR: MLHC010003292021
DISPOSED

Jia Sangma vs State Of Meghalaya And 2 Ors.

Case NumberWP(C)/140/2021
Date of Filing1 Apr 2021
Case TypeWP(C)
Last Hearing17 Mar 2022
State--
City--
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • JIA SANGMA
Respondent
  • STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS.

Case Summary

JIA SANGMA filed Case No. WP(C)/140/2021 in the Meghalaya High Court on 1 Apr 2021 against STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS.. The case has undergone 12 hearings over 11 months. The case was disposed of on 17 Mar 2022. 11 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (12)

  • DISPOSED

    Judge: N/A

  • 17MAR 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 24FEB 2022
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 17DEC 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 15DEC 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 1DEC 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 30NOV 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 29NOV 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 8NOV 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 27OCT 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 6APR 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • MOTION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

Orders (11)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Serial No.

01 Supplementary List I HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No.

140 of 2021 Date of Order: 23.03.2022 Shri Jia Sangma Vs.

State of Meghalaya & Ors.

Coram: Hon’ble Mr.

Justice H.

S.

Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr.

M.L.

Nongpiur, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Mr.

N.D.

Chullai, AAG with Mr.

A.H.

Kharwanlang, GA i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: (ORAL) 1.

Mr.

Nongpiur, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant matter with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.

2.

The prayer is allowed, accordingly the matter is closed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed.

JUDGE Meghalaya 23.03.2022 “V.

Lyndem-PS”